dark light

jeepman

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1,066 through 1,080 (of 1,647 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whirlwind Ident #1091171
    jeepman
    Participant

    Whirlwind Ident

    the next number after the last Whirlwind – spaces between allocated blocks of numbers were often left for security reasons

    or

    the identity of the airframe from which largest piece of original material (aka wreckage) has been incorporated into the rebuild.

    in reply to: WW1 Seaplane Lighter Found. FAAM #1101784
    jeepman
    Participant

    think it has been at Yeovilton for quite some time

    http://www.nationalhistoricships.org.uk/ships_register.php?action=ship&id=712

    in reply to: Spitfire Survivors out? #1104122
    jeepman
    Participant

    I hardly dare say it but………………..

    Will it be at Legends?

    in reply to: Another Lancaster Bomber Restored #1115320
    jeepman
    Participant

    What are the row of protrusions running along the lower edges of the canopy? PA474 doesn’t have them….

    perhaps they’re fasteners for a canopy cover when the airframe is on the ground?

    in reply to: Beaufighter to Australia in 2011 #1118870
    jeepman
    Participant

    Anybody know what’s happening with the East Fortune example?

    in reply to: RAF Museum Sturmovik #1121811
    jeepman
    Participant

    The relevance of the Il2 in the milestones of flight was as jeepman rightly points out, the Il2 was the most numerous military aircraft of all time… Thats why it was going to be in milestones of flight.

    as well as the fact that the Museum now holds examples of aircraft from each of the major combatants in the Second World War – UK and Empire/Dominions+USA+USSR+Germany+Italy+Japan – not forgetting the fact that RAF & USA types were flown by pilots from the occupied countries

    And if we have an Il-2 on show, perhaps they might give us our Stirling back :diablo:

    in reply to: RAF Museum Sturmovik #1121974
    jeepman
    Participant

    The RAF flew B17’s with coastal command !

    and 100 Group on Bomber Support and Radio Counter Measures missions

    in reply to: RAF Museum Sturmovik #1122820
    jeepman
    Participant

    Ha ha! I remember that!

    Well folks, thanks for the posts – I’ll be sorry if RAFM doesnt get an Il-2 – rather partial to something Ruski me…

    All the best

    TT

    is there any reason why they shouldn’t?

    do you know something we don’t….. 🙂

    in reply to: RAF Museum Sturmovik #1126010
    jeepman
    Participant

    Why would the RAF Museum want a Sturmovik. The RAF never flew them or barring Korea ever fought against them. Let the russians keep their junk and give us our Stirling back 🙂

    John

    For the Millstones of Flight Hall presumably

    Wasn’t the Il-2/10 line the most numerous military aircraft design of all time?

    I would have thought that was enough justification to include in the Hendon collections

    in reply to: Speed Spitfire N17 #1129931
    jeepman
    Participant

    just interested – suppose somebody resurrected the High Speed Spitfire

    Could they get dispensation from the CAA for it to fly in Class B markings in the same way that military aircraft can get permission to fly in military marks?

    in reply to: Messerschmitt 109-E…..where?? #1130614
    jeepman
    Participant

    Since retro-fitted with the canopy it should have had….

    Not quite apparently

    it’s a “thick-framed” Me109G type canopy, rather than the thinner framed sort originally fitted to the Me109E-4/7.

    or so they say…………..

    Yes, I have that as Sheffield but not been able to confirm it. Someone will!

    Sure is Sheffield – It’s in Barkers Pool. Thats the City Hall and the (now demolished) Grand Hotel behind

    see

    http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=546625

    jeepman
    Participant

    Then, a few years down the line, BAE could take them all to bits, fit different wings, engines & avionics, except this time it’ll be called the Shackleton 3000, just to give then a chance of getting it ready on time. :diablo:

    And then we could scrap them just before they come into service….

    ps anybody seen the Sunday Times today……….

    jeepman
    Participant

    the way things are going with the RAF, soon all that will be left will the BBMF

    you’d have a handful of fighters to fight, a bomber to bomb, a transport to transport and trainers to train

    with the originals, you wouldn’t have to put anything back into production

    Haven’t we been here before?

    wonder if we’ll ever see another “Expansion period”

    in reply to: The Spitfires down a Australian Mine Story gets a Reprise #1140771
    jeepman
    Participant

    talking of buried Spitfires…

    what became of the Spitfires buried in Burma

    and

    the above ground Indian decoys mentioned by Peter Vacher in his book on R4118?

    in reply to: Spitfire IX at Speyer #1140787
    jeepman
    Participant

    Presumably Volume 2 might include an addendum to Volume 1

Viewing 15 posts - 1,066 through 1,080 (of 1,647 total)