http://ericpalmer.wordpress.com/2007/12/02/history-they-dont-want-you-to-know/
What a stupid link anyway. The Flanker can outrun the Rhino. Not out turn since its a capable WVR fighter. Really one old post. Should find a recent one. It’s still agile in subsonic speeds, i don’t get why is it not agile in transonic. Very stupid story.
An interesting topic, but these threads always end up going ar$e over knockers…
Haha 😉
Say the F-35 has a geometry distance hook about 7.8 of distance which is lower than most of the Navy aircraft landing on carrier. So if it’s not able to land on carrier is it possible to create the hook longer and stronger? It has a short hook, which is something that the F-35 has trouble dealing aboard ships. Is it still able to land on carrier with the 7.8 distance?
Oh no…
Oh yes 😉
he is talking about me, stop stressing
Ok got it.
What the hell is a J-17?! :confused:
Sorry JF-17 ಠ_à²
Why the Mig-35, what advantages would that bring over the Gripen?
¯(°_o)/¯
It was politics that got the Typhoon selected in Austria
Should’ve gone for the Mig-35 IMHO.
Speaking abt Canada, this a very ill advised comment. Do you remind their rescent helo tender?
Sry for the Canadian reader.
😉
[QUOTE]
Why won’t the Super Hornet survivability not decrease??? Sorry, I doubt even you believe that. Especially, as the PAK-FA (FGFA), J-20, and J-31 come online. Plus, that doesn’t even touch on future Air Defense Systems.
In stealth it will decrease survivability. But in a engagment is not going to be decreasing survivability. I guess WVR will never exist in 2020-2100. But it’s still survivable in a engagment. So your predicting the future heh? You’ll never know if it’s possible to lose its survivability since that’s it’s main mission to survive a threat.
A perfectly shaped External Fuel Tank adds considerable drag. So, how does a CFT or Stealthy Weapons Pod reduce drag??? Your going to have a provide a good source on that one. Like I said earlier the USN just begun test on the CFT’s. So, I don’t believe any published data has been released yet???
Well i think you should go back and read more about the Block III upgrade. Prove it has + drag when these components are put into the Rhino.
As it stands right now we don’t even know if the USN will fund the CFT’s, Stealthy Weapon Pods, and Upgraded F414-EPE’s. My guess is the USN may purchase a number of CFT’s but not the Stealthy Weapon Pods or EPE’s. (my opinion)
Like my point earlier, the US Navy doesn’t care about its poor performance in acceleration and drag. They just want more Range and combat radius to match the F-14’s long range capability. They at least have to upgrade to improve its acceleration and focus on the Rhinos drag. They all care about range. But IMHO, Navy pilots just want their plane to have no more issues on poor acceleration and no issues in drag. They want the Rhino to be a good performer in acceleration and don’t want tons of drag on the Bug.
You mean like:
…Your Favorite Hornet/Super Hornet pics.
…Super Hornet News & Disscusion
…Your favorite Super Hornet Block III Upgrade.
I have 3 threads running. Made 4, but the Super Hornet news and discussuion was locked. But i think that’s what EELightning means by. 🙂
It doesn’t matter how cheap the Super Hornet is, or any other aircraft for that matter. It’s simple, Canada will go for the F-35. They’re not going to invest $X Millions into a programme then select something else, it’d be politically unacceptable.
Ok got it.
Canada aren’t going to go for anything but the F-35. For them, it would politically incorrect not to.
Yea correct about that. Since Canda pressed the reset button, there now bringing up other fighters in the competition. I think either the Super Hornet or F-35 will be Canada’s main fighter. F-35 is costy and F-18 is cheaper.
The physics illiterate you were responding to
Your saying i don’t have any thing proving the physics i make/post?
Move on, he has no formal education in physics
Who exactly do you mean by “He Has No Formal Education In Physics”?