dark light

dees01

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 158 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitifre versus modern jet fighter!! #1421571
    dees01
    Participant

    Does anyone know what the g limits of a Spitfire are??

    in reply to: Spitifre versus modern jet fighter!! #1421590
    dees01
    Participant

    Here’s the important part. Get the jet to go low and slow and he’s toast!

    Low no bother, and anything with a decent FCS will coope with slow. Plus the jet will have the added bonus that it can gain energy much more quickly than a Spit could!

    in reply to: Phantoms. Where and when? #1425551
    dees01
    Participant

    Harrier XW175

    Currently the oldest flying Harrier (unless any of the Thai AV-8As are older), still flying as the VAAC at Boscombe…

    in reply to: Spitifre versus modern jet fighter!! #1427208
    dees01
    Participant

    Daz,

    Quite possibly true, but I though we were talking about modern jets, not one that is 50 years old! Something like an F-18 has a slightly more sophisticated FCS than a Lightning!

    in reply to: Spitifre versus modern jet fighter!! #1427230
    dees01
    Participant

    They actually went up and dog fight each other and because of the speed differance the CAF guys would win or come out even. A large Fighter like the 14 or 18 can’t maintane the tight turn of the Prop planes because they just fall-off.

    Hmm. I can’t believe that the prop aircraft would stand much of a chance of actually winning against a modern jet, but I could believe that the jet may find it hard to get a kill shot in, as the prop job could fly that much slower for a given alpha. However, the jet will be able to sustain a much higher AoA and also sustain a much higher g level (we’re talking 9G for an F-15 without CFTs). the jet would also have to use its speed advanatage to get in a good killing position.

    EN830, you are right, an aircraft like a Mirage 2000 formating on a Spit would have lots of alpha on and the lateral and directional control is likely to be reduced. There is a good pic of the BBMF formed up with 2 Tornado F3s which shows the AoA difference to good effect. Don’t forget though, that this is formation flying and we are talking about combat here. Very different ball game.

    Dees

    in reply to: Spitifre versus modern jet fighter!! #1427579
    dees01
    Participant

    If it was “real-life” then surely the F-14 would engage the two “targets” from 100km away and sidewinder them into oblivion !!??

    Not from 100km away!! AIM-9s are short range missiles!! But, in principle, yes, modern combat tactics ditate that if you’ve got into a full-on turning fight, you’ve made a bit of a mistake… So shot from a long way way if poss…

    in reply to: XL577 Air Tests…Apparently #1435356
    dees01
    Participant

    The idea of a ‘display team’ display team consisting of WV318 (Black Arrows), XL577 (Blue Diamonds), G-MOUR (Yellowjacks) and G-RORI (repainted into Dead Sparrows colours) has been talked about more than once!!

    in reply to: Yeovilton Air Day – Takes a grilling? #1435770
    dees01
    Participant

    I spent the day on South Dispersal, and I have to say that bar a couple of highlights which were the Sea Fury and Sea Hawk, first time I’ve seen that fly since it went to Dunsfold) and the Harrier 4 ship (possibly the last time you will see a massed Sea Harrier flyby), the rest of the display was pretty tame. Yes, the weather didn’t help, that was why Miss Demeanour didn’t display, but then Jonathon was refused a revised slot. Apparently there was no room in the display for him during the afternoon show,which given the amount of gaps in the flypro was a bit poor. Also, why did a number of the aircraft taking off start from the intersection, rather than right in front of most of the crowd??

    So, all in all I was glad I didn’t have to pay to get in. I may have been a bit miffed if I had!

    in reply to: XL577 Air Tests…Apparently #1435776
    dees01
    Participant

    The Blue Diamonds scheme will go well with Black Arrows painted T7A,’318. That will make a nice pairing!

    in reply to: Really, no, no REALLY Authentic Warbird Schemes #1557384
    dees01
    Participant

    One of the Mustangs that was at RIAT this year (bit of a brainfade, can’t remember which one) was in bare metal, not polished with suitable stains, weathering on the exhausts, etc. I was lead to believe that this scheme was as authentic as they guys could make it! (obviously no cordite stains though!)

    PS, if you want authentic jet warbird schemes, WV372 wears pukka 2 Sqn markings (hi-gloss), and WV318 is in (to the best of my knowledge) authentic 111 Sqn Black Arrows markings.

    in reply to: Buccaneer Ejection Seat Parts Required #1558618
    dees01
    Participant

    Have you tried the guys at Thunder City? Seeing as how they have 3 airworthy beasts, they may have some non fligthworthy parts for the seats…

    in reply to: Buccaneer Ejection Seat Parts Required #1558619
    dees01
    Participant

    Buccsoc,

    Are you sure you mean Anti g straps? Do you not mean Negative G straps?

    in reply to: Kemble – Sunday 12th Sep #1559814
    dees01
    Participant

    Miss Demeanour will be returning to Kemble sometime on Sunday afternoon, after Jonathon has displayed at Southport, so there may be possiblity of a flyby or two. Don’t know of anything else happening, though!

    in reply to: COLD WAR JETS 5TH SEPT BRUNTERS #1605585
    dees01
    Participant

    Hadn’t realised carrying bombs makes a jet sound louder…!

    ‘Course it does! More bombs means more weight, therefore more power needed to hover! Which all adds up to more noise!

    in reply to: COLD WAR JETS 5TH SEPT BRUNTERS #1605959
    dees01
    Participant

    “Nor does a Harrier sound as impressive as the Victor at max power………..”

    Would have to disagree – Harrier GR7A (the big engined one) hovering with tanks and 2 1000lb LGBS sounds the terrier’s!!

Viewing 15 posts - 106 through 120 (of 158 total)