I think it would be much easier to build a completely new airframe to fit behind the Sabre. You could then call it the Tem-pit. Then try to get it registered with the CAA
In my airline we call out speed deviations +10/-5 kts from Vref with the “check speed” call out.
I do know that CVR recordings are not usually released, but it would be interesting to know what was going on in that cockpit at approx 1900 feet on the altimeter with throttles at idle and speed disappearing as well. A three man cockpit should surely be able to spot something wrong?:confused:
It begs the question: what was going on in that cockpit! Three pilots sitting in the cockpit, Autopilot/Autothrottle goes into land mode at about 1900 feet on the altimeter, airplane goes 40 kts below Vref, and apparently no-one had anything to say!
The barometric altimeter is not connected to the autoland function of the Autopilot/Autothrust. All autolands are done with reference to Radio Altimeter only. So it has to be a Radio Altimeter fault to cause the autothrust to close like it would do in a normal autolanding.
Sandy Topen`s stock of Miles Gemini/ Messenger parts many years ago……….Martin
Any idea where they would be nowadays?
I have read about large a/c being barrel rolled using very little ‘G’ (1 -2 ?) inc B47 by ‘Tex’ Johnson,
Not barrel rolled, but aileron rolled my friend. A whole lot of difference.
This really is a thread going nowhere.
I cannot blame Galdri for dropping out of it.
Personally I can’t wait for it to fall off the bottom of the page so I no longer have to visit it.
Moggy
Sorry Moggy. Just could not help myself making a reply. I´m just waiting for the “how wrong you are” replys:D:D I do not know anything about this and am just sat in my cosy armchair. In my armchair I know EVERYTHING:D:D I can even teach you how to fly the perfect display routine in a Whirlwind fighter without ever having seen the thing:D
I´m stupid, I know, being drawn into a sandbox like this.
I said I´d not participate any further in this thread a few minutes ago, and I´m already breaking that promise:eek:
Just a quick note to all of you, barrel roll and aileron roll are two different beasts altogether. They are miles apart in stesses on the airframe!
I do not know if my english is good enough to descripe the differences, but here goes.
A Barrel roll is basically a loop where the aircraft is rolled around to make an arch around the loop. To fly it, you pull sharply into a loop (depending on aircraft type, but typically around 3.0-4.0 g), at the same time you roll so as to achive 90° off axis at the apex of the loop and continue the loop/roll to achive level flight, wings level on more or less the original heading.
An Aileron roll on the other hand is a much simpler thing, both for the pilot and the airframe. Pull the nose up in a straight line to about 20° (airplanes may vary to the exact angle) with about 1.2-1.5 g acceleration, when at 20° pitch up, centralize the elevator and apply maximum aileron with co-ordinated rudder. At the end of the roll, the aircraft should finish with about 20° nose down attitude. The altitude gained with the 20° nose up pull should be preserved, so with about 1.5 g pull out from the resaulting dive you should end up at more or less the same altitude as when you started.
Slow rolls are a different beast altogether.
This is how the maestro of Icelandic aerobatics taught me. If he is wrong with all his hours, fair enough!
Anybody in particular G ?
A bit of a vague comment to say the least !
regards B
If I start calling names this will get ugly very quickly, so I´ll refrain from doing so. There are three posters at the top of the “amazement” list for me. You are not on that list, if that makes you feel any better.
This will be my last input on this thread, I think, unless something even more spectacular turns up. I´ll, however, turn to this thread if I want to see “experts” at work.
It would be nice, however, if all of those posting their “expert” views on the topic would include their credentials regarding display flying and warbird experience. It would take out a lot of the background clutter. Armchair aviators who have never flown anything, let alone a display with all the rules and regulations that comes with that, simply have no idea of what it is all about. One failed (stupid) roll at an airshow almost 30 years ago, is not applicable to airshows today.
