dark light

Joe Petroni

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 576 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Meteor NF 11 WD686 #928161
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    It looks in a similar state to when it was sitting on the Bedford fire dump, from whence it came 🙁

    That’s a shame. Looking at pictures on the net, it looked quite smart after it’s restoration at Duxford. Was it just a shell back then?

    It appears the outer wing panels have been off for at least four years.

    in reply to: Meteor NF 11 WD686 #928176
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The Meteor was on display, fully assembled, for a number of years at the Muckleborough Collection.

    It has since been dismantled and removed to a remote area away from the museum. I got the impression it’s been there for quite a while.

    Perhaps they are waiting for the IWM to come and claim it back?

    in reply to: Shackleton WL795 #928213
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Is there room in the Classic Air Force hangar?

    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    For our Lancaster, we require 5000′ minimum.

    Thank you for your reply.

    At 3116′, East Kirkby is a little on the ‘tight’ side then!

    Presumably the runway is going to get an extension when Just Janes restoration is complete.

    in reply to: 3 Lancaster at East Kirkby, date released 2nd Sept 2014 #878769
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    It’s a shame the two Lancaster’s cannot land at East Kirkby.

    I wonder what the minimum runway is to operate a Lancaster from?

    in reply to: Merlin Flying Club Pageant – 7 June 2014. #900524
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The post code would suggest that this event is somewhere in the Nottingham area?

    Mark

    Hucknall Aerodrome. Probably the last year this will happen, as the airfield is shortly to become a housing estate.

    in reply to: Westland 30 #931099
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Often see the one at Norwich and wonder why they weren’t a success.

    They seem like a useful size. Were they all grounded at once?

    in reply to: Canadian Warplane Heritage – Lancaster- 2014 UK tour #966457
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    I don’t think anybody is accusing the Canadians of not doing due diligence, but the rules are pretty clear on carrying fare paying passengers. Like one or two posters above, I am interested on how they have got permission to do it.

    That issue aside I can’t wait to see it.

    in reply to: Another British Concorde Powered Up #992452
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Work continues on G-AXDN, with the nose lowering / raising mechanism starting to come back to life.:)

    https://www.facebook.com/groups/ConcordeHC/

    in reply to: Spitfire Running Costs #931267
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    What’s the TBO on a Merlin these days?

    I guess you would need to put in £200 to £300 / hr in just for the engine fund.

    in reply to: Bomber Command Memorial – Further Vandalism? #955163
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    One tiny positive from this thread, is that it made me go to the Bomber Command Memorial Website and donate £20.00.

    http://www.rafbf.org/1794/bomber-command-memorial.html

    It’s the least I could do.

    in reply to: Typhoon loan to Canada; no transit damage #959596
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    I am struggling to see how the spinner can be ex Hastings. It must have been some mod if it is, as last time I ran a Hercules on a Hastings it had four blades!

    in reply to: Another British Concorde Powered Up #959599
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Let’s hope the people in charge at Manchester see the good work being carried out at Duxford, and allow the team to finish the work they started on G-BOAC.

    in reply to: Preservation of our Industrial Heritage #966916
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Others who have had day to day contact with the CAA are better placed to give details but bottom line expectations and costs are spiralling for certification and I suspect this may lead to more aircraft moving abroad. The US, Aus and NZ seem to have struck a happy balance which has lead to many of the skills and projects heading in that direction. They seem to have a thriving business even in this climate….so it can work and be safe.

    Dave in your first post you accuse the CAA of potentially killing the warbird industry ‘stone dead’. I asked you for evidence to back this up, and you replied with another sweeping statement about costs ‘spiraling out of control’, but no evidence to support this claim.

    I really don’t see this, in fact quite the opposite.

    in reply to: Preservation of our Industrial Heritage #967937
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    re: CAA, I beg to differ on their effect on historic aircraft. The way that requirements have moved and what could possibly be upcoming (which will kill things stone dead) prices many of the airframes out of restoration to airworthy or even being able to keep aircraft airworthy. Fuel always will be and always has been a continual problem, that will not go away. The CAA will of course realise that something will have to be done however; will it be too late? who knows…I will just carry on with what I am doing and hope it gets sorted out in the end.

    I would be interested to hear more of what your referring to here. I am not aware of requirements changing that much, (although I am not really involved in historic’s much anymore). Apart from the Permit renewal fee, which is not bad, what are the big issues with the CAA keeping an aircraft airworthy?

Viewing 15 posts - 31 through 45 (of 576 total)