dark light

Supermarine305

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 337 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Taxiing Accident — FG-1D and A6M2 #905208
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    An expensive way to make a toast rack.

    Glad no-one was hurt.

    in reply to: WW1 German Talc bomb ? #909420
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I do appreciate the work you put into this.

    Thank you.

    in reply to: Anyone else at Museums have this problem? #914326
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Don’t, arsenic is highly toxic to most mammal life…………..

    Arsenic (except in trace amounts) is highly toxic to all known life except some extremophile bacteria that can just about tolerate big quantities of it.

    Sometimes, some harm has to be done for the greater good !

    People will care more about fluffy animals that some old planes and it would be bad publicity for the museum -and very probably illegal- if that harm befalls some rare species or someone’s pet cat.

    Chilli sauce won’t work I’m afraid, birds have no taste receptors for chilli! I reckon the raptor option might work. Also, anti pigeon spikes might be worth a go? They’re pretty unsightly but I’m sure I’ve seen them on Vulcans etc in the UK to stop the whitewash effect.

    How would those spikes be securely attached without damaging the airframes?. Also they are unsightly.
    I didn’t know that about birds and chilli, but bitternss seems to be a pretty universal taste to be avoided. A stab in the dark but would a bitter compound mixed with vaseline – which would be more durable to rain – be a good deterant?

    in reply to: Anyone else at Museums have this problem? #915258
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Something like this?

    http://www.bird-x.com/bird-stop-products-41.php?page_id=66 * (btw, have no connection with them at all – its just what a Google search hurled at me)

    Depends on how effective it is and how long the protection lasts – I guess a reapplication after rain would be in order.

    But the theory behind it is sound; you’re not going to nibble on anything that tastes or smells bad.

    in reply to: Eric Brown, R.I.P. #844356
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    A day we all knew would come but never wanted to face.

    A legend passes. But what a life to have lead.

    in reply to: Dornier do17 E/F M/P over England, Nose glazing ID #844761
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    If I am not mistaken if there aren’t the flat sections on the edge on the perspex dome then a Do17 source can be pretty much ruled out as the earlier Es and F’s wouldn’t have been flown over England.

    If there are, its great find.

    However, the dome does to me having another look, seem to be too deep to be Do17 nose glazing.

    in reply to: Dornier Do 17 Two Years On Lecture (12/05/2015) #844763
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I’d like to see it the right way up at least!

    I would third that. Would be great to see the Do17 upright with a recontructed canopy and nose glazing

    But I expect the structural support a badly corroded shoulder winged plane would need to have to be shown the right way up would be much more than upside down in some sort of ‘as found’ diorama.

    Duggy. There is a heck of a lot that should have been preserved. But war hardens attitudes and hindsight is always far too late.

    in reply to: Dornier do17 E/F M/P over England, Nose glazing ID #845058
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Early Dornier D017s such as the E/F/M and P series looked fairly similar and had entirely different front sections to the more familiar Z series.
    And that perspex dome does look to be of similar shape. But that is all I can say on it.

    I think some P series were used on Recon flights over the Uk early in the war too (?).

    [ATTACH=CONFIG]244105[/ATTACH]

    [st]But looking closely there are some straight edges at the bottom where the nose fits into the chin glazing. I can’t see that on the artifact above.[/st]

    Edit: Looks to me like those straight edges weren’t on the E (and presumably F) series.

    Edit: Bah, ninja’d.

    in reply to: Old museum exhibits that probably didn't survive #845123
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    The Japanese museum may be the one described in ‘veteran&Vintage aircraft’ by L.Hunt 1967

    ‘JOKOROZAZA Army Air Base. In the air education hall are exhibited
    Fiat BR20
    Fairchild FC22C-7b
    Kellett K-19 autogyro
    Pou de Ciel
    Maurice Farman 1-15
    Henri Farman
    Farman F-60 Goliath
    Nieuport 18E2
    hanriot HD-14
    Hanriot 15
    Hanriot 19
    Spad 20
    Spad 54
    Salmson 2A2
    Nieuport 39
    Junkers G38
    JU87
    Heinkel 118
    Spartan Executive’

    That is some collection! I have googled and not found anything confirmed on fates. Back in the 60’s traveling to japan was not very common so this must have been from a correspondant and could have been very out of date?

    Strangely enough small numbers of the bomber version of the Junkers G.38 were licence built as the Mitsubishi Ki-20 (Army type 97 heavy bomber).
    One was a museum exhibit up until the end of the war. Probably burnt and scrapped and the pieces bulldozed into a hole.

    in reply to: WW1 German Talc bomb ? #845547
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    First thing, Mr. Smith was hardly the only one to look at this crater. If he is the only fatality then that is coincidence. If others died then that would be more interesting. Was possibility of a gas attacks on the UK such a concern during WWI and I am just wondering if the death of this historian might have played into public fears and linked his demise to this crater unnecessarily.

    Is there a picture of this fragment? And is ‘Talc’ from its current labelling or from markings found on the fragment itself?

    If the former could it be some now obscure term or abbreviation from that time. If its the latter, is it just the fragment of a larger german word (I did really bad at german at school so I can’t help there)?

    in reply to: Old museum exhibits that probably didn't survive #845883
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Japan had is museum aircraft up to WWII. Allied bombing probably (this is an assumption) took its toll, but I did read somewhere that the survivirs were scrapped as part of the post-war disarmament process. Where I read that I can’t remember. Its stuck in my mind but none of my books or even Google seems to have any information on this.

    in reply to: Pampa again. Twin Mustang this time. #849835
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Would that be a Matchbox Porsche or a Hotwheels?

    in reply to: 'World War II- Battlefield Recovery'…UK Channel 5 TV #861714
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    It really doesn’t matter whoes side those soldiers were fighting for their remains deserved better treatment. Those old battlefields deserved more than the damage done for such little gain in knowledge. And those that do responsibly excavate recent military sites, recover and protect artifacts and help repatriate the missing dead deserve more than to have their reputations tarnished by that lot.

    in reply to: 'World War II- Battlefield Recovery'…UK Channel 5 TV #861732
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Nazi atrocities! What were those then? :stupid:

    I would hardly think if the program makers had chosen to dig up the site of a battlefield in the same manner that involved British soldiers, with the same regard to any human remains found, I doubt you would be playing Devil’s advocate.

    I also highly doubt that Channel 5 would show it.

    in reply to: 'World War II- Battlefield Recovery'…UK Channel 5 TV #861872
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Blimey I hope too many people don’t complain or we will be back to watching ‘Take me out’. Rightly or wrongly I’m just grateful for a history fix.

    I bet all the complainers watch episode 3 if shown though!!

    Have you two got anything to say in defense of Battlefield Recovery or are you just going to make disparaging remarks on those who disagree with you?

    For my part I saw part of the first one. Couldn’t really take any more of that and switched off befiore the end. Turns out it was just a bunch of amatuers kicking about a woodland looking for Nazi trinkets to gloat over.

    Time Time team has done WWII archaeology with respect and made engaging television that told the history of that particular site and gave an insight on those that fought and died there. It can be done. However I shouldn’t be too surprised that Channel 5 has chosen to scrape the bottom of a barrel instead.

Viewing 15 posts - 151 through 165 (of 337 total)