To set an example, I´d like to have my own credential visible. I´ve done some aerobatic displays at airshows (about 20) in a CAP-10 and a numerous airshow appearances in J-3/PA-11 Cubs. Not a lot, I know, but a fair bit more than some of the “experts”
Over and out.
Regards,
Sigurjon
I´ve been watching this thread develop in utter amazement.
First of all, I´d like to thank JDK for some very balanced views, along with a few others who have their heads firmly attached to their bodies.
For the rest, what an utter tosh:mad: I´d like a show of hands please. Who has actually flown P1 in any aircraft? Who of you experts are qualified display pilots or warbird pilots (I know how are, but there seems to be more of them than I thought!).
Hummmmm, No hands showing from the “expert” brigade:eek:
Why would there be a three man crew ?
Jump seat occupant ? Cabin crew in cockpit ?
Or a check airman doing a Line Check or a safety pilot due to training underway.
EDIT:
Sky News have just now, about a minute ago, said there were three pilots on board, two pilots and one trainee pilot.
I need to correct the information I gave above. I´ve been in contact with Iceland´s premier WW2 Air Historian, Mr. Ragnar Ragnarsson, as I had a feeling he might have some info. And he had! Mr. Ragnarsson had copies of the original IWM´s photographs. The photos are IWM ref. CS63 and CS64. Mr. Ragnarsson was able to read two serials for sure. “K” is Z4575 and “D” (or “O” depending how you read the rectangular sign on the nose) is Z4048. He was not able to get conclusive serials for the other aircraft in the photograph.
Regarding the colours for the aircraft, I can not comment.
Oh and by the way, this picture is not taken at Kaldadarnes. It is taken in Reykjavik, and in the background is Mount Esja. It has snow on it´s slopes which to me would suggest the picture is taken autumn /winter 1941 In the background is Wellington of 221 squadron also based at Reykjavik.
I´ve been researching these very aircraft for some years now, and sadly, I think I can not tell you very much more than you know already. But this is what I know, mostly taken from an exelent book called Flugsaga Íslands í stríði og friði by Eggert Norðdahl.
1423 fighter flight came into being on the 10th of June 1941 when six aircraft arrived. They were Mk.II´s Z4575, Z4607, Z4617, Z4631, Z4639 and (Mk.I) Z4702. Pilots and Officers were from 98 squadron, and the flight was under administrative control of 98 squadron.
On the 15th of July, 1423 fighter flight became independent, when 98 squadron was disbanded. After that, it adobted the unofficial name “Air Defence Iceland”.
Later, or on the 26th of July, four more Hurricanes arrived. They were Z4037, Z4045, Z4048 and Z4049. That made a total of 10 Hurricanes for 1423 fighter flight. Two were supposed to be based at Kaldadarnes on readiness, and six were to be on readiness in Reykjavik. Two were to act as spares.
On the 23rd of September, 1423 fighter flight had it´s only casaulty in Iceland. Z4617 and Z4607 were scrambled from Reykjavik to intercept a German recce. Z4607 was last seen climbing into clouds, and crashed into the slopes of Mount Esja to the north east of Reykjavik at 09:45. The pilot, Sgt. H.A. Werrells was killed.
1423 fighter flight was disbanded in Descember 1941, and the remaining Hurricanes were shipped to the UK on the 22nd of Descember.
The in your post is probably the only known pictrue from 1423 fighter flight, and it is also reproduced in the book I quote above, although in slightly better quality. Stating the obvious, I would go so far as to say that the Hurricanes have no unit codes (98 squadron Battles didn´t have them either while they were here) The known individual aircraft letters are only known from this photograph and are “J” “F” “D” and “K” After much scrutiny af the picture in said book, I would venture as far as saying Z4631 could be “D”. I can not be sure, however. In the book the picture is credited to the Imperial War Museum, so maybe they have a higher resolution copy available to read the serials. For the other six aircraft we will probably never have a clue:(
All the best,
Sigurjon
Probably not, as it is only 1.5 million:D