dark light

Joe Petroni

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 576 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Spitfire TE184 #1389666
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Just curious, but did this conversion of TE184 include new fuselage ribs to ‘high-back’ specs, or is it a ‘visual’ change of configuration with the low-back fuselage frames still intact??

    You have kind of hit the nail on the head there Archer.

    Lets just say that the fuselage frames were all new build, to high back spec manufactured to original drawings, which was not the original intention.

    in reply to: Spitfire TE184 #1389848
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Hi Eddie

    There had been an earlier attempt at converting this aircraft to high back configuration, which, putting it diplomatically proved to be wholly unsatisfactory. However this issue was well and truly resolved during its subsequent restoration.

    I thought perhaps you may have seen the aircraft in its ‘transient’ phase and therefore formed your opinion of the restoration on that basis.

    Anyway I am glad you have clarified your point, as I know one or two people who worked hard on that aircraft who would have been quite upset reading your original comments.

    in reply to: Spitfire TE184 #1390242
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The aircraft is definitely a XVI… it was originally low back, but was butchered to a high back config in its “restoration”.
    There were some XVIs built in high back spec – the difference between that and a IX is the XVIs have Packard Merlins.

    Hi Eddie

    I would be interested to hear how you have come to your conclusions regarding this restoration. :confused:

    in reply to: Centarus Powered Sea Fury! #1567047
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The Bristol Hercules Engine, forerunner of the Centaurus, achieved the highest T.B.O. of any radial engine. So in their day reliability wise they were the best of the bunch.

    Perhaps we don’t have the skills or knowledge or tooling nowadays to maintain that reliability?

    in reply to: Austers v Piper Cubs #436466
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    I need to check when I get home. I think, although I may be wrong that it is an AOP9 re-engined and modified to AOP11/Beagle E3 standard with the original Bombardier engine replaced by a Lycoming(?). The original Beagle E3/AOP11 prototype was G-ASCC and was a one-off. On the other hand this could be total BS and simply a re-engined AOP9 and nothing further! I do seem to remember that Major Mike Somerton-Raynor at Middle Wallop had something to so with this aircraft at some point in its life. Open to be told this is total cr*p!!!!

    Its the one from Middle Wallop. Interestingly a friend of mine was at Spanhoe (where the picture in Flypast was taken) and he was told that the conversion on the aircraft was carried out by Beagle. I am not sure of the accuracey of this though.

    G-ASCC, the only AOP 11, is still owned by Peter Bolton (International Auster Club membership secretary) and based at his strip near Nottingham.

    in reply to: Austers v Piper Cubs #436499
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Always a good way to start a spirited ‘discussion’. I have flown both and own one. I have about 1.5hrs on a Cub and about 5hrs on an Auster. So guess which I own? yes, the ‘oyster’, a pure 1946 J1 powered by a lovely little Cirrus Minor 2. You would be lucky to get the quoted 100hp from the Cirrus on a good day with a following wind. As for the handling, both are reasonably forgiving but do not suffer fools. As for the so called dreaded Auster bounce on landing I have yet to suffer it, a matter of a good approach, at slow speed, well judged flare, at the right height, hold off, the closer the ground gets the further back you come with the stick, if you suffer a little ‘spip’ just keep the stick back, provided it is not a heavy one, in which case ease off-fullpower and go round. My greatest problem is getting off in a streight line with out using up all of the width of the runway.

    Hi 1946

    You are lucky not to have suffered a bounce or two (or three), I did some horrendous one’s when converting on to the Auster. I preferred to come in on the slow side but my instructor was always accusing me of ‘dragging it in’.

    Managed to nip the wondering all over the runway in the bud though, my instructor just told me to a pick and object in the distance and keep lined up with it (there is usually a tree nearby that’s suitable). Anyway works for me.

    Are you attending the AGM at Leicester this month?

    in reply to: Austers v Piper Cubs #436562
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    I don’t like the AOP9, it’s engine looks a bit odd to me 😀

    I have been trying to work out whats odd looking about it, as it doesn’t look much different to a Gypsy engined one to me.

