A picture or two on this link. It may have had ‘one careful owner’, but the others seem to have been rather negligent! Running over it with a tank is always quite tough on an aeroplane.
https://www.facebook.com/MilwebMilitary/posts/the-first-focke-wulf-fw19…
I think it is getting better, little by little.
For a year it was parked in the long grass with flat tyres, now it is taxiing quite fast, who knows, it might even fly…. ?
When I watched it display at Duxford that day I was (unknowingly ) witnessing the final ever public flight of a Sea Vixen. Half an hour later, its flying career scraped to halt at the end of the Yeovilton’s runway.
Not so long ago, there was a mainstream magazine dedicated to the UK’s flying historic jet scene. Sad to reflect, it would be a pretty thin publication now.
Thanks to the success of the crowdfunding appeal, and the dedication of the engineers, the Cat was today able to fire up the new engine.
Matt Dearden has today posted as follows-
”After just over a month since Miss Pick Up was stranded at Loch Ness, she finally has a working starboard engine again. In the words of our engineer, Garry, there’s still a few niggles to iron out but certainly less niggly than a broken driveshaft somewhere deep in an engine floating out on a Loch…
Our small team of volunteers has been working every single day on the engine change, spurred on by everyone who has so kindly donated to the rescue operation. We cannot thank you all enough!
Hopefully the niggles can be sorted over the weekend and when Garry is happy, when the weather is ok and when Miss Pick Up feels ready, we will launch! That will mean warming up both engines on the quayside, craning her on to the water (with suitable wind speed and direction for take-off), starting up and flying the ten minute hop to Inverness. We need to go to Inverness to refuel. Garry will take another look over the plane at Inverness and then, all being well, we will fly home to Duxford. Realistically we may need to overnight at Inverness due to the lack of daylight hours at this time of year.
Once again thank you all so very much for all the donations and do remember, any additional donations we receive now will go towards the estimated £25,000 cost to repair the damaged engine.”
https://www.gofundme.com/f/misspickup?fbclid=IwAR2hr8LMUpluFOuAJ-nuBduK…
Very nicely done. Seeing as it is a safety video, I will say in a stern voice that I did not like the way the pilot set the prop blade with his fingers wrapped right round. From time to time, they do kick back………….
Quantas have a history to be proud of, it is great to see that they care about it.
It is very sad. There was no need for this.
A further factor is that in this unusual year, a lot of aviation activity which might have generated news/discussion has by necessity been put on hold.
We have all lived ‘on screens’ way too much in recent months, and perhaps people feel a bit jaded, flat, and not quite so motivated to get stuck into online discussions. Hopefully, everyone will feel a bit more energised before too long.
UKAR too, is very quiet, just a handful of post today. A lot of info is on fb, but of course spread over hundreds/thousands of pages, far more than anyone could monitor. Furthermore, the average fb contribution barely exceeds two short sentences and as a platform it is unsuitable for wide ranging discussions and debate, and it is transitory, very hard to pick up and maintain a long-running thread.
When a good forum is working well, it becomes the ‘clearing house’ for most of the news, gossip etc. That is what we are missing right now.
Hi Cherp, welcome to the forum. Thanks for your offer of help, hopefully the OP will pick up on this.
Welcome to the forum bt, thanks for the lead.
With luck some of the earlier contributors on this thread will see it.
When they flew circuits around their aerodromes, the distance between runway and downwind leg might be down to half a mile or so. A tight 45 degree banked turn could reverse heading in less than that
MK12 (once) of this forum posted this picture , observing as follows
”PT879 photographed at Airframe Assemblies on I.O.W. on 17 March 1998.
By my judgement of the leading edges, I would say it impacted snow or very soft ground inverted at about 10 degrees to the horizontal.
Mark”
I wonder if they tried applying a high pressure air-line, to return it back to 3D shape.
In the scheme of things, that wreckage represents a very substantial start for a rebuild.
Rich, thanks for the ‘back-story’, and it is encouraging to hear the project is based on a sound and long-term plan. It will be a major challenge to fabricate geodetic/geodesic ( you see both terms) structure. The fact the scrapping has been halted is very welcome news.
On the point of the Halifax, my impression is that it is generally held in very high regard. It is certainly an impressive exhibit and a credit to the team who worked on it. They tried to obtain the Halifax fuselage section held by the IWM but they declined to release it, sadly, and so a new nose had to be fabricated. It was an innovative effort, and made available to the public a complete Halifax, which is something the RAF museum have taken 45 years not to do.
Two attempts were made to make a single-engine take -off, but sufficient airspeed could not be reached.
Crew Chief reports as follows-
”It was felt to be very important to at least try and get the Catalina off the Loch as there are no slipways there and very few options for beaching. Two attempts were made by our two very experienced pilots to safely take off on the good engine. This was unsuccessful as insufficient speed could be attained and no further attempts were made. In the end, the lifeboat team who took us in tow were able to take us to a mooring buoy where, in darkness, we safely secured the aircraft.
All focus is now on replacing the broken starter motor and effecting a temporary repair on the port blister to safely fly off the loch in the next few days and fly the short distance to Inverness Dalcross Airport. It was very unfortunate that a fairly simple mechanical failure was compounded by an over-enthusiastic boatman, not one of our team. But accidents happen. I hope this clarifies the position.” D.L
It was subsequent to this post that the more serious extent of the engine issues became apparent.
Aged 18 (min) he would have been born 1897.
The Gnat entered service in about 1961, making our pilot 64, so too old to still be a service pilot.
Perhaps he was employed by Hawker Siddeley, as a civilian with more flexible retirement rules. Neville Duke was still flying in a professional capacity into his sixties.
Gnats did not become civilian-owned and operated until the 1980’s by which time our notional pilot would be rather ‘senior’ to be instructing on jets.
”What state is the Viking?” somebody asked.
Not showroom condition, it would be fair to say. The fin has a folding mod that was probably unknown in the Vickers design office. It may be even worse now .
The type first flew before the end of WW2- we should not be scrapping such historic aeroplanes in 2020, and it surely deserves to be saved, ideally as a Viking and not a Mickey-Mouse ‘ Vikington’.
https://www.jetphotos.com/photo/9447413
4th installment at 9.00 tonight