at the end of the day i think ,how good or bad your kit is or how meny you have got do not matter…as most if not all wars in the past have proved, the biggest weopan is morale and detemination.
thankfully we will never know for sure, who would win or lose. if the WP invaded the west, NATO would be fighting for there homelands and a battle of Britain senario would have set in, and we all know the outcome of that. if NATO invaded WP then the same. whatever side started to think they was losing then nuclear weopons would have been used…then it would have been goodbye sweet mary…..in other words i do not think we would be here today posting on this forum if it happend….. 🙂
i have to be honest with you the good old an-2 never entered my mind when i posted….so the question is what was the last operational biplane apart from the colt….sorry about that…i was thinking about the poor west ham fans they must be feeling like **** at the moment. like i was this time last season….they where robbed……
i cannot belive that…the USAF with no starlifters. they have always been my favorite US transporter…will eny be offered to cival operators i wonder… 🙁
with no more sea harriers with the royal navy and no more tomcats with the US navy… this worlds got a lot more boring.. what makes me mad is that both types have been replaced with less capable types…
i think there is three types of things the RAF [in the last 30 years], seems to like to name there combat aircraft after. as we said birds of prey, storms and big cats… [harrier, hawk, tornado, typhoon, jaguar, lynx, merlin, puma, lightning]… the RAF seemed to stop naming combat aircraft [bombers] after citys with the Lincoln and the Canberra, city names being relegated of sorts to transport types. so i dont think the TSR-2 would have been named after a city, my vote would go for EAGLE, TORNADO !!, LEOPARD… 🙂
thanks for the GOOD news…..i can sleep tonight now… 🙂
the good old mig-28.. you have got to admit the soviets done a fantastic job on copying the F-5E tiger…they must have used them as night fighters being black i mean. what was the kifirs [sorry migs] called in iron eagle, mig-26s or something…lol… 😀
the BAC/BAe EAGLE FB mk 1…..that sounds good…or would it have been GR-1..or just B-1. they would be getting a bit long in the tooth by now. i wonder what there replacments would have been. 😉
comon people we are talking about TV…..the same place we watched tom cruise shooting down black F-5Es [sorry i mean mig-33s] in his tomcat, not so long ago. :rolleyes:
i think its a great pity there is only 2 halifaxs left intact today out of over 6,000 produced. you would think there would be at least one airworthy. not much thought to a great aircraft and the brave people who operated them. its a good job some people still care and remember…..
i have never seen a picture of a nimrod dropping or launching weapons…..
why did the RAF equip there nimrods with harpoons was the sea eagle to large to fit in the bomb bay ????.
the soviet ekranoplans look amazing..like something out of a sc-fi comic..
i have found some stats on the KM, kaspian monster..
span..131ft
lenth..348ft
power….10, VD-7 turbojets
max weight….1.190,500 lb [540 tons]
max cruise….311mph
range…1,864 miles
WHAT A MONSTER…..according to my source 8 was completed, the first in 1965. two have been lost one in 1969 and another in 1980, both pilot error. i wonder where are the other six….
two types of ekranoplans did make it into service…the LUN spasatel, and the A-90 orlyonok [eaglet] . 30 a-90s was delivered to the CIS navy… are these types still in service…
“may the force be with you”
“may the force be with you”
that is a good question…i have often thought the same thing….
at the time the RAF liked to name there aircraft after birds of prey..kestral, harrier, hawk…you never no the TSR-2 may have been named after one…buzzard, eagle, merlin, goshawk….but i suppose we will never know.