dark light

Tempest414

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 930 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2274676
    Tempest414
    Participant

    Are you talking about the same a/c carrier as the one on which the Rafale was qualified 20 years ago ? :sleeping:

    it is true that Rafale carried out sea trials on Foch but it has been said on other threads that Rafale was or is unsuited to extended operations on this carrier it is one thing to test one or two aircraft for a few day or weeks it is another to operate 10 to 15 for for up to 4 months around the clock at war

    the lifts are rated at 15 tons a loaded Rafale is more like 19 ton

    but you are right Rafale has flown off Foch

    in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2275249
    Tempest414
    Participant

    SAAB say they have completed the design work for Sea Gripen they say it will have the same engine – sensors and avionics fit as the E/F will cost $4000 per flight hour including fuel and can be operated for 30-40 years dependent on mission rates

    Now if this is right and its on their site this would make Gripen the only modern type other than F-35B that could operate from the Brazilian carrier which in turn would make Gripen E/F a very good move for the air force due to common parts

    as said some time ago I think they should buy 50 Gripens now add to this 20 Sea Gripens and as part of the deal look to join SAAB and Turkey on a 5.5 gen type

    in reply to: Flanker or Fulcrum variant for Iraq in next 15 years? #2276525
    Tempest414
    Participant

    The way I see it Iraq has a number of air forces around it that have 350 to 400+ combat jets in Turkey –Israel – Saudi – Egypt and some smaller ones like Iran and Jordan who have about 150 jets with this in mind Iraq will need to be thinking of 200 to 250 combat jets to keep step so with that in mind

    One way would be

    50 Su-30’s top end
    50 F-16’s mid range
    100-150 JF-17 Block 2’s

    This would give them 3 BVR multi-role types which will act as a good deterrent and help keep their neutrality
    Another way is

    75 Su-30’s
    75 J-10B’s
    50 F-16’s

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2277488
    Tempest414
    Participant

    I know this may be a bit off-topic but what is with the Victor’s door? It looks a bit over-engineered to me.

    Rear crew did not have ejection seats and the door helped them get out in flight

    in reply to: Brazil closer to Boeing on jets deal after Biden visit #2277570
    Tempest414
    Participant

    Brazil will not buy a new fighter type this side of 2020 and if they do take on a new type before then it will be leased like Gripen

    in reply to: Flanker or Fulcrum variant for Iraq in next 15 years? #2277716
    Tempest414
    Participant

    I have to say 30 or so refurbished Mig-31’s to E+ standard could work. Iraq can not trust that US will not pull support for the F-16’s or allow them to fight when needed however the F-16 is a good type as a point defence fighter and here to stay so with this in mind I think a good mix would be

    30 Mig-31’s 2 Squadrons of 12 + 6 in deep maintenance with a aim of having 20 on duty each day

    50 SU-30’s 3 Squadron of 12 an OCU of 8 + 6 in deep maintenance with a aim of having 37 on duty each day

    50 F-16 3 Squadron of 12 an OCU of 8 + 6 in deep maintenance with a aim of having 37 on duty each day

    possible look at having 50 J-10B’s same split

    Each type would have a home base with a Simulator and maintenance-Logistics units. Each base would have a squadron on detachment at all times to a forward base with maintenance and logistics support. I would also like to see a AEW&C Type in the mix’s

    with this set up it would give the air force 94 duty air-frames a day and if J-10B was added 131 duty air-frames a day

    in reply to: Typhoon vs J-10 for Iraq #2278735
    Tempest414
    Participant

    add to this that the US operates one of the most divers air-forces in the world and will do well past when I am gone and in a hole when you look at the region all the air-forces that matter operate multiple types from multiple countries even the most up to date ones

    in reply to: Typhoon vs J-10 for Iraq #2278761
    Tempest414
    Participant

    Yep the key here is if they go for Su-30 then buy J-10 make sure they run the same engine this could be better for China as they could build the air-frames and fit the avionics around the Russian AL-31 for export and keep the WS-10B for its own program I see this as a win win

    the same goes for the Mig-35 JF-17 option

    in reply to: Future of the Dutch JSS #2036513
    Tempest414
    Participant

    It could be a good move for Russia to go along side the new Mistral class in the Pacific Fleet

    in reply to: Typhoon vs J-10 for Iraq #2279382
    Tempest414
    Participant

    The Mig-35 would be a good type however the SU-30 would be a better bet it is around in good numbers has a clear development path in both Russia and China this said if Iraq did go for Mig-35 and then JF-17 then they could have two types with one engine type

    in reply to: Future of the Dutch JSS #2036531
    Tempest414
    Participant

    The Indonesians have got 4 Makassar Class ships which cost them 150 million US or 37.5 Million US each add to this that Peru is now building two more ships of this class I think that Brazil and Chile would be better off building Makassar class ship in they home ship yards
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]222073[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]222072[/ATTACH]

    in reply to: Typhoon vs J-10 for Iraq #2279451
    Tempest414
    Participant

    Now that Iraq has gone for F-16 it will need to think about tankers unless they use them in the point defence role only anyone who has used F-16 in the strike role has had to have tanker support the US operating out of Turkey in 2003 where topping up before and after strikes in Iraq for me they should stick at 36 F-16’s and look to buy 30 SU-30’s for the long-range interceptor – strike role add to this 60 Jf-17’s as a low cost multiplier able to undertake basic CAS and point defences tasks and if they want more than JF-17 then go for Grippen E

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2283315
    Tempest414
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]221683[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]221685[/ATTACH]
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]221688[/ATTACH]

    Some more RAF art

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2283323
    Tempest414
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]221680[/ATTACH]
    an A-10

    in reply to: Nose Art 1970's – Present??? #2283559
    Tempest414
    Participant

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]221634[/ATTACH]

    Another Su-25 pic

Viewing 15 posts - 391 through 405 (of 930 total)