How to tell which websites have most honest figures for Eurofighter?
Spanish air force official website claims, for example, 11,5 tons as empty weight figure.
German air force official website claims 11 tons as empty weight figure.
Spanish AF site claims mach 2 as top speed.
German AF site claims mach 2,35 as top speed.
Then RAF web site claims mach 1,8 as top speed.
While Eurofighter consortium web site claims mach 2.
Neither of these two offer any info on empty weight.
Blockers or S ducts can’t be a simple choice. Requirements may be different. Requirements may even change during development. And perhaps something that was achievable by S ducts can be achievable with blockers. But also if requirements are changed so only certain radar wavelengths are required to be protected against, then it may be more prudent to go with one method over the other, if there’s weight savings or what not involved.
Basically, we’ve got insufficient data to conclude anything.
We don’t know what stores have been certified for use on J15. So it’s guesswork. There may be bombs or missiles cleared, but maybe not. We only have images of air to air missiles on active duty planes on Liaoning. Without any official info, there’s no way of telling how far along towards full operational capability J15s are. Images would appear to suggest some initial capability is there, but it’s all guesswork really.
Very trainery. I like it a lot. Not sure why twin tails are needed though. Are they perhaps closer to center of mass than they are on other trainers? Is the plane quite short?
Do any current USAF’s F-16 have MAWS? If so, which variants? Where are sensors visible on the airframe itself?
Finally, what subsystems are budgeted for USAF’s f-16 modernization program? Besides the radar, will they get new computer? New datalink? New RWR? MAWS? Intregrated jammer?
6,504 lb figure is A) clearly a placeholder figure where “not to exceed” has little to do with actual figure. or B) pertaining to something else, not just the engine. Doesn’t matter where it’s been written, there is no logic to it. All other modern engines have a quite different T/W value so it’s beyond silly that F135 suddenly drops to 1960s tech levels in that regard.
Antonov documents behind the Y-20 project:
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/2100325.html
From the original post:
http://www.aviaport.ru/conferences/18875/675.html#p407978
I can’t tell from the google translate of the text, are the specifications in the document shown basically what Y-20 is, or are they specifications of an earlier Antonov design that Y20 was based on? (So in reality actual Y20 specifications may differ from it?)
If you want to refer to the max tow weight, you are probably in the 560 N/m of torque. I recentely had to quickly design a leight weight/high capacity trailer and I was amazed… (it could tow customer thing on mud with some slope!) 😉
No, i was actually asking about the exact model of the truck towing NG’s plane because of length measurement. I’m not sure how long the truck is… should be around 6 meters but there’s tons of Ford pickup variants.
Which truck model (exactly) is that, towing the plane?
BTW, it’s pretty clear NG’s offering is not designed around an afterburning engine.
While I am sure there are other aspects of the modernization that are worth the money, I am not sure how effective the satnav and computer aided sight like on su24m are for a plane like tu-22m. Su-24 can often fly low and achieve fairly good accuracy using the system since the bombs don’t need to fall 5+ km. Precision should be fairly good. Tu22m, however, performs almost exclusively from high altitude (If i am not mistaken) and using the same system at 5-10 km will yield several times greater miss distances.
Will B-1b carry JASSM internally? Would that be against some treaties? If it can, would it mean it’d carry roughly 18 or so cruise missiles internally?
As long as it was a secret base, even deliberate bombing means they’re safe from public repercussions.
How often do Su-30 carry more than two r-27T? I can’t seem to rememeber seeing any such image.
Also, have mig-29 ever regularly loaded r-27T for their training?
Also remains to be seen just how many pak-fa will be needed by then, with all these su30/su35/mig35 contracts and plans.
Have we seen a plan to increase the number of training squadrons? To increase the number of combat pilots? That might indicate additional combat squadrons years down the road…
With the number of sorties and basically a year into the campaign, one helicopter combat loss is pretty good survival ratio.