dark light

galdri

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,150 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1171642
    galdri
    Participant

    I´ll say Ventura! Probably wrong though!

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1171648
    galdri
    Participant

    I´d say Lockheed Ventura/Harpoon or something like that. The engines on this wreck are too substancial to be from a Loadstar IMHO

    in reply to: Miles M.52 and the X-1 – again! #1171679
    galdri
    Participant

    Bits and bobs about the M-52 in the latest Miles Aircraft Collection Magazine.

    Peter Amos has researched this for over 50 years now, and he along with a fellow researcher (working equally long on the subject) have been unable to establish the true facts behind this cancellation. I think it is highly unlikely we are going to uncover the truth on the forum, nice as it would have been!

    in reply to: Miles Messenger memories #1171956
    galdri
    Participant

    I’ve got quite a lot of Messenger and Gemini pictures that I’ll scan when I get a moment and post on here.

    Any picture of Gemini G-AKEK? It is proving quite elusive! I´ve got two shots from the AJ collection, and one photo form Newcastle in 1970-72. That is all I´ve been able to find.

    galdri
    Participant

    Galdri

    I was just editing a posting that I was making and I hope that opens up the question a bit.

    I just noticed that. But still it is impossible to answer!! Let´s play the IF game for a moment. But the IF´s never stop! IF the U.S had not become involved in ETO, the Luftwaffe had not been hurt as much as it did. In that case, deep penetration by Bomber Command by night would have been very costly in the last two years of the war. But since they did participate, we only have to look at Albert Speer to see the effect of the Lancaster. I do not have my references at hand, but he is quoted as saying that British air attacks did more damage than american ones. (That can be directly linked to the Lancaster´s load carrying ability compared to the american types).

    And the IF game does not stop there. What IF Lancasters had been cleaned up a bit?? Loose the mid-upper turret, lots of armour etc. They would have been hard catch for Luftwaffe´s main night fighter in 1943/1944, the Me-110. Guy´s, we are going to go around in circles with this one!

    By the way the saying I have heard is “Those that can do…., those that can’t teach…., and those that can’t teach write books about it!

    cheers

    That is why I´ve never written a book. I think I can teach, as my Type Rating Instructor/Type Rating Examiner papers seem to imply. But I can not actually fly:D I´m always upside down for some strange reason.

    galdri
    Participant

    Proctor,
    Can you please clarify if your question is about these aircraft in RAF service only, or if you mean these aircraft in general in the ETO. If we get that cleared, we have some sort of firm ground to work with.

    But as many have said, this really is an impossible question to answer no matter what you mean.

    in reply to: Restorations for 2009 #1175480
    galdri
    Participant

    Did the German machine have metal wings or was that just from French production?

    I have just learned that only the French production aircraft had metal wings.

    Must admit I was a bit surprised by this.

    in reply to: Spitfire – 'Data plate specials' #1175482
    galdri
    Participant

    I cannot stand the Lycoming engined French Me 108 painted up as a 109

    That implies you have actually seen it:diablo: Which means it is not so bad after all!

    The Lycoming is a very reliable engine, and has enabled this aircraft to been flown quite a lot. I dear say more than if it had been engined with it´s original powerplant. For the owners that is a very important consideration. The aircraft keeps it´s basic shape, and the change is not irreversible. If someone down the line decides to have an original engine installed, that is very feasible as I understand the original engine mount was modified to take the Lyc.

    For the paint job, that is down to owners preferrance. He can paint it any way he likes. By the way, What colour is YOUR Bf-108:diablo::D:D

    in reply to: Halifax LV 857 #1177953
    galdri
    Participant

    Any further research would be best done through the Nation Archives at Kew. You know the time frame, from approx. begining of Febuary 1944 till the end of March. You can order the ORB (operation record book) for 51 squadron for that period, and get the complete movements of this particular Halifax. I´ll have to pay for it if you are not able to go there in person.

    If you are next of kind to an airman you can get his details as well, but at the moment I can not for the live of me remember the address. I´m sure someone will come along and provide it!

    in reply to: Halifax LV 857 #1177970
    galdri
    Participant

    Google is your friend:D

    Here is it´s demise:
    http://www.luftwaffe.cz/beckerm.html

    Appearantly the crew was on it´s third mission. See here:
    http://boards.ancestry.com/surnames.menary/22/mb.ashx

    From this site: http://www.lostbombers.co.uk/bomber.php?id=2953 You can get the delivery dates for the aircaft, and it reads as follows:
    Serial Range LV857 – LV883. 27 Halifax Mk.111. Part of a batch of 240 HP61 halifax Mk.B.111/A.V11. LV771-LV799; LV813-LV842; LV857-LV883; LV898-LV923; LV935-LV973; lV985-LV999; LW113-LW143; LW157-LW179; LW191-LW195 B.111; LW196-LW210 B.V11. Delivered by Handley Page (Cricklewood & Radlett) between 10Feb44 and 25Feb44.
    As can you can see, it had existed for about a month, which would have included a spell a MU (maintainance unit) so it would be fairly safe to say that it had only been with 51 squadron for a few weeks, and maybe this was it´s 3rd sortie as well?? By the way it´s squadron qoutes for the aircraft were MH+H2

    But I´m sure you know this all already.

    in reply to: Progress Shots on Proctor #1181573
    galdri
    Participant

    BTW fantastic pictures of your Proctor. I´ll not put any of the Gemini up on here, as it a 30 year project and will be slow

    What glue are you using? Looking at your photos I would say West System or similar??

    in reply to: Progress Shots on Proctor #1181584
    galdri
    Participant

    however makes it a bit of a pain in terms of getting hold of the ply (1.5mm).
    cheers

    Never mind the 1.5 mm. I´ve got some stacked:D Try getting hold of 1.2mm:eek: Aircraft spruce are not stocking it anymore. I´ve found a source in Germany for 1.2mm, but the price will make your eyes water:eek: Do you know of some outlet selling 1.2mm for “normal” price??

    in reply to: Avro Shackleton to fly again.. In The U.K!! #1181605
    galdri
    Participant

    If they pull this off, it will be fantastic. I, however, will remain sceptical until the aircraft has flown.

    If it is true that they hold the design authority on the Shack, it will make things a lot easier paperwork wise. But there is a lot of things besides the paperwork. Where are they going to find the money (not readily seen on their website)? Where are they going to find the people qulified to do the work? Last but not least, where are they going to find hangarage for a big aircraft like that. They will not be doing a respar job out in the open, and even if they get the workforce for free (from where?), just the cost of hangarage will be huge. No mention is made of how they are going to cover that on their website.
    Presumably they will need to a complete overhaul of all four engines and props to airworthy status. That is going to cost huge amounts of money, where is that money coming from???

    Like I said before, I would really like to see them pull this one off. My memories of the Growler are fantastic. Growler doing a lowpass over Reykjavik Airport with me standing maybe 50 meters from the runway edge. Those Griffons really made my internal bodyparts shake!!!:D

    in reply to: E170 – Nose wheel lost after takeoff #489640
    galdri
    Participant

    Good to see that this happens with more aircraft types than the ATR42:eek: Lost a left nosewheel once. Not nice, could have ended in disaster. We were just plane lucky:eek:

    in reply to: Photo's of an RAF career 1930's to 1960's ! #1183229
    galdri
    Participant

    Until we get a high res scan, I would be tempted to say they are Spitfire Mk.XIX´s. They were there at the time.

Viewing 15 posts - 316 through 330 (of 1,150 total)