dark light

galdri

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 1,150 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: looking for RAF DC-2 pictures and others #2097513
    galdri
    Participant

    I can’t be sure, but somewhere at the back of my mind, I seem to remember a picture of an RAF DC2 in FlyPast maybe two years ago. It was in an article writen, if I remember correctly, by a navigator that finished his training in Canada and navigated a Lockheed Loadstar via the South Atlantic to Africa. I have been trying to find the issue in question, but so far come up with nothing. Does anyone else remember this picture?

    in reply to: Moggy's 'Most Iconic Aircraft' list #2099674
    galdri
    Participant

    Here is my list of the 10 most significant:

    1. The Wright flyer
    2. BlΓ©riot XI- first to cross the channel
    3. Fokker E1 Eindecker – The first practical fighter
    4. Caparoni Ca 1 – The first practical ‘heavy’ bomber
    5. Bristol F.2 fighter – The first practical fighter-bomber
    6. Douglas DC2/3 – First practical commercial aircraft (pax)
    7. Bristol Beaufighter – First effective night fighter
    8. Bell X1 – First through the sound barrier (Miles M52 running close second, it had everything needed, but did not fly!)

    9. Boeing 737 – transportation to the masses
    10. Concorde – First (and only) supersonic transport

    in reply to: Need a PBY / Catalina picture #2099828
    galdri
    Participant

    Hi moggy,

    Is this one any good?
    Photo copyright: Baldur Sveinsson http://www.verslo.is/baldur

    in reply to: Was J3 strong enough #398912
    galdri
    Participant

    Well, yes it was, apparently. I did fly the J3 for approx. 250 hours (not as a glider tug though) and it is a remarkable aircraft. Mine was a little bit modified in that, it had the nose fuel tank replaced with wing tanks. Two up and with full fuel it was……..well how do I put this?……..Heavy! But it always flew just beautifully.

    Back to the original question. I’ve seen an old 8mm film showing a J3 Cub towing a two seat Ka8 into the air. I’ve also seen a still picture of a J3 cub towing two gliders at an airshow in Reykjavik in 1946. One of them looks like a Pratt-Reed two seater and the other looks very much like Graunau Baby, but it is hard to tell exactly as the picture is small/far away (don’t know what it is called in professional terms:D ) So, yes the Cub can do it! On the other hand the climate here in Iceland tends to be rather cold and the density altitude very low, how a Cub would do in 30Β° Centigrate and at an altitude of 3000feet, I donΒ΄t know!

    Hope this helps.

    in reply to: Everyone needs… #2102744
    galdri
    Participant

    Neilly,

    You lucky ba**ard!! Mrs. Galdri would kill me if our livingroom looked like that:D πŸ˜€

    But I have to say, she is not all bad. She allows me generous time at the airport:D πŸ˜€ And now she has even started ASKING to be taken on a hop around the airport:D

    in reply to: Percival Aircraft (Zombie thread from 2003) #2107119
    galdri
    Participant

    Here is a picture of TF TUK at Reykjavik Airport

    in reply to: Percival Aircraft (Zombie thread from 2003) #2107124
    galdri
    Participant

    FL200,

    What I put in the other post was just a short hand version of the history of K242.

    The Civilian history of the aircraft, according to the records I have, is as follows. It was first registered as G-AHVH, then it is registered OO-CCZ. Imported to Iceland in late 1946 and registered TF-TUK. With change of ownership in 1947, the registration changes to TF-VIB. Aircraft retired in 1949 due to inproper building practices, what ever that means! But that is how it is logged in the ICAA records:rolleyes:

    With regards to wether it is a Mk.I or Mk.II, the ICAA has it down as a Mk.I. But all dataplates on the remains state it as being a Mk.II. In this case I’m more inclined to trust the dataplates.

    Regards,
    Galdri

    in reply to: Percival Aircraft (Zombie thread from 2003) #2109192
    galdri
    Participant

    Coanda,
    What kind of drawings do you need? Construction drawings from the factory, or would general overview drawings (without measurements) ala the Maintainance Manual do??

    in reply to: Abandoned Beech? in USA ghost town… #2109194
    galdri
    Participant

    Beech D or E-18. I don’t think it is worth saving this one for the time being. You can get a more complete project (read almost flyable) for around $30.000 – 40.000

    However, if you take it and keep it in a locked cave for, say, 100 years it will be worth A LOT of money:D πŸ˜€

    in reply to: Percival Aircraft (Zombie thread from 2003) #2109234
    galdri
    Participant

    Hi guys,

    I need to clean up my act regarding the Proctors in Iceland. Went to the airport today Proctor hunting, and here is what I found!

    There are actually almost two here! Ae 57 ex G-AHGS exists only in data-plate form on a part of a (fuselage?) frame! There are however battered remains of another Proctor, consisting of a wing, most of the tailgroup and assorted smaller items, in the Icelandic Historical Aviation Society’s hangar at Reykjavik airport. This has been identified as a Mk.II, C/N K242, ex-P6183, exG-AHVH, TF-VIB. The general condition of the parts can only be descriped as ‘poor’, but repairable. Members of the IHAS have plans to restore the remains to airworthy condition but are still waiting to get the last batch of drawings before commencing on the huge task of building the aircraft.

    Unfortunately I didnΒ΄t have camera with me today, so, sorry no photos for now:( Will try to get some though!

    in reply to: Percival Aircraft (Zombie thread from 2003) #2109632
    galdri
    Participant

    Just to get away from the Provost theme for a moment.

    The Icelandic Historical Aviation Society has the remains of a Percival Mk.V Proctor exG-AHS? TF-HGS. The ICAA has the serial number as AE 57, but I find it a little bit strange as a serial so would not count on it!! The ICAA files have been proven wrong before, so it would not be a surprise.

    According to ICAA files it is reported as built in 1946 and is imported to Iceland in 1954.

    in reply to: Best warbird #2109649
    galdri
    Participant

    Probably because ‘someone’ is sitting in the backseat:D πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Best warbird #2109702
    galdri
    Participant

    Now……………….what kind of a washing machine is this??

    in reply to: Best warbird #2109719
    galdri
    Participant

    Exactly:D
    Now you can rant on about Mustangs in general and one in particular for the next two days:D πŸ˜€ πŸ˜€ πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Best warbird #2109754
    galdri
    Participant

    YAK 11 Fan,
    Who treated you this way?:D πŸ˜€

    Maybe if you posted a picture of a Spitfire once-in-a-while, you would be back ‘in’ with the Spit crowd:D πŸ˜€ πŸ˜‰

Viewing 15 posts - 1,021 through 1,035 (of 1,150 total)