dark light

Joe Petroni

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 576 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Flying with a Mosquito-in Britain! #995811
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The Mosquito wouldn’t need BAE product support.

    The only way a Mosquito would need support from an appropriate organisation (not necessary BAE) is if the CAA classed the aircraft as ‘complex’. As the DH Sea Vixen is in the ‘intermediate’ category, I hardly think that likely.

    I am not aware of any warbirds, of British manufacture, that have manufactures support anymore.

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Channel 5 tonight #1017383
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Just checked the Radio TImes.

    “Edited for violence and language”.

    Of course we wouldn’t want a film about World War Two depicting any violence.

    Good job there wasn’t a black Labrador involved.

    Oh hang on a minute….

    in reply to: Battle of Britain Channel 5 tonight #1017390
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Polish Pilot – “good ufter-noon”

    Farmer – “Good afternoo my a@se – you bosch b@@tard”

    They cut that bit out.

    Ridiculous.

    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Rumour on PPRuNe is that the aircraft is to be scrapped!

    Would be a terrible shame if it is. How about it Twin Otter23 is it worth making a call?

    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    Rumour on PPRuNe is that the aircraft is to be scrapped!

    Would be a terrible shame if it is. How about it Twin Otter23 is it worth making a call?

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1022937
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    No indeed, why on earth would Woodford be included? It was only built, tested and delivered from there. :rolleyes:

    Because it is a tribute to the OEM’s, some of whom still support the aircraft.

    Staverton, Cottesmore, Scampton and Waddington now added.

    http://mxm.mxmfb.com/rsps/wlnk/c/1216/r/212287/e/417

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1035976
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    No indeed, why on earth would Woodford be included? It was only built, tested and delivered from there. :rolleyes:

    Because it is a tribute to the OEM’s, some of whom still support the aircraft.

    Staverton, Cottesmore, Scampton and Waddington now added.

    http://mxm.mxmfb.com/rsps/wlnk/c/1216/r/212287/e/417

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1023032
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    So its not flying over where it was built -where it left service with the RAF and where the most significant Vulcan sortie started in RAF history !

    Why should it? That is not the aim of the flight.

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1036090
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    So its not flying over where it was built -where it left service with the RAF and where the most significant Vulcan sortie started in RAF history !

    Why should it? That is not the aim of the flight.

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1023316
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The timings are going to published in the Vulcan newsletter, due out later today.

    The sortie is planned for three hours, and Halton is the last fly past before returning to Doncaster. Based on previous flights, my guesstimate would be 16:00.

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1036415
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    The timings are going to published in the Vulcan newsletter, due out later today.

    The sortie is planned for three hours, and Halton is the last fly past before returning to Doncaster. Based on previous flights, my guesstimate would be 16:00.

    in reply to: New Air Museum Opens in China #1024439
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    I read that as Newark Air Museum opens in China!

    Got as far as considering if they had made replicas of everything before I relaised my mistake. 😮

    in reply to: New Air Museum Opens in China #1037704
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    I read that as Newark Air Museum opens in China!

    Got as far as considering if they had made replicas of everything before I relaised my mistake. 😮

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1024616
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    You’ll have to enligten us then as the rationale wasn’t due to be published until tomorrow.

    If it was for the benefit of sponsors then fair enough no-one has a problem with that but it is a long way from being a “tour of various airports near to sites that played a significant part in their development or service life”

    It isn’t going anywhere near most of them.

    Still I’m sure the rationale behind the route will make it all clear. :rolleyes:

    The rationale is what I stated in my post.

    Clearly it cannot fly over every single location ever associated with the development and operation of the Vulcan.

    Specific details on the route chosen will be published tomorrow (I understand). Off the top of my head I can see connections with most of them.

    in reply to: XH558 Anniversary Tour Route #1037922
    Joe Petroni
    Participant

    You’ll have to enligten us then as the rationale wasn’t due to be published until tomorrow.

    If it was for the benefit of sponsors then fair enough no-one has a problem with that but it is a long way from being a “tour of various airports near to sites that played a significant part in their development or service life”

    It isn’t going anywhere near most of them.

    Still I’m sure the rationale behind the route will make it all clear. :rolleyes:

    The rationale is what I stated in my post.

    Clearly it cannot fly over every single location ever associated with the development and operation of the Vulcan.

    Specific details on the route chosen will be published tomorrow (I understand). Off the top of my head I can see connections with most of them.

Viewing 15 posts - 76 through 90 (of 576 total)