dark light

Joe Petroni

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 576 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Serviceable ones are around £1000 in the UK.

    Also depends which type you want, 12mm or 14mm spark plug, 3 or 4 bolt fixing. Later type have larger exhaust valve guides to take the sodium valves.

    Add also CFS at Coventry they have them, but see my top comment.

    in reply to: Brunty, best location to see last Ten arrive… WHERE? #940443
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    When 808 landed they let you in. Can’t see it being any different tomorrow.

    in reply to: Work starts on the CL-44 Guppy #958475
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Yes they can. Which is what makes this project so amazing.

    Yes they could, if it was on a register and had a ‘valid’ Certificate of Airworthiness.

    At the moment it is just like a museum aircraft. It would be like trying to ground the Victor at Bruntingthorpe!

    in reply to: BCWM's Jaguar GR.1 Roll-Out #977524
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    I seem to remember that the other Jaguars on the airfield are also without their engines.
    I wonder why they were removed , are they in storage at Bentwaters or were they sold off separately ??

    A lot were sold off separately. There is value in them due to all the Hawk operators around the world.

    in reply to: Bye Bye Argosy… #980340
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Apparently they had no pressing reason to preserve some ‘boring’ old propellor aircraft (not military, WWII etc). However, I have a supplementary question, are there any RR Darts still flying?. I once read somewhere that Viscount operators used to buy up withdrawn Viscounts in order to transfer the engines and use the remaining hours. It seems it was cheaper to do that than get Darts overhauled. In this current case the Darts seem to have been torn from the aircraft suggesting there was no market for them, at least not for Argosies. Practical issues aside, I would happily have put one in my garage.

    The engines were removed and sold when they first acquired the aircraft. I think what was in it when it was scrapped were just hulks to hang the prop’s on.

    The Darts fitted to the civil Argosy’s could be converted quite easily for other applications.

    Edited to add there are still a few 748’s and F27’s still flying.

    in reply to: Vulcan – Now cleared for full aerobatics? #994533
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The Vulcan has just been cleared for daytime IFR /IMC operations, the first Permit aircraft to have this restriction lifted.

    It will now be able to operate at higher levels, which will decrease the fuel burn and help prolong the fatigue life.

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #999211
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    When the plans where being looked at for the K4 tankers there was a great deal of consideration given to moving the airframes by road from Abingdon to Filton rather than doing the limited rebuild to fly. I have a soft spot for the VC10 tanker as I was the Manpower Planning Manager on the K4 programme

    Therefore it must be reasonably possible and probably no more challenging than the following

    Nimrod from Kemble to Cosford
    Victor from Shawbury to Cosford
    Valiant from Hendon to Cosford

    But they didn’t move them by road in the end.

    Reasonably possible? Possible maybe, weather you class it as reasonable depends on your point of view.

    l am basing my assumptions that we are talking about moving 808, which is effectively sitting on a disused airfield with no facilities or hangarage.

    The horizontal stab would have to be removed, which is about 40′ in the air and it’s massive. That would require two tail docks and working out in the open air. I have been up to on a scissor lift outside and it ain’t for the faint hearted! Then the vertical stab, again massive and no easy way to remove. You can’t cut it as it’s got to support the horizontal stab, which weighs a ton. All four engines out. The fuselage will need to be split as its too long. And then you’ve got the wings. No production breaks, so they will need to be chopped, after removing all the flaps, ailerons, leading edge devices, and then bodged back together.

    So we are talking £500k -750k and you will end up with a chopped and butchered aeroplane.

    In my view it would be significantly more challenging than any of the above aircraft.

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #999299
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    . However, if they can transport a Concorde across country to East Fortune, a VC to Cosford isn’t impossible!

    I think it would be cheaper to extend the runway at Cosford than try and move a VC-10 by road!

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #999341
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    RAF VC10’s only ever had two reverse thrusts fitted….

    When I did the Propulsion course at Brize the instructor did make reference to the VC-10 having four reverser’s, but the inboard two were deleted, because they weren’t needed and they caused tailplane buffeting issues. I got the impression, at the time, that the aircraft were delivered to the RAF with all four installed, but the two were removed at an early stage of the aircraft’s career.

    I know from experience it was perfectly possible to fit an outboard engine to the inboard position on a C1!:highly_amused:

    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Is there any oil in those engines?

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #1000029
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    does Brunty now have 2 VC10’s ?

    In addition to XR808 I saw two other substantially intact VC-10’s, they are on a pan at the western end. I understand that one these two was to remain intact as a runner, but doesn’t currently have any engines. I was told the plan is now to swap it for XR808.

    Regarding the BA VC-10 landing at Cosford. Did the civil VC-10’s retain all four reversers? The RAF deleted the inboard pair on their aircraft.

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #1000381
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Better volunteer then..

    They were actively looking for people with VC10 experience this morning. I have the mans card if you are interested.

    in reply to: VC-10 Retirement Thread (merged) #1000388
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Fecking unbelievable….. The most historic Ten that should be in the RAF museum…..
    I’m totally disgusted.

    It’s staying at Bruntingthorpe as a runner.

    Better than being stihl sawed into pieces and moved to Cosford I reckon.

    in reply to: Hornby (Airfix / Corgi) Reports Big Loss! #970063
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Well, I tried in god knows how many stores to get the Mk XII spitfire for my son, funny thing is, it’s not in production anymore, yet it’s still advertised. I love airfix and hornby but – get there acts together and sort it out. But I guess it’s the British way, profit first quality last sod the customer then blame the customer —
    Britains finished I’m sad to say.

    Amazing.

    From your inability to procure, a seemingly readily available plastic kit, you have written off a whole Country.

    in reply to: Spitfire spat….! #977017
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Looks and sounds like it could be quite amusing. Lets hope we get to see it.

Viewing 15 posts - 46 through 60 (of 576 total)