Ok, so it is a Kaman K.16B. I have to admitt I have not got a clue what that is.
Judging by the very short wingspan and somewhat oversized engines, I would guess it is an idea, or proof of concept, of a skimmer. A skimmer is a ‘kind of’ aircraft, design to carry great loads at high speed, flying in ground effect over sea.
Hi Moggy,
No, I don’t think there is anything you need to know about how to fly your Colt, at least not from me 😉 😀
This reference to the PA 22 was a bit of a mistake on my part, as I did not remember the Colt 😮 The PA 22 I was referring to was the PA 22-150/160 Tri Pacer, on which I have some time. In the AFM for that model it is clearly stated that intentional spinning is Stricktly Prohibited, and it is placarded on the instrument panel as well. I remember reading a couple of reports on Tri Pacers lost in unrecoverable spin to the ground. I suspect that aft C/G played a big part in some or all of them, so it may not be entierly the aircraft’s fault.
So, happy spinning in your Colt 😀 Just remember not to let it turn more than twice in the spin!
Well first of all, stall, as such, is very seldom dangerous in it self. 😎
If we assume that you were doing the barrel roll more or less correct (that is, had positive g) when you stalled, it does not matter which side of the aircraft is pointing upwards. If you have positive g, it is just a normal stall, of the variety seen in straight and level flight. To affect a recovery, ease the stick forward to decrease angle of attack and increase engine power to increase speed.
In case the barrel roll was less than perfect :rolleyes: and you had negative g when the aircraft stalled, you would have had………a negative g stall, or the kind of stall you would expect from the aircraft when flying up side down. To affect a revovery, pull the stick torwards you to decrease angle of attack and increase engine power to increase speed.
Most important thing to remember about stalls, is the fact that it does not matter which side of the aircraft is up or down. If you have a positive g, it is a normal upright stall (even though the aircraft might be inverted) and if you have a negative g it is a normal inverted stall (even though the aircraft might be upright). Sound complicated, but once you start flying aerobatics it all falls into place 😉
Now to your question. To say that only two aircraft (types) are able to recover from a stall in the situation you descripe (wether it be positive or negative stall) is absolutly absurd! All aircraft can recover from a positive stall and all aircraft can recover from a negative stall. The only tricky part is, some aircraft (i.e. transport category) would not neccesarily be able to recover from inverted flight (if the stall happened in such conditions). But if you are talking light aircraft, ALL of them would be able to recover from either stall.
If you are taking the stall to it’s next level, the spin, the waters are muddied somewhat, as some light aircraft are not save to spin upright (the Piper PA 22 for example) but most of them are ok. None of the standard light aircraft have been spin tested inverted, so recovery from that situation is unknown. However as you were talking about a Chippie, I think it would be fairly save to say that it can be recovered from both upright and inverted spins as it is fully aerobatic. Most aerobatic aircraft don’t care which side is up when they are spinning.
I’m trying to register my latest toy here in Iceland, and the Icelandic CAA is having some problems with the paperwork 🙁 Stange thing is though, I’ve been in contact with the UK CAA, and they would be quite pleased with the paperwork I have for the aircraft 😮 And you think your CAA is all bad??
As this company is the last registered owner of said toy, it more or less holds the key to solve the problem.
Just fantastic:D
With regards to weight limits for SEP rating on a JAR licence, I think I’m correct in saying (at least that’s how it works in Iceland) that there is no upper limit for the weight. As long as it is single engine piston, it can be 100 000 kg and a holder of JAR PPL could still fly it.
There are however other items that need careful consideration. If the aircraft has retractable undercarrige and/or constant speed prop, a differencial training is needed, and has to be signed of be a flight instructor in the logbook. The same applies if the aircraft in question is a taildragger.
Another thing that needs to be checked is whether the aircraft in question is on the JAR ‘Black List’ Some SEP types need a type rating according to the JAR, mainly because of their less than perfect safety record. One such machine that springs to mind, is the Piper Malibu. JAR PPL holder can not fly that machine unless having a Type Rating. A list of SEP types that need a Type Rating is to be found in (I think) the AMC chapter of the JAR.
Have to admitt, I have no clue about the UK NPPL rules on weight.:(
Ahh, thanks Ant.
Maybe I’ll try and have a look there next time I’m here.
Fantastic!:D
Can we have any more, PLEASE
Hummmmmm………….
JDK, I suppose they do make lovely music when pressed all at once:D
Ohhh…………………. You lucky ^=$%%$$”&/&”/&;) 😀 How was your flight in the Fighter?;)
But what are all those buttons for on the stick of a biplane? You have any idea?
RIP
Watched the accident on Sky, almost live, and I’ll never forget that terrible feeling. Watching two men, volunteering to fly an historic service aircraft, meet their maker was truly horrible.
Remember them.
Well, if we take the Sherloch Holmes approach….
It is in New Zealand and it is probably russian. The clock and the primer are looking russian, besides I think I can see some russian letters on the primer.
The La 9 is out of the game. What else have we got there that is russian? We have a Rata and a biplane, which name excapes me at the moment.:( it is -15 Ch…. something.
The really interesting thing is the stick. I can not see a russian wartime something having all these buttons on the stick.
Please tell me if I’m barking up the wrong tree:D
Hummmm…….
I thought this was going to be a walk in the park, but how wrong!:D
Is it going to be done the correct way, that is, very crudely with brushes and without masking tape as per orginal, or like all D-Day painted machine today, looking too nice with masked off stripes that are sprayed on?;) 😀 😀
I would say………..
The La 9. The clock looks familiary russian;) 😀