dark light

Tempest414

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 930 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon Discussion and News 2014 #2251865
    Tempest414
    Participant

    No, its him that’s wrong. If you want a long range deep strike capability then a single 1,000lt drop tank and 5t of internal fuel isn’t going to be enough in most scenarios. And the last time I checked the RAF weren’t exactly overwhelmed with AAR aircraft in their arsenal.

    He’s just selling a sob story for the latter because SDSR 2015 is quickly approaching.

    you are right however the RAF will have 22 A400’s which are AAR capable the only thing stopping the 400’s from tanking is that little thing of a contract that stops them

    Tempest414
    Participant

    Yep, we did. We had local permission from the RAF Sq Leader who ran the Cadets Gliding School during 2012-13, plus permission from the MoD land agents who run all military airfields. This post was changed in late 2013 and the gliding school was run now by a Ft Lt (but he was also supportive of the event), so we continued with the planning. At this point we had no negetive feedback but were just dealing with the usual issues of corporate sponsorship, site & traffic management etc. All aircraft bookings had also been made.

    The issue was that during 2014, the CO of all RAF gliding schools changed and the new postholder adopted a negetive attitude towards the event (risk management) and it was he who pulled the plug on us in October. As Corporate Members of BADA (British Air Display Association), we even asked them to intercede on our behalf but, alas, even they could not over-turn the decision. Evidently we are just one of several civilan run airshows at UK military airfields that have been similarily affected by this new risk-adverse viewpoint.

    As we were trying to raise funds for the RAF Benevolent Fund, we had to inform them of the decision and they also thought it reflected poorly on the “RAF family” – plus they’re now out maybe £10K in funds?

    Has anyone spoken to HQ Air Cadets at RAF Cranwell as they command 2FTS now

    in reply to: UK shortage of Frigates and Destroyers #2026237
    Tempest414
    Participant

    Yep maybe but I do think a radar upgrade to Scanter 4100 and fitting of a 30mm cannon would be a good move and maybe fitting a scaneagle system to give an eyes over the horizon capability

    in reply to: UK shortage of Frigates and Destroyers #2026306
    Tempest414
    Participant

    HMS Severn set sail for her deployment on APN for 8 months on Friday the 28th Nov. As said what use she will be there will remain to be seen all that said good luck to her crew

    in reply to: UK shortage of Frigates and Destroyers #2026485
    Tempest414
    Participant

    If the Navy are going to start using the River class in this way should they be upgraded with Scanter 4100 radars 30mm cannon and a flight deck. With the Tyne- Severn and Mersey still having 10 to 15 years service left that would bring all 7 ships of the class up to one standard in sensors weapons and helicopter support all be it the new 90m ships will be that bit more capable

    in reply to: UK shortage of Frigates and Destroyers #2026506
    Tempest414
    Participant

    wasn’t it only HMS Clyde that got scanter and the other 3 only got Kelven Hughes nav radars

    in reply to: UK shortage of Frigates and Destroyers #2026518
    Tempest414
    Participant

    the thing is how useful will she be on this tasking. No real radar to speak of and no helicopter

    in reply to: UK shortage of Frigates and Destroyers #2026528
    Tempest414
    Participant

    with HMS Seven about to leave UK waters for the first time on operations and head for the Caribbean for an Atlantic Patrol North mission over the winter, taking over from HMS Argyll. is this a sign of how few ship the Navy have or is it a testing of the water

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2211714
    Tempest414
    Participant

    Because Colombia is of course happily using its Kfir force. And Ar don’t know anything about that…

    No, let the gramp at rest in the Negev. There is no need to make a big hole in their OP budget. Leasing some Grip C/D, some F16 or even a modestly upgraded F1 makes more sense than everything else.

    so where are they going to get said Gripen’s – F-16’s and F-1’s from then or have you not been keeping up?

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2211850
    Tempest414
    Participant

    I think he meant the Korean FA-50 as a Multi-role fighter both TA-50 and FA-50 have the speed to carry out intercepts which the IA-63 dose not

    in reply to: How would you re-build the Argentinian military aviation? #2211886
    Tempest414
    Participant

    As said many times I think they need to rethink and make some simple changes that will have a big step up in capability and keep operational costs down

    Firstly as said make all flight training Tri service up to OCU with Basic training and all helicopter training on 1 base and Fast jet and Multi engine training on 1 base

    secondly buy 18 Kfir blk 60 fighters for the QRA and start to work their pilot up for the multi-role task and kfir should be good up to 2035. their need then to work hard to find and inducted a new type by 2025 to replace the A-4’s

    thirdly bring all fixed wing transport tasking under the Airforce on 3 types 2 x 767 MRTT’s – 6 x C-295’s and 6 C-130’s (to be replaced by KC-390)

    Tempest414
    Participant

    The Aussies say the F-18F has all the good points of legacy Hornet but with much better battle space management in the A2A and A2G roles

    as for poor acceleration I had not heard of it before and if it dose then it is down to the pilot to manage the airspeed when in the fight

    I have to say if I was tasked with buying a 100 new fighters today and had no ties I would be taking a hard long look at Advanced Super Hornet

    Tempest414
    Participant

    I think advanced super hornet could still come good for Boeing. If Canada is hoist with its self it needs a twin engine jet up north and dose not need F-35 and as F-35 becomes more and more expensive F-18 could pick up some air-forces that fall away however it has to fight with gripen in the market place

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2212676
    Tempest414
    Participant

    The South American market could open up to SAAB through the late 2020’s. back in late 2012 I said that in the 2015-2035 time frame this market would be looking to replace some 400 air-frames. Brazil has opened that account with Gripen and Colombia and Argentina are sniffing at new type’s or new to them. Chile may also start to look at Gripen for 2025

    in reply to: Saab Gripen & Gripen NG thread #3 #2214079
    Tempest414
    Participant

    The combination of indignation, whining, and general butthurt exhibited by many of our British posters here is rather unbecoming, but certainly amusing.

    In past I have supported Argentinian modernization and still do and feel they need at least 4 Frasser OPV-80 ships better transport helicopters and of course new interceptors just for starters but as I have have also said in the past most of all they need to change there thinking gripen or no gripen there is a lot of work to do before the air-force will be back to fighting force

    What is also amusing is none realistic posters

Viewing 15 posts - 181 through 195 (of 930 total)