Nice pictures

Steven

No wonder why it has a huge mouth filled with a smile. 😉

I agree but airframe hours are important in this case the more hours they have the more time they have but an upgrade would cost

An upgrade wouldn’t cost more hours and airframe hours, in this case they would make the hours cheaper when upgaraded. It’s just like the Super Hornet, the upgrade receiving makes the super hornet have cheaper hours to fly. But if you build another plane and don’t reduce the flying cost then your planes In trouble, you wouldn’t have enough hours to be receiving flight training. So that’s why they try to reduce the cost so the aircraft can be maintainable with cheaper flying hours.

Thats the the whole point. where is the picture of such MIG-29K before 2006?

Here’s the MIG-29K from 2005. It’s the all round black version as you can see theres the different virants of the MIG-29K from the Indian Navy/Russian Airforce hopefully i helped you out with the photos. 😀

k thx. Wanted your confirmation. Any news of recent manoeuvers (those where a Rafale was lost)?

Sorry for the anger, halloweene it’s just that people don’t look closley there. But we’re cool,

Steven

Question to FA18 : legacy hornet?

That’s a legacy Hormet. Look at it closley, you can see its small and it doesn’t have big wings and it’s round things i should call it cheeks.

well from what I understand

1980s = MiG-29M
1980s = MiG-29K based on MiG-29M
1990s = MiG-29M2 two seater based on MiG-29M
2000s = MiG-29KUB based on MiG-29M2
2010s = MiG-35 using MiG-29KUB airframe with different avionics cuz they couldn’t get money or support to build the original MiG-35 plans

Thanks,

Stevem

only joking. It’s good to joke time to time on forums… People are so serious…

😀