    I think the AOP 9 looks really ‘purposefull’

    A tad on the NOISY side though!

    in reply to: Austers v Piper Cubs #436571
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Piper cubs start from £10,000, Its what I was thinking of maybe getting.

    If you can find an airworthy J3 in the Uk for 10 grand, then my advice is to snap there hands off. The one I have flown has just been sold for twice that. No electrics, no radio. It went within two days of being advertised and there was no shortage of takers either. Second thoughts if you here of one at that price let me know and I will buy it.

    so you cruise at 130 kts instead of 90 kts, oooh big difference.

    Well no you dont actually. A J3 its about 65 MPH and a Super Cub about 85 MPH, and you have to remember that big old Lycoming in the Super Cub will be burning 6.5 to 7.0 imp gallons of finest Avgas an hour (at the best part of 5 quid a gallon).

    The second, even sadder thing, is that two beautiful Austers were flipped by a storm over Shotteswell strip on Friday night and will almost certainly be written off. (Pedants should note that one was actually a Beagle Terrier)

    I have seen the photograhs of the Terrier and it was a very distressing sight. If memory serves me well the Terrier was a converted Auster 6, so I guess it could be described as a Beagle or Auster. I know the owner of the other Auster (a particuarly rare variant), he is a total Auster man and I know how upset he must feel. 🙁

    Hello Auster fan. I like the cut of your gib, do you get to any strips near where you live? Northrepps perhaps? Perhaps I could demonstrate a landing to you first hand next time I am over that way. 😉

    in reply to: Help save the Beverley #1795439
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Some pictures of the dismantling on the Beverley Association’s website.

    Separately I see Newark Air Museum has acquired the cockpit of the ex- Southend Beverley from Duxford.

    in reply to: Old control tower at Hendon? #1801163
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Hers is a photo taken of it earlier in the year. I wonder if it could be moved to the RAF Museum site. I cannot see the surrounding land staying derelict for much longer.

    in reply to: Vanguard engine runs #1830990
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Steve

    Would there be anyway of finding out in advance, say the day before if you are going to be running / taxing as I would like to see and hear the old girl once more.

    Its a bit of a trek from where I am so I would not want to make the journey un-necessarily.

    in reply to: Vanguard engine runs #1831465
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The nose section at East Midlands is from G-APES ‘Swiftsure’. It was really sad that this aircraft was broken up. Hunting engineers at the time worked really hard (unoficially) to keep her complete in the hope she would be preserved, (it was rumoured to be going to Cosford). One engineer even rebuilt a Tyne and fitted it to the aircraft on the q/t in the hope of her being flown out.

    Sadly this was not the case and the aircraft was broken for scrap, a very sad sight at the time.

    in reply to: Vanguard engine runs #1831513
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    How many Vanguard’s are their left and could any others have their engines run again ?

    G-APEP – ‘Superb’ at Brooklands is the last complete Vanguard left, although there were a few hulks in store at Perpignan a few years ago (which have probably been scrapped by now).

    EP was the last Vanguard in commercial service being operated by Hunting Cargo Airlines at East Midlands Airport. It was donated to Brooklands by the Company and flown into the site in October 1996. I remember seeing them practice short field landings at EMA in preparation for the delivery flight, very impressive. 😮

    I must dig out the video!

    in reply to: Vanguard engine runs #1552257
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Hi Steve

    Thanks for the info.

    I am quite familiar with the old Vanguard and it has always been a favorite of mine, those Tynes sound great!

    Why will you not be able to run them again when she moves to the new site?

    in reply to: Why the Spitfire is THE greatest…. #1560189
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Shepherd Neme. After many years of complaints, they’re advertising campaign has (at least in London) be banned.

    “Downed all over Kent, just like the Luftwaffe”
    “The bottle of Britain”

    Well not quite. They were removed from the London underground (who had initially approved the ads). Because of alleged complaints from German tourists. 😡

    Press release

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 576 total)