Boeing was planning on offering the An-72 Coaler into the FCA competition.I’m not sure if they’re still in,but if they are,then the An-72 would offer advantages over both the C-27J and C-295 in speed and range,the C-27J would be able to carry a bit more,payload wise.In this role,it would be like a mini C-17.Be pretty interesting seeing a former Soviet airlifter in American markings too.
At one time or another,Japan was looking at a number of different versions of the C-1.These included a refueling tanker,an AWACS model and I believe a maritime partol model.In the end,only the basic cargo model was built.
Thank you,I put new stuff up somewhat regularly so check back every now and again if you’re interested..As far as IIAF or IRAF.either,lol.
I heard something along the lines of Boeing marketing the An-72 as a new US Army transport aircraft,I assume to replace the Shorts 330 and 360 based C-23B Sherpas.
Interesting! Have you tried coming up with a Tornado (IDS please) in RMAF colours too? :diablo:
I have thought about it and also a Jordanian IDS model too,but as of yet,haven’t found a good side view to base it on,but I’m working on it.The other problem is Photobucket resizes it from a nice sized pic,to that little thing,so on most of my drawings,you can’t really make out the detail you could on a full sized copy.Just finished a couple AH-1W SuperCobras last night,one from Saudi Arabia,in the 3 tone desert camo,and a German PAH-2 model.Getting back to the A-7,I was thinking of doing one of the A-7G models Switzerland was supposed to get.Heres a link to my photobucket album to see some of what I’ve done.http://photobucket.com/albums/c177/OPFOR/
Anyone got a picture of that A-7 in Pakistani markings?

Heres something I came up with.I think finding the real pic would be like finding the Tornado IDS done up in Malaysian markings.
Perfect Iranian F14A! That’s EXACTLY the good reason why the Atar was proposed!!
:p 🙂
If we compare the ultimate Atar, the 9K50 ( the Mirage F1 and Mirage 50 engine) it had a thrust (with reheat) of 7200kgp. The first phantom’s J79 had 7700kgp, and the last 8120kgp. So the loss was not enormous… but that’s right the Atar was less powerful than the J79 (ask the Israelis 🙂 )
Thats right,which is why the Israelis went with the J-79 on the Kfir,rather then the Atar.As far as the Spey goes,you’re right,it offered more thrust,but the larger intake and since it was a larger engine,negated the performance.If I remember right,the Spey was good for high altitude missions,like bomber interception,but at low level,was slower and offered less range then the J-79.
What is the story on these two helo crashes?
From what I’ve read,the CH-53 was on a resupply flight into a fire base when it was hit by a Vietnamese mortar round in the cockpit,killing the crew instantly.It was an early model CH-53A Sea Stallion.
I assumes you mean the CH-47 in Afghanistan as the other one.It was a Special Forces MH-47Es shot down in the area with heavy machine guns and RPGs.I know at least 2 were shot down,and I think another one was seriously damaged,but managed to limp away from the fight,so the crew could get rescued and the damaged chopper was destroyed by a LGB.I could be mistaken.
The bottom pic showing the Mi-28 concepts looks alot like modified Hinds,while the Mi-24 mockup looks almost like a UH-1 with a longer tailboom,not the fearsome Hind of today.Although,I’d like to know how they expected to fire the missiles off without shooting themselves down.Judging by the angle the missiles are facing,they’d have gone right into the rotors.Very interesting though.
The F-4C with Atar 9?
Why would you give the F-4 an engine with less power? Do you want a less capable airplane?
Look at the Brits and their F-4K/M with the Speys.It had worse performance then the J-79s of American Phantoms.Its all about being common with existing systems.The Atars were in service with the air force’s Mirage IIIOs,so having a F-4 with the same engines would ease the logistics support.
As far as I know,
1.No,the DRAAF never got the Mi-35P Hind F
2.All I’ve ever seen has been the green/yellow camo
They got Kayra targeting system on the same place, as well as internally mounted six-barrel 23mm Gatling..
I heard a while back that the Kayra was roughly the same,performance wise as the American Pave Tack pod carried in the F-111F’s weapons bay.As far as being better,I’m not sure,it is however a more compact design sompared to the large Pave Tack.Another interesting thing to point out is the F-111 itself never really used the bombay for weapons.Mostley,either the Pave Tack was carried in the “F” models,also the Aussie “C”s.The “D” s could carry an internal M-61 Vulcan.It was also used to carry extra fuel and on deployments,used as a huge baggage area.I think the only model to really use the weapons bay would have been the strategic FB-111As.
Do these have internal bomb bays ?
No,unlike the F-111,the Fencer has no internal bomb bay.
That first one is a UH-1N Twin Huey of the US Marines.If you look hard on tailboom,you’ll notice “Marines” nice pic though.Love the FLIR equipped Hueys.
China also recently flew the two seat Q-5J Fantan.This is a combat capable trainer version.This could also be the basis for a more advanced two seat night/all weather model.