dark light

galdri

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,150 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Soap drinking , leg biting and hand cuffs #550494
    galdri
    Participant

    Airline crews are equipped with tools like plastic handcuffs

    They are anything but plastic on Air France! Try asking the guy I was fighting for three hours AFTER he was handcuffed on an Air France flight last year. I would not have wanted to wake up severly hung over from all the stuff he was taking with all the marks of the NOT plastic handcuffs on my arms.

    in reply to: Lurgashall crash #1177851
    galdri
    Participant

    He must be a popular man:diablo::D:D

    in reply to: Help to identify two RAF members #1183865
    galdri
    Participant

    Those two guys might not even have been shot down by Höhler. Could they have been “entertained” at some airfield Höhler was based at?? Shot down by someone else (probably) but a good photo oportunity with Höhler at his base??

    I know I´m not helping very much:o

    in reply to: Vimy to be grounded to Brooklands #1184333
    galdri
    Participant

    – how does it fly in the UK at the moment, but won’t be able to when at Brooklands?

    It is flying in the UK at the moment on a 28 day exemption rule. It is an ICAO thing which allows foreigin aircraft with limited airworthieness (for example the US experimental category) to fly in any country for up to 28 days without having to fulfill local airworthiness requirements. Normally the 28 days are taken to be consecutive days (so one month from date of entry). However, I understand that the UK CAA has agreed to look at it as FLYING days for this aircraft, ie. the aircraft can FLY for 28 days over a period of years. So, the aircraft will, as the situation looks now, only fly these 28 days and no more. How much of these 28 days have been used up, I do not know, or if some other plans are afoot to keep it flying afterwards. The most logical course of action would be to get it onto UK Permit to Fly, but as has been pointed out, it might be problematic and will cost tons of money.

    The aircraft can not fly at Brooklands because there is no runway there to operate it from.

    in reply to: aircraft graveyard in Dubai? #1184349
    galdri
    Participant

    I was at Sharjah a little over a week ago. All the old stuff has now been cleared out and the airport looks empty. The operations that used to be at Sharjah have now been moved to Fujairah on the east coast of the Emerates and to sem extend to Ras el Khamah further north.

    To give you an idea, here is a taster of what Fujairah looks like. This Il-18 is registered as EX-75466 and has National Paint titles on the lower left fuselage. National Paint is an airline that is suspected to be/have been associated with Victor Bout, the famous arms smuggler/blockade runner. Behind it you can see rows upon rows of AN-12´s and AN-24´s. This Il-18 is still flying.
    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d22/Galdri/Il-18-7.jpg

    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d22/Galdri/Il-18-6.jpg

    Here is a photo of another Il-18 with suspected Victor Bout connections. It is EX-505 formerly (presently??) of Anikay Airlines. It is still a flyer.
    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d22/Galdri/Il-18-2.jpg

    Yet another Il-18 with dodgy past (and probably present). UP-I1801 of Mega Airlines yet another airline with suspected connections to Victor Bout! In the background Il-76´s are visible.
    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d22/Galdri/Il-18-5.jpg

    A general picture of the west side of the ramp.
    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d22/Galdri/DC-8-4.jpg

    This is ony a very small portion of the aircraft that are sitting around this airport. I would not be surprised if there were close to 100 aircraft sitting around there!

    in reply to: Dambusters remake Lanc unveiled #1184692
    galdri
    Participant

    Neither the Stirling nor the Halifax would have the load carrying capabilities. Upkeep was just short of 10 000 pounds.

    in reply to: Vimy to be grounded to Brooklands #1186644
    galdri
    Participant

    Proctor,
    We have different point of view here. Mr. Lang would not have gone very far without the finencial backing of reputable organizations/individuals. I´ll never be the one to belittle his contribution in seeing the job through.

    HOWEVER, whoever held the title to the aircraft at the time (and remember, it has had some highs and lows in it´s time), decided to donate it to the Brooklands Museum. You can not fault that. The owner decided that the aircraft was more relevant to an English musem than an Australian one. This particular replica did re-fly all the long-distance flights flown by the Vimy, they either started or ended in the UK. I, for one, could not think of a better place for it than the UK (and I´m not even english!!! Just a stupid Icelander).

    At the time of the donation of the aircraft to the Brooklands Museum, was Mr. Lang still the owner of the aircraft?

    in reply to: Vimy to be grounded to Brooklands #1186704
    galdri
    Participant

    Really this aeroplane has very little to do with England.

    cheers

    Other than the fact that the owners decided, after the Atlantic crossing, to donate it to the Brooklands Museum:rolleyes:. They did not donate it to Austrialia. For their own reasons the decided that Brooklands was the right home for it.

