dark light

galdri

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,150 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Magistrate slams Qantas over drunken passenger #559683
    galdri
    Participant

    I wonder if the “stewards” are trained to deal with drunks in the first place?

    I can assure you they are. And they can fight them too:eek: I was involved in a “fight” lasting three hours on an Air France flight last year, so I think I know what goes on! Luckily we had four men as stewards (+ one man that was a girl) on that flight. If anyone wants to know the details, I can give them.

    in reply to: Worst British aircraft of W.W.II #1221274
    galdri
    Participant

    Lankhaar, I think you have read the thread title incorrectly. It is only about British aircraft, and the Me 210 is not british!

    Anyway, to add my 2 p´s worth, I´d say the worst british aircraft of WW II was the Botha. It was a complete failure in all respects. Most other aircraft that failed in their designed role had a second lease of live in some other roles.
    Albemarle was “useful” as a glider tug/para ship
    Fairey Battle was past it´s sell by date when war was declared but did well in the training role
    Manchester– there was nothing wrong with the basic design. Only engine problems. See what happened when it was powered by real engines
    Hector a good aircraft, but flying in the wrong war! No fault of the aircraft
    Barracuda. I think it was more of a training problem for the pilots. It sure looks ugly, but I think most of it´s bad reputation has to do with Stringbag pilot being let loose on the aircraft without thorough check-outs. You can not do Stringbag stuff on the Barra.
    Defiant, nothing wrong with the aircraft per see. It was just based on wrong assumstions about the defence of British Isles. It did resonably well as nightfighter when few other things were available.

    I could go on and on.

    in reply to: Concorde flies again! #560202
    galdri
    Participant

    Now, that´s a good one:D:D:D

    I was inside that aircraft a week ago, and I can tell you that thing is not going anywhere in a hurry:D:D

    April 1st. and all that!

    in reply to: Geodetics – good or bad? #1226132
    galdri
    Participant

    unwilling to flex in most directions.
    Ben

    Nasho – fascinating.

    Guys, I know nothing about what you are talking about, BUT, would like to add my 2 p´s worth. As I´ve read, the Wimpy was unusable as a glider tug Because of excessive flexing of the fuselage! It is a long time since I read this, and this is purely from memory. But how many Wimpies have you seen as used as glider tugs? I´m willing to be proved wrong, as usual:eek::eek:

    Nashio, maybe the balsa/glue combination in your experiment reacts different to alloy rivited/bolted together?? I just do not know, just a questionþ

    in reply to: Fedex cargo plane crashes at Narita Airport, Japan #562043
    galdri
    Participant

    only stirring the pot… :diablo:

    You are indeed:D:D

    in reply to: Flight 3407 prelim report #562045
    galdri
    Participant

    I do not know what sources AD has, but the only thing available from the official body handling the investigation is on the following link:
    http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=20090213X13613&key=1

    Not much I´m afraid.

    AD is probably useing various newspaper reports to come up with the stuff in the first post. We all know how much we can trust the newspapers:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Emirates A345 tail strike at Melbourne #562047
    galdri
    Participant

    Isn´t a tail strike a normal procedure in planes testing?. I suppose it´s a terrifying experience, but I don´t know to what stance it´s risky.

    Tail strike as such is not included in the testing of new aircraft types. What they are testing when the tail hits the runway during testing is what is called minimum unstick speed, and that unit is used for further performance calculations for V speeds. The test aircraft have been modified to minimize structural damage by re-enforceing of the structure and a skid.

    Normal line aircraft do not have those modifications and a tailstrike will resault in structural damage, and on many types the rear part of the pressurized area will be damaged resaulting in inability to to pressurize the aircraft, or if pressuriztion is possible, will significantly increase the chances of an explosive decompression later on.

    So, tail strikes are not to be taken lightly.

    in reply to: For Sale: 747-400 for a measly $10 million!!! #565955
    galdri
    Participant

    Is the price good??
    We do not know if the engines are included in the price and if they are, how much live they have left. A PW/GE or what ever is on the wing is not cheap and you are going to need four of them! What is the lifetime left on various other lifed items? Does the aircraft need an extended C or even D check?

    Aircraft shopping is serious buisness as some airlines have found out in the past. I can remember one european airline which bought three A-300B4´s in the american desert about 10 years ago. The price was unbelievable, they just could not pass this deal!! The aircraft are then ferried to Hamburg for freight conversion, when there it was found out that they were due for an a D check (OK it was in for heavy maintainance anyway!). One day the companies rep walked onto the shop floor to find the mechanic hoisting the engines off the wings of all three aircraft. He was, understandibly, a bit cross. Only to be told that the engines had not been included in the sale:eek: Yes, some heads were left rolling within the company after that Airbus incident.

    I can think of many more instances where airlines have swallowed a “too good to be true” deals, and in some instances they have been left bankrupt for not reading the small print.

    in reply to: Tenerife. Historic Aviation ?? #1163694
    galdri
    Participant

    The famous 747 accident happened at Tenerife North. It is still a busy airport and you would not be able to access it. From what I could see, nothing remained last spring.

    The DC-7 was located at Las Palmas (different Island). It was scrapped last December. Here is a photo I took of it last spring when it was waiting for the scrapman:eek:
    http://i32.photobucket.com/albums/d22/Galdri/021.jpg

    in reply to: Mosquito TA122 assembled! #1163784
    galdri
    Participant

    Really great news:D You can never have too many Mossies!

    I´ll never forget the day in August 2000 when me and my friend visited the Museum and had a chance to sit in the cockpit of the prototype:D Just great! The Mossie looks like a big aircraft when you stand beside it, but boy, was it cramped inside!!! We were not very big at the time, my friend and I, and didn´t wear the flying clothing of 1940. It was still positively cramped in there. Looking out the window and seeing the two massive Merlins on each side, I could just about imagine the noise in there with 1940´s headsets/flying helmets on. My admiration for the men that flew Mossies into battle grew a lot after that visit to the cockpit. They were made of sterner stuff than I´am!!

    This is a late big THANK YOU to they guys at the museum for the chance to experience this:D:D

    in reply to: Miles / HP Marathon survivors #1163802
    galdri
    Participant

    You wouldn´t happen to have a date for the scrappings do you??

    in reply to: Storch #1163811
    galdri
    Participant

    Thank you HP for a most informative post.

    I hope you will not be treating your Storch like they did in that youtube link you posted:eek:

    in reply to: Miles / HP Marathon survivors #1163819
    galdri
    Participant

    Marathons in Japan are probably a similar story as the Chinese Stirling. There are lot of stories, but few sightings! Last confirmed sighting (with a photo) was IIRC in the late 60´s.

    Marathons are not small aircraft, and as such difficault to hide. To have seen no photograph of the remains for about 40 odd years seems to indicate that they are no longer there. I´ll be more than happy to be proved wrong though:eek:

    in reply to: Storch First Flight at Old Warden – 11 Mar 09 #1167675
    galdri
    Participant

    Fantastic news. Congratulations to all involved in the restoration.
    Your new toy looks fab HP!:D

    in reply to: Hurricane incident at North Weald #1167678
    galdri
    Participant

    Good no one was injured, and the damage is not too great. It is going to cost a lot of money to repair though! I doubt Mr. PT has a spare engine laying around, so it will presumable be some months before it flys again.

    My thoughts are with the pilot. He is probably not a happy camper this evening.

Viewing 15 posts - 241 through 255 (of 1,150 total)