dark light

avion ancien

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 5,209 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: DH 82A Tiger Moth N6665 History #1143784
    avion ancien
    Participant

    I assume that someone has taken a look at the DGAC website. I haven’t yet, but I’ll do so tomorrow unless someone else does so in the meantime!

    in reply to: DH 82A Tiger Moth N6665 History #1143666
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Then one less job for me tomorrow!

    in reply to: DH 82A Tiger Moth N6665 History #1143240
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Without wishing to sound pompous, it’s necessary to know a little of how the French civil aircraft register works before the DGAC website will serve you as an effective research tool. Firstly, as Laurence says, you need to know whether you are looking just for aircraft currently on the register (inscrit) or those now deleted from it (radié). Secondly entering the aircraft manufacturer (constructeur) will not necessarily reveal all the aircraft produced by it which are or were on the register. Often the restorer of a restored aircraft will register himself as the constructor . Thus searching against the aircraft type (modèle de aéronef) produces a more reliable result. However you have to be very precise as to what you enter. For example if, as in this case, you enter D.H.82A or Tiger Moth, it will tell you that there are none presently or formerly on the register. You have to enter DH 82 A to get a positive result. Thirdly not always will the previous identity of the aircraft be recorded but frequently a previous military identity will appear as the construction number (Nº serié).

    By entering DH 82 A against modèle de aéronef and ticking the inscrit box, five French registered Tiger Moths appear. These are

    F-AZPP (RAF serial not recorded)
    F-PMDS (RAF serial recorded as T7400)

    Both of these aircraft are recorded as their restorers, rather than de Havilland, being the manufacturer

    F-AZTM (RAF serial recorded as DF210)
    F-AZEI (RAF serial recorded as T6553)
    F-GTBO (construction number recorded as 3810, which may be the RAF serial number, less than prefix letter, or the true DH c/n)

    These are recorded against de Havilland as the manufacturer.

    Unless it is F-AZPP (try googling this registration to see if that reveals its RAF serial), none of these are the Tiger Moth for which you are searching, David. However that does not mean that N6665 is not lurking somewhere in France. However if it isn’t one of the five above and hasn’t been on the French register (which presumably are the other 155 through which you are going, David!), then you’ve got a difficult search on your hands and I suspect that the web won’t help you with it. Nonetheless, I wish you the best of luck!

    p.s. it seems that F-AZPP is not the aircraft for which you are looking as the photos online show it carrying the RAF serial T8857

    in reply to: Westland Wallace At Shuttleworth #1141861
    avion ancien
    Participant

    With what is/was it intended to power the Wallace replica?

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1141592
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Too easy, Groundhugger. It’s a SIPA MiniJet!

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1141608
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Are you able to tell me where and, approximately, when the photo was taken so that, finally, I might be able to apply a caption to it!

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1141620
    avion ancien
    Participant

    I don’t play this game – but since you’re talking about KZ-IIs, here’s one from my collection!

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1141511
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Oooooooooooooooh, now I’ve got think of something clever. Can I have until tomorrow to come up with something!

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1141273
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Oh well, I doubt that this will last long!

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1140900
    avion ancien
    Participant

    An intelligent and reasonable opinion – but not correct!

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1140537
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Sorry, Groundhugger, it’s not one of those either. However both you and John Aeroclub are in the right country and have basically the correct wing arrangement. But if you look carefully, this one has ailerons rather than an all moving wing.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1139957
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Off the top of my head, I think that there is one in the USA. I’ll check and post again later.

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1139265
    avion ancien
    Participant

    …………..and it’s not one of those either. I really didn’t think that this obscure aeroplane – even though it’s an obscure French aeroplane – would stump everyone, especially as it was being advertised for sale on eBay only last month! If it’s time for me to give more clues, let me know.

    in reply to: Interesting F4U project for sale #1139153
    avion ancien
    Participant

    ………..I wonder if the caption to the photograph should be: “what silly b****r closed the hangar doors when I was only half way out!”

    in reply to: The "Wot Plane" Thread. (Game rules in Post #1) #1139158
    avion ancien
    Participant

    Hello
    Can you tell us the year of it, please?
    It is not the Durand et Delaville RB-01 Beauregard…?

    That’s another one which it isn’t! This “wot plane” was designed in the 1950s (although its lineage goes back to the 1930s) but its construction wasn’t started until the late 1980s with the first flight taking place in 2003. It’s number 1 in a construction run of one!

Viewing 15 posts - 16 through 30 (of 5,209 total)