    It you want a Vimy in the southern hemisphere, you´ll have to build one. I would not be surprised if a certain director is toying with the idea!

    in reply to: F-100 Question #1198729
    galdri
    Participant

    Phantom,
    While I have no expert knowledge of the F-100 as such, from what little I´ve read about the early problems of inflight break ups they seem to have been caused by neutral or even negative yaw stability leading to a dutch roll, which at high speed was violent enough to tear the airframe apart.

    A short (laymans terms) description of Dutch roll (and no, I´m not an aerodynamist;)). Dutch roll is caused by a yaw upset which will lead to the wing on the outside of the yaw travel “faster” through the air creating more lift than the inside “slower” wing. The aircraft will start to bank to the same side as applied yaw. As the up going wing is now producing more lift than the downgoing wing it will also be producing more induced drag (drag caused by the creation of lift). As the drag on the up going wing increases with the lift, the drag will finally slow that wing down relative to the speed of the aircraft. You could say it was like someone was pulling the wing back yawing the aircraft to the other side and the other wing will start producing more lift banking the aircraft the other way around. This way, you end up in a cycle that gets more and more vicious each time if nothing is done to stop it.

    Dutch rolls (yaw – roll coupling) are very pronounced on swept wing aircraft with low yaw stability because once the yaw starts the wing on the out side of the yaw will present a greater wing area to the airflow enabling it to produce lots of more lift for realatively low changes in yaw.

    To fix yaw instability install bigger tailfins or strakes.

    Hope this made some sense!

    in reply to: Duck egg green .. or.. #1203929
    galdri
    Participant

    Christ guys. Get a grip:eek: This many pages splitting hairs over a paint hue? Someone needs to get a live.

    Expecially as the correct answer can never been found;)

    in reply to: Duck egg green .. or.. #1205958
    galdri
    Participant

    I’m more interested in how much lanolin paint was used on BOAC flying boats. 😉

    Then you are in for the full half an hour argument:diablo::D:D

    in reply to: Duck egg green .. or.. #1206281
    galdri
    Participant

    I´ve been watching this thread develop with great interest, as I´ve been studying aircraft colours in general in a very amateurish way. The following are just generic observations I´ve come up with.

    1. There might have been official order regarding how a paint should look like, but exact “hue” (or colour) will vary depending on the producer and may even differ between batches from the same manufacturer. A good case in point is a friend of mine who is restoring a Piper Pacer that decided to paint it with coloured dope (he must be MAD:D). He did not buy enough of the red stuff the first time around, so ordered more from the same manufacturer with the same colour code as the first batch he received. What he got was from another mix (batch) and it had a very different hue to it. It was very noticable that it was different. He sent the cans back to try and get the same colour, and then got yet another hue that was not the same as the first or the second one! The third time he got a mix that is nearly the same, but not quite. He is going to use it, even if it is a little off.

    2. Who is holding the spray can?? The same colour can, and will, look differently depending on who is holding the spray can. How much do they dare putting on before the paint begins to run? Some will spray relatively thin layer over the primer, just to get the colour on. Others will go all the way and apply a heavy coat until the paint is just about to run. If two painters use the same paint, from the same manufacturer, from the same batch, you could probably see variations in colour in the finished version.

    3. There is no such thing as a “correct” colour.

    4. Computer monitors are completely useless things to asses colours.

    in reply to: Shackleton fuel? #1211712
    galdri
    Participant

    To go a bit OT:eek: I seem to remember from my ground school on the Twin Otter, that the PT-6 turbo prop engines will run quite happily on AVGAS and it is certified for use in that engine as a “get me home” last resort. IIRC there was a limitation of 150 hours of running time on AVGAS during the engine live.

    in reply to: Stampe Crunched at Goodwood #1216639
    galdri
    Participant

    Exactly. These things are never “write offs” as long as you can use the data plate. They are “simple” to rebuild and provided someone has deep enough pockets, they will always resurface later. It has to be a labour of love thought, as flying examples will always be a cheaper option for the prospective buyer of the type.

    in reply to: Worst British aircraft of W.W.II #1221259
    galdri
    Participant

    Ok, there was a slight thread creap, but not going as far a Germany:D

Viewing 15 posts - 226 through 240 (of 1,150 total)