dark light

sea vixen

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 676 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What-If: NATO-WP Air War in Central Europe in 1987 #2569728
    sea vixen
    Participant

    at the end of the day i think ,how good or bad your kit is or how meny you have got do not matter…as most if not all wars in the past have proved, the biggest weopan is morale and detemination.
    thankfully we will never know for sure, who would win or lose. if the WP invaded the west, NATO would be fighting for there homelands and a battle of Britain senario would have set in, and we all know the outcome of that. if NATO invaded WP then the same. whatever side started to think they was losing then nuclear weopons would have been used…then it would have been goodbye sweet mary…..in other words i do not think we would be here today posting on this forum if it happend….. 🙂

    in reply to: last of the bi-planes #1287833
    sea vixen
    Participant

    i have to be honest with you the good old an-2 never entered my mind when i posted….so the question is what was the last operational biplane apart from the colt….sorry about that…i was thinking about the poor west ham fans they must be feeling like **** at the moment. like i was this time last season….they where robbed……

    in reply to: Starlifter – end of the line ? #2570155
    sea vixen
    Participant

    i cannot belive that…the USAF with no starlifters. they have always been my favorite US transporter…will eny be offered to cival operators i wonder… 🙁

    in reply to: Tomcat's last cruise #2055080
    sea vixen
    Participant

    with no more sea harriers with the royal navy and no more tomcats with the US navy… this worlds got a lot more boring.. what makes me mad is that both types have been replaced with less capable types…

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1289055
    sea vixen
    Participant

    i think there is three types of things the RAF [in the last 30 years], seems to like to name there combat aircraft after. as we said birds of prey, storms and big cats… [harrier, hawk, tornado, typhoon, jaguar, lynx, merlin, puma, lightning]… the RAF seemed to stop naming combat aircraft [bombers] after citys with the Lincoln and the Canberra, city names being relegated of sorts to transport types. so i dont think the TSR-2 would have been named after a city, my vote would go for EAGLE, TORNADO !!, LEOPARD… 🙂

    in reply to: Problem with the Sea Vixen? #1289187
    sea vixen
    Participant

    thanks for the GOOD news…..i can sleep tonight now… 🙂

    in reply to: Media Ignorance? #2570854
    sea vixen
    Participant

    the good old mig-28.. you have got to admit the soviets done a fantastic job on copying the F-5E tiger…they must have used them as night fighters being black i mean. what was the kifirs [sorry migs] called in iron eagle, mig-26s or something…lol… 😀

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1290711
    sea vixen
    Participant

    the BAC/BAe EAGLE FB mk 1…..that sounds good…or would it have been GR-1..or just B-1. they would be getting a bit long in the tooth by now. i wonder what there replacments would have been. 😉

    in reply to: Media Ignorance? #2570914
    sea vixen
    Participant

    comon people we are talking about TV…..the same place we watched tom cruise shooting down black F-5Es [sorry i mean mig-33s] in his tomcat, not so long ago. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: Some Pictures of the Halifax restoration #1290719
    sea vixen
    Participant

    i think its a great pity there is only 2 halifaxs left intact today out of over 6,000 produced. you would think there would be at least one airworthy. not much thought to a great aircraft and the brave people who operated them. its a good job some people still care and remember…..

    in reply to: IMPRESSIVE WEAPON LOADS THREAD #2570923
    sea vixen
    Participant

    i have never seen a picture of a nimrod dropping or launching weapons…..
    why did the RAF equip there nimrods with harpoons was the sea eagle to large to fit in the bomb bay ????.

    in reply to: Cold war prototypes that didn't make it #2571203
    sea vixen
    Participant

    the soviet ekranoplans look amazing..like something out of a sc-fi comic..
    i have found some stats on the KM, kaspian monster..
    span..131ft
    lenth..348ft
    power….10, VD-7 turbojets
    max weight….1.190,500 lb [540 tons]
    max cruise….311mph
    range…1,864 miles

    WHAT A MONSTER…..according to my source 8 was completed, the first in 1965. two have been lost one in 1969 and another in 1980, both pilot error. i wonder where are the other six….
    two types of ekranoplans did make it into service…the LUN spasatel, and the A-90 orlyonok [eaglet] . 30 a-90s was delivered to the CIS navy… are these types still in service…

    in reply to: General Discussion #320599
    sea vixen
    Participant

    “may the force be with you”

    in reply to: star wars day #1931385
    sea vixen
    Participant

    “may the force be with you”

    in reply to: What's in a name? #1292058
    sea vixen
    Participant

    that is a good question…i have often thought the same thing….
    at the time the RAF liked to name there aircraft after birds of prey..kestral, harrier, hawk…you never no the TSR-2 may have been named after one…buzzard, eagle, merlin, goshawk….but i suppose we will never know.

Viewing 15 posts - 511 through 525 (of 676 total)