dark light

Supermarine305

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 337 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: And the Banned didn't play on? #940833
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    This is sad an quite possibly very damaging to a very good and informative thread. I for one like the community here even as a lurker.

    I sympathize with the mods here that have been put in a very difficult position by events outside of their control.

    What happened to those proposals to improve the UK’s libel laws, Mr Cameron?

    in reply to: Museum storage #962368
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    The RAFM have accepted the collection despite the fact that Cosford can no longer find the room for the real Sea Balliol they already have.

    Hmmm. With the ‘sea’ bit in its name and the all the other deck-landing paraphernalia, perhaps the FAAM could find a home.

    And I know I am not the first to point that out here.

    in reply to: Burmese Spitfires (again) #1004488
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Palestine surely as Israel didn’t exist until 1948.

    in reply to: Nimrod MRA4 Survivor (well sort of…) #1008562
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Definitely not this nose section at Cranfield then.

    That was my initial thought anyway.

    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Can someone explain to this pommy please why do those unwanted airframes had to be buried whereas in the Uk they are just merely scrapped and sent to the smelter, surely that is a far better way to make sure they never appear in the air again? or as with the rumours of buried spitfires in Australia the Australian goverment is ensuring a new rumour will abound in the year 3012 😀

    Also why the condition that any display airframes must be behind glass?

    Jay

    Asbestos is the reason I’ve heard.

    in reply to: Aviation Myths #1016679
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Off topic..
    Does someone have a close-up of the Turbinlite’s nose?
    In most the photos I’ve seen it looks like the light is not under a fairing.

    Was it covered?

    Does this answer your question?

    Edit: And this!

    in reply to: Aviation Myths #1016689
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    How does it cause you to crash?

    I can only assume that the trainee pilot thought that the great stonkin’ searchlight grafted onto the Havoc’s nose was actually a normal one you usually find on the ground and got disorientated.

    I might well be wrong there. It does happen.

    in reply to: Aviation Myths #1016704
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    One ‘Turbinlite Havoc’ for your edification.
    http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/96/IWM-MH5710-Havoc.jpg
    (Image is in the public domain)

    in reply to: Aviation Myths #1021188
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    [insert type here] was the best fighter of WWII

    in reply to: Aviation Myths #1033471
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    [insert type here] was the best fighter of WWII

    in reply to: XV244 APU removal #1073993
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    That is not to my mind what preservation is about. Now they have a less complete Nimrod.

    in reply to: A/c leaving Duxford – where? #1081745
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    I cant understand the Poles wanting a Ju52 or similar. Replicas of their own WW2 types would be logical – I would love to see an airworthy Karas for example.

    Might have something to do with the Ju52 being the Luftwaffe’s transport of choice when Germany breezed through Poland in ’39 and occupied them for a bit. You could argue that type -even represented by a post-war licence built variation- has more relevance to Poland than it does to the UK. (No, not getting into a debate on that one :D)

    It would be nice to see some replicas of Poland’s indigenous pre-war designs, as so very little is left. We just need that rare combination of will, skill and money.

    in reply to: TIGHAR Defeated? #947948
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    So, after this lastest outing to collect obscure, vague and inconclusive trinkets that might possibly once have something to do with Earhart does this mean TIGHAR will actually be doing something about recovering that P-38 submerged in a north Wales beach?

    in reply to: Stirling N3638 #949124
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    This goes to prove I don’t know nothin’.

    I have to admit I did look look for any differernce in tone between the outer ring of the roundel and the undersides adjoining . I am sure I could see a very slight difference but perhaps I was staring too hard.

    in reply to: Stirling N3638 #950735
    Supermarine305
    Participant

    Glad to help. But please don’t mistake me for an expert or anything.

    However I never have heard of operational front-line aircraft being a lick of yellow paint for crew training. Someone here should know if that is true or not.

Viewing 15 posts - 301 through 315 (of 337 total)