:applause:
:applause:
basically a single engined F-4
:confused: ?????
f-11 tiger is quite a looker..but this is better
it lasted USn service far longer than the tiger which was retired rather quickly.
What’s that plane?
topspeed’s dream airplane
Maybe this one? LOL

There new plane. 😀

Should have 40+ kills from the war with Iran (both helicopters and fixed wing… mostly F4s!)… in fact MiG21 scored more kills for Iraq than any other type (including mirage F1, MiG23, MiG25 etc…)… but that’s because they had close airbases to fly out of, and GCI over the battlefield… giving them a distinct advantage over the F4s that flew in from a longer distance.
2-3 kills against Israel (1967 and 1973)
Yea IAF mostly scored those kills from F-4s MOSTLY due to its small size and weight. But why didn’t Russians scored any kills? Well I guess it proves that IAF had a superior fighter during Vietnam. Anyways Russians used the MiG-21 for High Speed Intercepting.
MiG-21 is not designed as a dog fighter. It’s a point defence interceptor designed to blast incoming bombing formations. It just happens to have certain factors that contribute to decent performance.
F-4 dominated over MiG-21 in Israeli-Arab Wars. This included MiG-21s flown by Soviet pilots.
F-16A dominated MiG-21s in Lebanon (even though Syrians claim otherwise but their claims are completely unconfirmed).
Nearly all were WVR combat – early Israeli F-16s were not BVR capable.
Once US got its act together, it’s F-4s were a match for MiG-21. In fact North Vietnamese also got great mileage out of MiG-17.
TVC? We’re approaching realms of fantasy here. What next – F-86 Sabre could be an F-15 killer if fitted with AESA and AMRAAMS?
No-one is lining up to shove up a TVC on a MiG-21.
There’s also things like aerodynamics and structural integrity to take into account. Just cause you have TVC doesn’t mean you’re airframe is set up to do TVC maneouvring.
Best MiG-21 can get is MiG-21 Bison and from memory MiG-21bis isn’t as nimble as some of the earlier models but I could be wrong.
Maybe the Russians would’ve used LERX for the MIG-21? I doubt that they’ll do that they would’ve needed to redesign the airframe all over again. But although its small wing loading they could’ve make the MIG-21 stealthy but as i said they would’ve needed to do the airframe again. The MiG-21 has clearly been produced since 1959 with overall a 11,496 build MiG-21s in Russian history? MiG-21 has had kills.
Iraqi Mig-21 kill record:
1 Iranian F-14 Tomcat
Other Iranian/Kuwait aircrafts?
Good ol F-11 Tiger
![]()
More F/A-18
[ATTACH=CONFIG]216270[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]216271[/ATTACH]
[ATTACH=CONFIG]216272[/ATTACH]
Probably the only aggressors with AESA radar.
Guess so.
😎
😎
Lots of love etc 😉
Cool. 😎
In a turning gun fight a Mig-21 can still turn inside of a F-16.
The main shortcoming of the early ones in ‘Nam was the engine. The later versions with an improved engine do not suffer that problem.
It is still a point defense interceptor but in a gun fight it is at worst even with an F-16.
Mig-21 is a 1950s Dogfighter and I guess it could outmaneuver a old Phantom II and score a kill but a F-16 could completely score a MIG kill if it was dogfighting with a MiG-21 could get shot down easily. But an upgraded Mig-21 with TVC and newer avionics, it would be certainly a big diffrence.