Here are a couple of more pictures. The quality of the Buddy Great Lakes is not very good, because the guy insisted on formating upsun, well you can’t have everything!
Yes, TF-BAY is a Buddy Great Lakes. It is supposed to be a two seat version of the Baby Lakes, but the two people in there need to be……well, intermate! I don’t think this one has ever flown two-up, only flown solo. And it is a great little performer with the O-200.
Just to give you some idea of the size of this bird, the top wing would be about shoulder hight!
Is the Bucc in the last picture missing some very important parts of it’s body, or is it just superb piece of camo? 😉 😀 😀
Provided the crab is co-ordinated, it has no effect on the ASI. It would only be in a slip/skid situation that the ASI is affected, and then it would either under read or over read depending on the position of the pitot with regards to the direction of slip/skid.
This is a really tricky quiz. Provided the approach is flown in a co-ordinated crab down to the fare, at the correct airspeed, I see no reason what-so-ever for the alarmingly steep angle.
What I could imagine on the other hand is an unstable approach. If we are talking Maule with the 235 horse engine, I could imagine the following senario. You arrive on finals high with landing flaps. On seeing that the approach is on the high side you chop the power, and the prop goes to fine pitch creating a huge braking effect. To keep the airspeed you would lower the nose, and the approach becomes very steep indeed. When you arrive close to the ground, you are back on slope and the nose comes up, without the increase in power needed to maintain airspeed, and the airspeed starts to bleed off. What is then needed to salvage the situation is a big blast of power and the resaulting landing will be less than perfect.
That’s right dcollins, it is a truly wonderful restoration. That bird will surely look like new when finished.
There is no work being carried out on this aircraft (or any other for that matter) at the time being, as the landlord Martin Baker has terminated the lease agrement for the facilities. The muesum has to vacate the buildings by October, but the problem is, they have nowhere to go. So they are in a really tough position.
Damn………………..
Found out much too quickly 😉 😀 😀
Ok. Now I understand it 😉
I was a bit scared there for a moment. Thinking you knew the thing too well to fly it comfortably 😉 😀
I’m new to this thread………so bear with me for a moment.
Do I understand it correctly? Melv has not actually flown that contraption of his? 😮 Certainly makes you wonder doesn’t it? 😉 😀 😀
I pay about 65 p per liter of avgas here in Reykjavik (BIRK).
Hummm………Nice try, but no! 😮
The insurance coverage being talked about here is THIRD party coverage. To cover damages to people or property not in the aircraft at the time. For example if (god forbids) on of them machines was to crash on a house, the third party liability coverage is there to pay for the damage to the house and it’s inhabitants
A shame. 😡
Brussels eurocrats are just about succeding where the Luftwaffe failed, to shoot down the last B-17’s in Europe 😡
That is surely a nice bird! Wish I was loaded with unwanted cash 😉 😀
I hate to say this Phantom, as I know the P40 is your favourit aircraft, but I hardly think the words ‘superb’ and P40 should be in the same sentence. True, it had one of the best roll-rates of any WW2 fighter, but that’s about it. Other than that, it was a flying truck. Not very fast and not very manuverable (other than it’s super roll rate). High level or down in the bushes does not really matter.
What the P40 had that made it useable for so long was the fact, that it had 6 .50 brownings in the wings and it could carry a bomb. Therefor it was usable in the ground attack role, not as a pure fighter
So basically what we have here, is a BIG problem. Since no-one is holding the type certificate, the CAA can do pretty much as the like. And since they like to play it on the ‘save’ side, it will mean some serious AD 😮
Maybe I better re-engine that Gemini with a couple of Walters and keep it experimental 😮
I’m not sure what type it is, but it does appear to have the ‘trade mark’ Morane-Saulnier design of the fin/rudder. So at first glance I thought about the M.S 43, but on closer inspection the aircraft in the photo has a radial, while all the literature states the Hispano-Suiza as the M.S. 43’s powerplant.