Yes but I prefer Smooth Criminal. To be honest I much prefer the music of the late 50s/60s/70s to alot of what was put out in the 80s.
Hah I see I do like “Bohemian Raphsody” by Queen from the 70s and Elvis Presley- “Suspicious Minds” 70s.
Yes but I prefer Smooth Criminal. To be honest I much prefer the music of the late 50s/60s/70s to alot of what was put out in the 80s.
Hah I see I do like “Bohemian Raphsody” by Queen from the 70s and Elvis Presley- “Suspicious Minds” 70s.
F-18Growler, thread’s meant to be a bit of a laugh about outrageous claims. If you can’t handle a joke, I recommend you don’t read it.
MSphere, whoops I did mean 613X.
Sorry sometimes people get out of their nerves, then they try to say something about you. I already got a comment saying that he wasn’t mentioning me. He was mentioning about Y-20 Beacon. Yeah I can stand jokes sometimes.
Ah, the man in the Comet hangar with the monopod? I claim my prize! 🙂
:confused:
No not you, that used to be “Y-20 Bacon”‘s old nick – “F-18 Hamburger”. All respect for the Growler 😀
[ATTACH=CONFIG]216170[/ATTACH]
Wow……..I guess I’m gonna have to leave this thread cause I’m gonna end up going places that I dont like to go as far as dealing with other posters. All I can say is……take a little time to research the subject matter. cheers.[ATTACH=CONFIG]216166[/ATTACH]
Pssshhhh. 😉
Nobody is saying that, no plane is better than the other per se generally speaking, everything generally has its role and its place. But here is what you are looking for:
“During air combat manoeuvres with the People’s Liberation Army Air Force, for example, PAF JF-17s were pitched against Chinese Su-27s in a number of scenarios and reportedly achieved favourable results.”
http://www.air-defense.net/forum/index.php/topic,5760.msg698913.html#msg698913And thanks Rii, I appreciate your concern for fairness and what’s proper. That gentleman goes about posting personal insults against me all over the forum, has been doing it for a while, he understands what the word privy can be used for, just trying to be a …. (fit your own unsavory word there). Too bad the forum moderators haven’t bothered.
As for Y-20 Bacon / J-20 / J-7 hot dog……. F-18 Hamburger he is a long time forum troll and we all love him that way.
You calling me a troll? How about you call yourself a troll. I’m not saying stupid things I’m saying this thread should be deleted. PLA-Burger I bet we all love your name that way. 😀 😉
When you want the thread to move up again you bump it.
Explaination: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=bump
It is ok to read more than the title when someone gives you an example. In Obligatorys case it was post #7.
Yes I get it now. I bump my posts up. Ok 😎
The Australian government confirms purchase of 12 EA F18 Growlers.
http://www.upi.com/Business_News/Security-Industry/2013/05/03/Australia-to-procure-EA-18-Growlers/UPI-47991367601468/
That’s 36 F18 Super Hornets & 64 more to go.:applause::D
Yeah I heard that they bought E/A-18 Growlers. Way to go Australia!
Here for instance
http://forum.keypublishing.com/showthread.php?97983-AIM-120-range-questions
AIM-120 questions?
I mostly see the word ‘BUMP’ being used for that purpose
Where?
Super David, I like the P-51 picture.
Whoever is flying that Rafale is about 1/2 second from becoming completely defensive. I hope that fleeting shot was worth it 🙂
As for the Swiss charles pics, I have no idea what you guys mean that it has “super hornet FCS”. That is not the case with any legacy hornet anywhere. Not that it would really matter, but for semantics sake, that is completely false. The computing power required for the function of an FCS is minimal……the computers in the legacy Hornet are not lacking in any way. If you are talking about software, that is also not a true statement. We run completely different FCS and MC software than the Super Hornet folks. Either way, in pure performance terms, the Hornet has a distinct advantage over the Rhino in every realm of flight, with any ordnance load. With the exception of fuel performance of course…..
Running the software of a jet that has completely different aerodynamic characteristics would not be a good idea.
:confused:
My dad flew A-7s for some 15 years with the Air Force/ Air Guard so I’m not going to confuse the two. But you simply CANNOT be making the claim that the F-8 was never used to tote bombs against ground targets, can you? Heres a hint…..if the Marines flew it, they were gonna hang bombs on it. [ATTACH=CONFIG]216165[/ATTACH]
O nice picture there well you gave me proof that it did use Bombs. Anyways I’d still get a Crusader over an F-4. 😎 Crusader looks nice with the bombs aren’t those Mark-82 bombs the F-8 is carrying?
Its ok. Im in a forgiving mood. 😉
That’s an ok 😎 I just like to keep track on my threads so that way people won’t forget about my thread and so on the other one. Anyways