dark light

qwerty

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 157 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: JSF cockpit too small for tall dutch pilots #2499699
    qwerty
    Participant

    The design of the JSF will now take into account pilots up to 1.93 meters.

    That rules me out 😀

    in reply to: How would you form the European Air Force? #2453846
    qwerty
    Participant

    How would you form the European Air Force?

    With great difficulty. 😀

    in reply to: Place of the internal gun on A2A fighters #2474308
    qwerty
    Participant

    How many times and how many pilots does it take to have to relearn what history has proven over and over again?
    The aerial gun aboard a fighter does not have to be used in every air-to-air engagement!
    But if the need and circumstance arises, you can and will use it….

    Please, as you know the history and we obviously don’t, tell us:
    When was the last gun kill in aerial combat?
    How many gun kills in gulf 1991?
    How many gun kills in Lebanon 1982?
    How many gun kills in the Falklands 1982?
    How many gun kills during Iran-Iraq war 1980-88?

    During the Iran-Iraq war there were quite a few gun kills. Of the rest of the examples you cited the US-Iraqi wars were turkey-shoots (at least in terms of A2A action) from whom I don’t really think one can draw many useful conclusions about the value of internal guns. The last time America’s military forces really broke a serious sweat was over Korea although they did get a pretty good workout in Vietnam despite their numerical superiority over the NVAF. The Beeka Valley incident was different but even there there was major technology gap between the two forces and the gap in competence between the command of the IDF and Syrian Air Force and their respective tactics was enormous. Call me when the USAF/USN/Marines have proven guns utterly, utterly, useless in a conflict against a worthy enemy able to match them on every level in terms of resources, tactics, technology, force multipliers, force size and force quality. I’m not holding my breath.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #11 #2454372
    qwerty
    Participant

    Possible SLAF F-7SG?

    http://www.sundaytimes.lk/080803/images/Fighter-jet.jpg

    compare to:

    F-7PG (Pakistan) – http://cnair.top81.cn/fighter/F-7PG7.jpg
    F-7BG (Bangladesh) – http://cnair.top81.cn/fighter/F-7BG3.jpg
    F-7NM (Namibian) – http://cnair.top81.cn/fighter/F-7NM.jpg

    J-7G –
    http://cnair.top81.cn/fighter/J-7G3.jpg
    http://cnair.top81.cn/fighter/J-7G1.jpg
    http://cnair.top81.cn/fighter/J-7G_3view.jpg

    all from – http://cnair.top81.cn/F-7_J-7_J-8.htm

    Hui Tong, could you confirm?

    The blade antenna behind the cockpit sure looks like the one on a G model to me.

    BTW does anybody know if the Namibian F-7s carry wing markings?

    in reply to: FC-20 #2459979
    qwerty
    Participant

    Did someone sell the PLAAF Paveways? or is it a fantasy store?

    The PLAAF has a modular low drag bomb in the same class as American Mk.80 series. The PLAAF has also developed a series of laser guidance kits for it. Some of these kits look a lot like the American Paveway II kit.

    http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/weapon/bomb_gp.asp
    http://www.sinodefence.com/airforce/weapon/lt2.asp

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #10 #2462944
    qwerty
    Participant

    No way Flex, the one I remember was a clear pic of an F-7 in a colourful (I think) grey and blue camo scheme. It was removed a day or so after posting. Maybe it wasn’t Banshee…

    I’d like to see that photo, who owned the ©opy right ?

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #10 #2463675
    qwerty
    Participant

    Angolan G.91

    AFAIK this one is a myth.

    in reply to: Russia flogging MiG-27s to Serbia? #2464415
    qwerty
    Participant

    …..while in Africa Air to Air duties are pretty irrelevant.

    They are? The last African war to see significant A2A engagements was the Badme war and it included BVR engagements. There have been plenty of wars in Africa where A2A featured prominently. Just ask the SAAF how irrelevant A2A is in Africa. I’m sure they’ll be surprised to know they wasted their money on those Gripens.

    in reply to: Harrier GR.3 and the Paveway II #2470998
    qwerty
    Participant

    UK Paveway II used the standard UK 1000lb MC bomb, with modified Paveway II head and tail fittings…

    I just assumed they would have used Mk.80s. I had no idea they adapted the kit to the UK made bombs. Do you know where I can find a photo of one of these?

    in reply to: Harrier GR.3 and the Paveway II #2471379
    qwerty
    Participant

    2, cluster bombs. Each with 146 bomblets. Very effective, but short in number during the conflict. Many stores were lost with the Atlantic Conveyor sinking.

    Would that have been the BL.755?

    2, 1000lbs free fall bombs
    2, laser guided bombs, 1,200 lb (1000 lb bomb with guidance package and fins) guided by ground forces, often with dead batteries or lack of trained users as mentioned above.
    2, 1000 lb retarded bombs

    The Paveways IIs were based on the American Mk.80 series but what about the 1000lb bombs were they a British made type? The ones I have seen in photos in my Osprey book don’t look like Mk.83s.

