dark light

F-18Growler

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 730 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258300
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    I should have just said F/A-18. 😀

    😉

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258304
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    Indeed. On another note, it’s basically fighters have a broad range of A/A capabilities, such as HEA or in the Super Hornet’s case JHMCS. Everything is covered as much as possible.

    Yes correct

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258312
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    An interesting documentary about the US Navy Super Hornet exercising with Luftwaffe Mig-29s. Very interesting!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ackHvuNKQjo

    It ain’t a Super Hornet! It’s a legacy hornet but interesting. 🙂

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258319
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    There’s a reason why Typhoon goes fast during a dogfight, it’s because that’s the best way to fight. Higher speed = better energy. Slower speed = less energy, (depending on power to weight ratio, thrust, aerodynamics, airframe design etc). And it doesn’t always necessarily need reheat to dogfight, for an aircraft that can go supersonic from brakes off in 30 seconds, it pretty much shows that there’s plenty of thrust available – meaning less time can be spent on reheat to save fuel.

    Well like i said, “It depends on the pilot/enemy if they’d want to engage in a Highspeed or Low Speed dogfight”. It doesn’t have to always be a Highspeed dogfight.

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258324
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    No worries. No need to apologize.

    Ok 🙂

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258344
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    There’s nothing in Europe that can match the nose authority of the Super Hornet at slow speeds.

    …Is pretty much what he just said

    Ok thanks, can’t understand that typing. 🙁 Sorry about that

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258385
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    Anyone who hve seen the SH at airshow will hve doubt abt anything in Eu tht hve a better nose authority.

    What?

    Even the Flank looks like slower in term of alpha/s

    It may look slow but in airshows the Flankers entertain the people with their slow speed thing but it ain’t close to Super Hornets maneuverability.

    But true, the transonic perfs are deceptive only for their pilots (I guess it’s an SA improving feature for Boeing PR) 😉

    🙂

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258549
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5097/5471106429_e94a01a7ba_o.jpg

    http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5179/5471118449_8b60d79074_o.jpg

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258641
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    http://farm3.staticflickr.com/2453/3769364649_a6fd04fdfe_o.jpg

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258672
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    Slow speed maneuverability (handling) is okay if you’re lining up to land on a carrier in the middle of the Pacific in rough weather – but isn’t that useful when you’re up against another air superiority fighter at much higher speeds.

    Well i don’t know how to agree on this debate. Super Hornets called a slow speed air superiority plane/dogfighter. It has the best slow speed characteristics for maneuverability in the air superiority arena. I doubt any fighter can go that slow to dogfight like a Super Hornet. Super Hornets challenging plane to fight in the air. But Eurofighter has to go fast to dogfight, meaning it’s afterburners are always on to dogfight the opponent and get the kill. I don’t know how well the Super Hornet can do in a high speed dogfight, meaning don’t know how can it dogfight using afterburners all the time. But in slow speed dogfighting, you’ll have to use afterburners to climb/get energy for the Super Hornet.

    It’s quite bizarre to be going slow to dogfight in todays dogfights but mostly dogfights occur with afterburners on and little bit of maneuvering. But i think you need afterburners on to get the kill fast or try to get away and then shoot.

    Either way, it depends on the pilot/enemy if they’d want to get in a high speed dogfight or go slow.

    But don’t know how WVR engagements will start or don’t know how BVR engagements start.

    in reply to: Eurofighter Typhoon News and Updates #2258730
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    Hmm DragonMaster still doesn’t get it. Big nonsense on what he usually does on every thread. Big blah blah, he is very childish then what i used to be when i first joined the forum. DragonMaster’s consequence is a ban actually.

    DragonMaster, you need to respect people when they tell you information. Don’t think you have everything under controll beacuse you don’t. Your the most anticipated person in the forum with blah blah conservations when people ask you or say something then take action to be rude.

    Please take one step back and listen what the people on the forum say.

    in reply to: AIM-9x vs AIM-120 #1790002
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    Something from 2009 that you might like Mr Growler

    http://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/exclusive-raytheon-adapts-aim-9x-for-air-to-ground-missson-335762/

    “Raytheon has adapted the heat-seeking AIM-9X to strike moving targets on the ground or in the water, adding another new capability for the formerly air-to-air-only missile.

    The modification allows the same AIM-9X to strike both air and ground targets.”

    Interesting link David, i wouldn’t like to adopt the AIM-9x into a Multirole missile. It’s beacuse you’d need to require a lot of capabilities to add on a Multirole AIM-9x, which will fairly take some buiesness to go on to. I’d rather use the AIM-9x as our ultimate advanced tactical missile in Air-to-Air combat. But the Sidewinder family won’t be with us forever.

    in reply to: Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics. #2258903
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    maybe growler may not want to hear this but I agree on its kitematic performance lacks, range, speed. where’s the part you don’t agree on? although its not going to lack anymore beacuse it’s now going to block iii with fixed purposes.

    I understand the pros and cons on the Super Hornet. Well I guess it’s speed and range that Super Hornet mostly lacks on. Well your right, but the Block II made new improvements. Now it’s Block III that’s making huge improvements, it’s testing out the aerodynamic quality on the Super Hornet and testing the allround upgrades it has to have tested on August/ September. As a result these things that Super Hornet lacks may improve its qualities on Block III so we’ll see on the month of August/September.

    By all that aside, yes correct indeed the Super Hornet can excel and be effective in air superiority with its superior A2A capabilities that you’ve mentioned on the previous page.

    the navy might require the meteor for the lost AIM-54 capability. i never said its receiving meteor.

    Correct

    F-18Growler
    Participant

    5th Gen planes cost way too much. It has costly flying hours, needs long maitnance hours.

    The F-22 is banned to be exported to other country’s and 5th Gen aircraft are new so it takes a while to be tested, that said mostly the 4.5 Gen era of fighters are mostly the cheapest and reliable aircraft of today. Low cost, low maitnance hours, and low cost for flying hours.

    It’s pretty much the 4.5 Gen fighters that are getting exported to other country’s. For the matter the next Gen of fighters might be cheaper or costly when 2060 comes. I guess there won’t be any aircraft in that era anymore. The F-35 is going to take on that year. Then when the F-35 is retired from the main services, we will start moving on the saga of UAV aircraft era. Probably which drones will be the most cheapest to operate.

    in reply to: AIM-9x vs AIM-120 #1790012
    F-18Growler
    Participant

    [1] Mica cant attack ground targets, there was one project with that aim, the JDRADM, but that was not a french project, it was US.

    It’s a Multirole missile, so it does attack ground targets but it hasn’t been proved yet.

    [2] Matra is the french company that made Mica missile

    Ok thanks for that.

    [3] Yes, Magic exist, both 1 & 2, and they are french, too.

    Is magic a missile?

Viewing 15 posts - 346 through 360 (of 730 total)