Whirlwind Ident
the next number after the last Whirlwind – spaces between allocated blocks of numbers were often left for security reasons
or
the identity of the airframe from which largest piece of original material (aka wreckage) has been incorporated into the rebuild.
think it has been at Yeovilton for quite some time
http://www.nationalhistoricships.org.uk/ships_register.php?action=ship&id=712
I hardly dare say it but………………..
Will it be at Legends?
What are the row of protrusions running along the lower edges of the canopy? PA474 doesn’t have them….
perhaps they’re fasteners for a canopy cover when the airframe is on the ground?
Anybody know what’s happening with the East Fortune example?
The relevance of the Il2 in the milestones of flight was as jeepman rightly points out, the Il2 was the most numerous military aircraft of all time… Thats why it was going to be in milestones of flight.
as well as the fact that the Museum now holds examples of aircraft from each of the major combatants in the Second World War – UK and Empire/Dominions+USA+USSR+Germany+Italy+Japan – not forgetting the fact that RAF & USA types were flown by pilots from the occupied countries
And if we have an Il-2 on show, perhaps they might give us our Stirling back :diablo:
The RAF flew B17’s with coastal command !
and 100 Group on Bomber Support and Radio Counter Measures missions
Ha ha! I remember that!
Well folks, thanks for the posts – I’ll be sorry if RAFM doesnt get an Il-2 – rather partial to something Ruski me…
All the best
TT
is there any reason why they shouldn’t?
do you know something we don’t….. 🙂
Why would the RAF Museum want a Sturmovik. The RAF never flew them or barring Korea ever fought against them. Let the russians keep their junk and give us our Stirling back 🙂
John
For the Millstones of Flight Hall presumably
Wasn’t the Il-2/10 line the most numerous military aircraft design of all time?
I would have thought that was enough justification to include in the Hendon collections
just interested – suppose somebody resurrected the High Speed Spitfire
Could they get dispensation from the CAA for it to fly in Class B markings in the same way that military aircraft can get permission to fly in military marks?
Since retro-fitted with the canopy it should have had….
Not quite apparently
it’s a “thick-framed” Me109G type canopy, rather than the thinner framed sort originally fitted to the Me109E-4/7.
or so they say…………..
Yes, I have that as Sheffield but not been able to confirm it. Someone will!
Sure is Sheffield – It’s in Barkers Pool. Thats the City Hall and the (now demolished) Grand Hotel behind
see
Then, a few years down the line, BAE could take them all to bits, fit different wings, engines & avionics, except this time it’ll be called the Shackleton 3000, just to give then a chance of getting it ready on time. :diablo:
And then we could scrap them just before they come into service….
ps anybody seen the Sunday Times today……….
the way things are going with the RAF, soon all that will be left will the BBMF
you’d have a handful of fighters to fight, a bomber to bomb, a transport to transport and trainers to train
with the originals, you wouldn’t have to put anything back into production
Haven’t we been here before?
wonder if we’ll ever see another “Expansion period”
talking of buried Spitfires…
what became of the Spitfires buried in Burma
and
the above ground Indian decoys mentioned by Peter Vacher in his book on R4118?
Presumably Volume 2 might include an addendum to Volume 1