it is precisely 2,5 times bigger, with 56 ton mtow compared to 22,6 ton mtow for ch47. mi26 is a huge machine, really a class of its own in the world. I was surprised really that the russians even bothered offering it for this competition, as it seems its role can’t really be utilized decently. Then again, russians simply don’t have a range of helicopters to offer from. It was either mi26 or significantly smaller and thus again unsuited mi17.
Ideally, a 20-30 ton helicopter would serve the russians pretty well, for export as well as for russian army use. There was talk about russo-chinese project on a 30 ton helicopters, perhaps something will come out of that within a few years.
On another note, those several j10s give a nice reference for j20 length, as using the increasing length of all 3 j10s, as they approach closer to the camera, one can tell how many pixels would a j10 be long if standing where j20 is standing. All that being said, J20 without the pitot works out to around 20,2 meters. length from nose to end of engines works out to be 19,15 meters.
is there a way to know how many of 5086 lost helicopters were flyable but written off and how many actually crashed, be it even a light crash where the crew walked out alive?
I guess supersonic benefit might be too much at odds with other requirements. If the plane was a tu22m replacement then supersonic might be more worth it. But as it seems, the new plane is really going to be tu95 replacement (does that mean tu22m won’t get a project for project replacement?) which automatically means it needs massive range. There is no way to achieve that with supersonic requirement (at least not without some super fancy expensive new tech) so if one wants to remain within requirements and within budget – b2 lookalike is really the way to go.
frankly, if the new US bomber will have similar range requirements and budget limitations, and it seems it will, i wouldn’t be surpassed if we end up seeing another flying wing, similar to b2, perhaps with different trailing edges configuration…
has there been any clear images of torpedo tubes on yasen class? or an official report about its torpedo tubes?
I am asking this because there is a bunch of different and conflicting data concerning the tubes on the internet. Some say there are 6 650mm tubes and 4 533mm tubes. Some say there are 4 and 4 tubes. Some say 6 and 2. Some even say there are just four 533mm tubes.
I am not looking for another baseless claim, I would like a photo or official document which can settle this question once and for all. Does such a thing exist?
That 300 troops in an70 claim is ludicrous. should be changed to something more realistic. only way one could fit 300 people (not troops ready to fight) in there is if they all sat on the floor, crammed like sardines, without seats and rows. Naturally, that kind of seating would also yield much higher “people carried” count for other planes as well.
i think they waited with the ship itself for some time as the air wing wouldnt be ready. if one remembers, refurbishment of varyag started around 2005 or so. at the same time talks with russia concerning su33 sale went on, probably fell apart in 2008., when all the hoopla about illegal j11b started and media reported on the su33 sale not going through in early 2009., though realistically chinese must’ve known it wouldn’t go through even a year earlier, if not more.
Around 2008, incidentally, work on varyag slowed down. there was like a two year hiatus during which very little was done. then a few years later suddenly we have j15 prototype and refurbishment of varyag continuing.
To me it is clear the ship waited for j15 programme. If there wasn’t for the broken su33 sale we’d probably see the entire program being finished 2 years earlier.
il476 has longer range, carries more weight.
an70 has bigger cargo floor, offers more cargo volume and needs less runway to operate
and so on. 😀
yes, but why didn’t it happen? what were the reason behind such decision?
true, il476 has pretty small cargo area (and not a high ceiling either as well as rather narrow ramp door, but lets not talk about that right now). a400m has the same cargo area as il476, even a little bit larger if they both include ramp area.
an70 has some 10% larger cargo area than il476.
kawasaki c-2 has some 7-8% smaller cargo area than il476.
I must ask, why has the decision been made to use the original length of il76 for il476 programme? il76 has been modified with longer fuselage and thus bigger cargo hold and some examples were known to fly… but what happened then?
That croatian gripen buy is just a distant possibility. Croatian government has close to zero money for such a buy in the next several years, so the only option would be to take out a loan for pretty much the entire cost of the purchase. That is on top of already huge debt the country has, which is just growing. Before this offer came to light, it was said some 20 million euros was total budget Croatian air force can spend on new stuff – be it refurbishing existing obsolete migs or buying second hand unmodernized migs from another country. 20 to 500 million euros is quite a jump.
Politically, i don’t see such a deal going through, as the country’s finances are going toward Greece scenario and there would be massive political fallout over such a decision. The government is asking everyone to save on unnecesarry spending, it is cutting jobs and wages and then it is supposed to be hypocritical enough to spend hundreds of millions of euros on a fighter buy, even if part of that value will be returned to the country within 10 or so years?
Sure, offset sounds great but without published details it is not very relevant. What value multiplier would be used in offset arrangement? 2x? 5x? Makes a huge difference. What time period would be used? Influx of 200 million euros of money by 2014. or little by little until 2020. is again a huge difference. What sort of guarantee and penalties will be offered in the deal, if the actual investments don’t meet the ones mentioned in the contract?
also, all those images of fuselage under tarp being transported around china were pretty indicative of the plane size and all pointed to something 15-16 meters long with wings 11 or so meters wide.
i dont see anything strange with this plane using two ws13 engines. heck, maybe right now it is using two rd-93 engines. The nozzles on the images sure do look a lot like rd-93.
i just hope, if the deal goes through, the companies will pick a new combined name: BEADS 😀
are there any confirmed details about how they did it? from the text above it seems like there is first a 10 meter high (!!!??) fence as first perimeter. then there is an area of cleared land (how wide?) with two meter high barbed wire and finally there is a concrete wall ten meters high (again, is that an error? seems too high) with guard towers here and there.
how long does one need to clear all that? I guess i can understand that security personnel didn’t do their job and that the attackers in US uniforms just walked to the fence. but then they needed to cut a hole though that fence. how long does that take? I am guessing they just cut the fence silently. then they had to walk several meters, again do more cutting with the barbed wire. is it really that easy to cut so much wire in mere seconds?
but then, even if none of the guard towers saw anything during all that time, what about the concrete wall? how on earth could have they blown a hole? concrete wall, especially if armored, isn’t so easely destroyer. one can make holes in it, but the overall structure will remain if one just applies explosive next to it. One should really drill holes in the wall itself, place the explosive in those holes then detonate for best effect. was there really time to do that?
or, much more easely i guess – would be to just climb over the wall. i am having doubts about the 10 meter high claim anyway. what does one use to climb over? grappling hooks would work, i imagine. should still be a faster way over than punching a hole over the wall. especially if one doesn’t even plan to get out of the base alive. images of the walls in the base are hard to come by but ones i did manage to google suggest walls are something like 3 meters high.
so far india has 15 or 16 mig29k, with 29 or 30 more to be delivered. 24 are to be delivered to russian navy and some dozen or so more planes are yet undelivered to other customers. That’s some 65-70 planes to be produced in second half of 2012, 2013 and beginning of 2014.
Granted, i believe such a ramp up, up to 36 planes a year, would not be made if there weren’t guarantees for further buys. That may come from the indians (not likely, in my opinion), russian air force (possible but it’s hard to tell when it will happen) and third countries (that one is a given, though overall numbers are probably going to remain low, half a dozen to a dozen planes produced each year)