🙂

I bought that record without hearing it.My sister told me i would like it so i bought it –and i did 🙂

Classic song 🙂

David Lee Roth- “Might as well JUMP”!

None, since pop music died when the Beatles arrived, and has never been resurrected.

:confused: 🙁

You guys make we laugh. Who says the Super Hornet will out perform the F-35??? Yet, when I provide an experts that have access to both aircraft you disregard it out of hand! I provided a quote from a highly experienced Test Pilot. That has thousand of flight hours in the Hornets, Vipers, Raptors, Typhoons, and now the F-35 Lighting. Of course he and Lockheed Martin must be lying??? Funny, why isn’t Boeing lying??? Plus, can anybody provide a source that has access to the F-35 and claims its performance is lower than advertised???

Those are still critical features. When I saw he’s flown Hornets it made me laugh. He hasn’t flown any Super Hornet, but I’m sure that the F-35 outpreforms the F/A-18A/C/D NOT the Super Hornet. The test pilot I think hasn’t flown any 1,000 hours total on all aircraft that’s totally impossible. LM is trying to persuade Costumers to buy the F-35 because none of countries want any F-35’s. I’m sure LM will continue the lies of the F-35’s performance. LM is only advertising the F-35 and making lies that it’s effective in combat. LM hasn’t been so successful making and building the F-35.

Van Halen- “Jump”

Guys what happened?

?

So it was not designed as a Multi role fighter? Just because it was not an all out AD Optimized design like the F-22 does not mean it was not designed for air combat. It replaces the F-16 and F-18 the mainstays of the USAF and USN Air warfare fleet. If the F-18E/F is not as or more capable in air combat compared to the F-22 , do we say the F-18E/F is not designed for air combat?

There both designed as Multi-Role Fighters. But the F-35 wasn’t designed to dogfight or have A2A role, but instead the F-35 has both a2g and a2a roles but it’s tasks are more air to ground. The F/A-18E/F Super Hornet were designed for Air-to-Air and Air-to-Ground the Super Hornet is more ADVANCED and larger so it can defend and do many roles that no aircraft can do but the Super Hornet’s tasks are A2A, A2G, and Tanker.

The F-35 brings some advantage in WVR arena, the NG helmet for starters, Its ability to stay LO in BVR giving it potential First shots…Its HMD , DAS Integration…Overall EOTS performance , range etc etc…Thats some capability to try to neutralize…No?

It can’t fight in the WVR because the HMD has problems and it might not have the maneuverability to out maneuver Sukhoi’s in WVR. USAF test pilots have noted a lack of visibility from the F-35 cockpit during evaluation flights and said that this will get them shot down in every combat.

I would not generalize like that, but i agree the F-35 would be HARD to detect without proper support. Couple that with the Integrated avionics, MADL, Passive sensors and performance of the Apg-81 (See the video i posted in the F-35 News thread) i’d say compared to a SH the F-35C would always have a FIRST Look and FIRST Shot in BVR…

No response.

So its outstanding avionics are able to pick a VLO 5th gen jet before that 5th gen jets OUTSTANDING avionics which have a whole spectrum of active/passive options does ? The Apg-81 is a fully brand new radar designed by NG, it combines full integration with EOTS, and DAS that is 360 degrees coverage…Couple that with MADL, and a VLO airframe , the detection advantage would ALWAYS rest with the F-35 much like the F-22 vs Legacy BVR engagements..

Don’t have a response here.

The F-35 has HMD, 9x and DAS which will be an excellent system to have for close combat especially when fighting with wingmen .. Again see how DAS, HMD, is supposed to work in combat for the F-35..

Like i said USAF pilots say theres a lack of visibility from the F-35 cockpit.

According to pilots that tested the F-35 @ High AOA’s they claim that it flies better then the legacy jets in that regime…

No response.

Thanks i fixed it.