    2, shrike anti radar missles are listed in Pook’s book, but do not think they were used much.

    The Shrikes were apparently carried by the Vulcans who flew out of Ascension island. So if the none of the aircraft in the RN carrier group could launch them that explains why they were so little used, 6200 km is an awful long way to fly just to launch a Shrike. According to the Wikipedia article on the Black Buck raids a Vulcan used a Shrike to destroy an Argentine Skyguard radar. It’s a pity they retired the Vulcan. After the Falklands experience the RAF must miss the capability they represented.

    P.S. Thanks for the tip I ordered that book.

    in reply to: Harrier GR.3 and the Paveway II #2471843
    qwerty
    Participant

    Thanks again for your input guys.

    What other A2G munitions did the GR.3 carry during the Falklands campaign?

    The obvious canditates are:

    • Mk.80 series dumb.
    • Mk. 80 series with Paveway II kits.
    • Rocketpods (calibers? types?)
    • Cluster bombs (types?)

    Anything else?

    The Argentines deployed Roland batteries to the Falklands didn’t they? It seems very unlikely that the GR.3 was capable of launching anti FLAK/Sam/Radar missiles like the Shrike? How did the British handle SAM/FLAK suppression?

    Oh and did the Sea Harriers ever get sent on strike missions?

    in reply to: KC767, KC45 ….. Latest news! #2472315
    qwerty
    Participant

    It’s official. The tanker contract is voided. An expedited competition will be run with the OSD acting as the source selection authority.

    http://uk.reuters.com/article/governmentFilingsNews/idUKN0939034420080709?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0

    As if that wasn’t guaranteed to happen. I expect Boeing is pretty much guaranteed to win.

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #10 #2473751
    qwerty
    Participant

    The world’s first female Su-27 pilot

    How many women do they have flying Flankers? I seem to remember a report on Acig.org a few years back about a female Ethiopian Su-27 driver (Cpt. Tolossa) shooting down an Eritrean MiG-29U.

    in reply to: Who made the best Mig 21? #2481740
    qwerty
    Participant

    You need to read the title of the tread again then. Its ‘who made the best Mig21’, and ‘best’ does not mean who can win at BVR. Being the ‘best’ means being the most suitable for the AF that buys it. I have said from the start and I will say again here, the J7 and Bison have different strengths in different departments. Which set of strengths is better depends on the beholder.

    If you stuck an ELTA radar and in a J-7G and fitted it with Derbys (assuming that is both possible and economically viable) and some sort of simple datalink capability it would actually look more or less just as good as the Bison. Not that this matters, the J-7 will probably never be fitted with that sort of equipment.

    Almost everybody for whom the J-7G or MiG-21Bis is still an option does not need BVR or can’t afford it. Most of the customers for these aircraft are poor nations making the IAF something of an exception and even for them the Bison a stopgap. Poor nations consider these aircraft only because they want to make the most of their money. The J/F-7 is available, new built, at low prices and the Chinese don’t start to sulk like the Russians tend to do if the customer decides to put Western or Israeli avionics and weapons in his airframes. The only thing that surprises me about the F-7 export variant any more is that it still manages to find customers. One would think anybody shopping for an aircraft in this class would be lining up for the FC-1.

    in reply to: Who made the best Mig 21? #2481911
    qwerty
    Participant

    even now, the Bison provides the IAF with a platform that can deal with the

    Ankushbulk of the PAF’s fleet, except for the newer F-16s. its potent for its size and cost and almost everyone here agrees with that.

    I don’t think that anybody seriously thinks the Bison is a waste of money for the IAF. It is an economical stopgap for them pending delivery of more modern aircraft and it will serve well in that role given the tactics of the IAF until something like the HAL Tejas replaces it.

    However, completely writing off the F-7 because it has no BVR is not fair. Given other operational environments than those specific to the IAF, BVR does not matter that much. In that case buying an F-7G might make more sense than getting ahold of a bunch of retired MiG-21Bis fighters from somebody’s bone yard and upgrading them to MiG-21-93 standard. The F-7G is probably a better WVR performer and it is new built. I thought bring_it_on summed it up rather well:

    I never questioned the utility of the bison for the IAF , its upgrade and BVR capability will serve the IAF very well given that they are always going to be operating with a good GBR setup with AEW aircraft and with More modern A2A aircrafts such as Su-30 , M2k , Mig-29 and LCA .

    All i said was that for a poor nation looking to get a rudemantary FIghter force – are better of with a nasty dog fighter and spend money on low level attack training and dogfighting trainig rather then aquire BVR which is very expensive to effectivly execute.

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 157 total)