dark light

Bruggen 130

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 2,114 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: RB211 Ground run, possibly historic? #996901
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    jet

    I really don’t know, I haven’t been and inspected it. EDIT: I wouldn’t know then either. I was simply pointing out that the person who posted that clip on YouTube assumed that it was a bird strike, which it wasn’t. There seem to be plenty of people making assumptions about that engine run, I’m not, I wasn’t there.

    Pete

    I haven’t inspected it either but common sense tells me that there is no strength in in that frame for sideways movement in the event of failure by a blade or couple of wood pigeons:D and I dont think the cemented struts at the back of the frame would stop that Mother if you gave it a bit to much power, in fact they would be better if they were cemented down at the front to stop the whole lot going forward. btw what is the thrust of that engine?
    But I do applaud them for getting it up and running.

    in reply to: Dam Buster query #996917
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    Upkeep

    Some Lancasters were eventually converted back and some retained, being used for disposal of the Upkeep mines after the war (Operational Grapple).

    I thought Operation Grapple was Britains A bomb tests?

    in reply to: RB211 Ground run, possibly historic? #997666
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    jet

    That`s not a bird strike, it`s an explosive blade-off test which ensures the engine stays within the powerplant cowling, which it did.

    Pete

    And you think the rig the RB-211 is on would hold it down if that happened to
    it?

    in reply to: RB211 Ground run, possibly historic? #997805
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    jet

    Well all you people who think it’s “Terribly British” would have no problem being near it when this happens:D
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nWTb0QRIt0c

    in reply to: RB211 Ground run, possibly historic? #999677
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    jet

    I believe the local fire brigade is a man with a bucket two valleys away!

    😀

    in reply to: RB211 Ground run, possibly historic? #1000058
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    Jet

    I think you can take it or leave it, they have run the engine successfully a number of times causing no harm to themselves or anybody else on a custom rig that is concreted to a purpose built platform and is carried out far away (miles) from anyone,

    For those of you who can appreciate the eccentricity of running an RB211 in your back garden despite some questionable proximity to it at times I hope you enjoyed the video ;)Matt

    I can appreciate what they are doing and I dare say it’s great fun, but if it does go wrong then that custom rig will probably still be concreted to the purpose built platform, it’s just that the engine will be somewhere else.

    in reply to: General Discussion #255314
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    old

    Who remembers “Zoobs their good for your tubes”:D

    in reply to: Turning the clock back!! #1845772
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    old

    Who remembers “Zoobs their good for your tubes”:D

    in reply to: RB211 Ground run, possibly historic? #1000535
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    jet

    Jesus christ, someone is going to get seriously hurt if these people carry on.

    in reply to: RB211 Ground run, possibly historic? #1001391
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    RB211

    I would love to be filming that when it looses a blade or two, because that
    rig doesn’t look up to the job to me:D

    in reply to: 100 Squadron 95th #1002380
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    Hawk

    This is the paint job, Coningsby last week.

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v714/Bruggen/hawk3.jpg

    http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v714/Bruggen/hawk4.jpg

    in reply to: Falklands – Vulcan raids – backstory #1005645
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    bombs

    Nothing against the RAF effort and it may have been the world’s longest bombing run at the time….but” From 2 to 3 September 1996, two B-52H struck Baghdad power stations and communications facilities with 13 AGM-86C conventional air-launched cruise missiles (CALCM) as part of Operation Desert Strike, a 34-hour, 16,000-mile round trip mission from Andersen AFB, Guam – the longest distance ever flown for a combat mission.”

    Also, B-2s have flown combat missions to Kosovo, Iraq and Afghanistan from Missouri. Some missions are said to have lasted 50 hours.

    Nothing against the USAF effort but there is a big difference between flying
    OVER hostile territory and dropping BOMBS to flying 16,000 miles and launching cruise missiles whilst flying over friendly territory, how many miles
    from launch to target? and whats more why from Guam did they not have
    anything nearer to the target or was it as I suspect just a propagandar
    effort claim the longest mission. So sorry it was not a bombing mission
    All tongue in cheek of course

    in reply to: GoPro shots (B-24 and P-51 content) #1011526
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    space

    That bomb looks like it’s being dropped from space:D

    in reply to: Lightning/Spitfire Formation Picture #1011884
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    bolt

    By the way,
    My friend told me he was hit on the head by a screw that fell from an aircraft, turned out it was a Lightning Bolt
    Exit stage left:D

    No I think if you look at it closely you will see it’s a Thunder bolt:D

    in reply to: Vulcan Suffers Engine Damage #1012889
    Bruggen 130
    Participant

    No afterburn! What, you mean they set off ALL the car alarms at Weald with normal engines!! 🙂

    Yep:D

Viewing 15 posts - 676 through 690 (of 2,114 total)