dark light

avrorj

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Aircraft at Glastonbury ? #1260352
    avrorj
    Participant

    To me these look more like something from the BAe146/ Avro RJ family, perhaps relics from the cancelled RJX project a few years back? Just my best guess.

    Definatly BAe146/ Avro RJ family, almost certainly an uncompleted airframe from the RJX project.

    in reply to: Avro RJX and Sabena #582799
    avrorj
    Participant

    What were the main differences between the RJX and the older Bae 146 series ? Souped up engines/avionics ???

    Pretty much just that. Nothing to radical.

    As David said if they carried on with the original planned RJX with 2 engines it would probably have sold alot better than the 4 engine version, as most airlines were put off by the fact the RJX had 4 engines.

    in reply to: Avro RJX and Sabena #582829
    avrorj
    Participant

    I am doing a personal study on the abandonment of the Avro RJX project.

    I once read or heard that the bankruptcy of Sabena was instrumental in the Avro RJX being cancelled.

    Does anyone have any views or has anyone else read this? I cannot remember where I read it:(

    I was working on the RJX programme when they cancelled it. I dont remember any mention of Sabena having anything to do with the cancellation.

    In my opinion BAE cancelled it due to the company focusing on military projects and wanting to get out of the loss making (for BAE) regional aircraft market. And they just used 9/11 as an excuse to do this.

    Both Druk Air and British European (now FlyBE) both initially wanted to have there aircraft delivered, but eventually there orders were cancelled.

    If you want any more info on the RJX just let me know and I will see what I can do.

    http://www.smiliner.com/news/pics/2001/bae_britisheuropean_rjx100.jpg

    in reply to: F-35 first flight #2546930
    avrorj
    Participant

    Thanks for the Heads up 😀

    Please let us know when it lands

    1st flight is due to last 1 hour, however I wont be able to keep up the updates, as I have to go out on the works doo in about 15 mins 😎

    in reply to: F-35 first flight #2546942
    avrorj
    Participant

    Airbourne at 12:44 local time

    in reply to: F-35 first flight #2546946
    avrorj
    Participant

    Chase aircraft airbourne.

    AA1 sat on runway ready to go.

    in reply to: F-35 first flight #2546961
    avrorj
    Participant

    You’re part of the industry team, right? Or are you watching a feed everyone else can see too?

    I work on JSF, so not a public feed im afraid.

    Latest info is the fog has lifted and estimated time for 1st flight is now between 12:30 and 12:45 CST (18:30 – 18:45 UK Time)

    in reply to: F-35 first flight #2546987
    avrorj
    Participant

    have been a bit busy over the last few days but will surely post the first flight video once i receive a copy , meanwhile if there is any media or a JSF program participant (or knows someone 😉 ) it can viewed at the team website after a subscription , Here is a pic and a high speed taxi video , will post more once I get back home –

    http://rapidshare.com/files/7596159/F35_Taxi_Hilites_PPT.WMV.html

    http://img186.imageshack.us/img186/1016/2653953br3.jpg

    Currently watching the livestream and the 1st flight is delayed an hour or so due to fog at FW.

    in reply to: Pics of the Typhoon nose gear up landing. #2596342
    avrorj
    Participant

    Why is the refuelling probe still extended???
    Hydraulics, maybe thats why then the nose gear was also up?! :confused:

    I have heard that the refueling probe was out to inhibit an auto-go round, which the autopilot would of initiated due to the nose gear not being down.

    in reply to: Most interesting aircraft you've been on? #574834
    avrorj
    Participant

    Interesting…did you goto Bhutan? 🙂

    No, i went on it when it came back to Woodford for some heavy maintenance. Would love fly into to Paro though!

    in reply to: Most interesting aircraft you've been on? #576267
    avrorj
    Participant

    I have been on a few interesting aircraft at work.

    http://images.airliners.net/photos/middle/0/4/8/449840.jpg
    Druk Air 146-100

    http://images.airliners.net/photos/middle/9/9/8/592899.jpg
    All 3 (at the moment) Nimrod MRA4’s

    http://images.airliners.net/photos/middle/8/0/5/225508.jpg
    All the RJX’s that flew (3off) plus a few that didn’t 🙁

    http://aeroflt.users.netlink.co.uk/waf/aa-mideast/bahrain/pics/AirlinersNetPhotoID596455.jpg
    Bahrain Defence Force RJ85

    Also been on the Queens flight 146’s

    But the rarest aircraft I have actual flew on is probably when I flew LHR – MAN on Concorde (G-BOAB)

    http://images.airliners.net/photos/middle/6/5/9/736956.jpg

    Sadly now longer flying 🙁

    in reply to: Jobs in the Aviation Industry #605127
    avrorj
    Participant

    1. I currently work for BAE Systems at Samlesbury working on the JSF program. Before that i was at Woodford on the shopfloor (Im now in planning) working on the Nimrods and previously the ARA and RJ/RJX aircraft.

    2. I went into an apprenticeship straight from school, so it was pretty decent GCSE results that i needed, plus also several tests at BAe.

    in reply to: Prestwick relics + J41 cockpit location req #1391965
    avrorj
    Participant

    According to W&R16 Jetstream 41 G-PJRT was scrapped 3/11/97, with the nose going to the BAe Flying College to be turned into a simulator and the rest to Shewalton Car Breakers in Irvine (which handled much of the Jetstream cull, apparently). The nose disappeared almost immediately, though.
    Jetstream 31 N414MX was cut up and 28/6/97 and removed to Irvine.
    Jetstream 32 G-31-984 (c/n 984) and the fuselages of c/ns 986 and 987 (see a pattern?) were scrapped 8/97 and removed 2/9/97 – destination unknown.
    Jetstream 41 fuselages c/ns 41105 and 41106 were scrapped 1/9/97, no destination given.
    Jetstream 41 G-OXLI was dismantled 26/6/97 and removed to Bournemouth for trial installtion use before being scrapped in 1999.
    The various static rigs also disappeared, the last being seen in 1998.

    Info extracted from Wrecks and Relics #16 and 17.

    Flood

    The two J41 fuselages you mentioned both went to Woodford, cn41106 (in two halves) went in to the Training School and cn41105 (complete fuse) was stored in the MU Stores at the Poynton end of the airfield. Both were removed in 2002/3 to destination unknown.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)