Don’t mix canabis, whiskey and wine. It would be a lot easier to use another helicopter instead, or as the yanks do, a Hercules. The Harrier would use as much fuel keeping station as it was carrying extra or perhaps more. It can’t carry that much anyway. No offence but it is not practical.
Phil
You know whats wierd? I did not know whether feel elated or horrified. I think its called a juxtaposition.
Phil
You know whats wierd? I did not know whether feel elated or horrified. I think its called a juxtaposition.
Phil
can anyone explain how a pumpjet propulsor works and is it too big to install on SSK ?
the newest lines of US and british SSNs have replaced the propeller with this.
is the water sucked in, the turbine is internal and the water jet pushed out of the back?
Royal Navy subs have been using this tech since the mid 80s mate though I don’t claim to know how it works.
Phil 🙂
It wasn’t me who started it, or was it me? I only did politely point to the last topic where we had the chance of venting our opposing views, the one where you started your nasty manner of calling me words I have to go look up in my 1976 OXFORD dictionary only to find out they may have multiple deriding meanings. Calling me a sodomite?, how come would you know what my sexual appetites are…[
Nah chap ‘Oh bugger’ means ‘Oh bloody hell’ or ‘Oh no’, I am not casting aspertions upon your sexual appetites not that it would be any of my business.
That was hardly a rebuttle. Altought I do agree with my pal Phil that we should stay on topic.
Glad we’re mates again then. 😀
Phil 🙂
Oh bugger, we’re not going to have this argument again. Jester do you fancy starting a thread about the Falklands/Malvinas sovereignty issue because I don’t think this thread is about that. Not wishing to antagonise anybody but we have a history of diverting all South American issues that have any British content into a Falklands/Malvinas sovereignty issue.
I wonder if this might be in case Argentina decides to go island shopping… (Falklands)
Ed, mate, it’ll all end in tears. Lets keep it on topic.
All
If you like I’ll start a Falklands/Mavinas Sovereignty thread if you really want one, lets call it ‘Lighting the blue touch paper and standing well back.’ :rolleyes:
Phil 🙂
haha morning mate !
well i just said the bbc did it i never said we arent allowed to do it 😉
No worries bloke, you know me. Just having a bitch. 😉
Phil 🙂
hey phill i will have to agree with blackcat on this one they did make a big deal out of it almost like they were getting pleasure from it.
But i am suprised that private firms were not asked to rescue the guys i am sure their are some that own dsrv’s
Well maybe I don’t pay much attention but lets face it if the Yanks did something great or the Russians or the Indians or anybody else then their own news agencies would also make something of it and nobody would bat an eyelid. I suppose being Brits we are not allowed to or something :rolleyes: .
Phil 🙂
yeah sure …. BBC was flasing it for everyone coz of that .. its not to belittle the RN teams effort, but wanted to put h $astardly the media is when thing happen … u neded to look back h the things were when Krushk , Beslan & more recently the Krivov class ‘blast’ happened ….
Well the BBC did indeed report it, they were’nt bragging, they were just reporting. Lets be frank Blackcat when it comes to anything British you have a history of trying to belittle them, unsuccessfully mostly but nonetheless………….
Phil
The fact that they had him safely pinned to the ground before shooting him dead points to the idea that he could have been shot with his hands in the air had he obeyed these shouted commands. But lets think about the men shouting at you to stop, not in uniform but in casual gear, whilst waving guns around. Would you stop and ask them what they were doing? Do you stop when driving when you hear emergency sirens and ask them where they are going?
Nermal I hear you and in the main I sympathise but I’d like to make a few points. First, the shooting happened because you can still detonate a bomb whilst being restrained. Second, and I am only guessing here, I am no expert, but I’d say he was pinned and covered by the officers to minimise the effect of the detonation if it had happened.
I feel awful about what happened to this poor bloke and if the decision was yours then perhaps you could judge it. Seeing as it wasn’t give the poor buggers a break, I don’t know what you do for a living but I’ll bet it ain’t half as difficult as their job as of 07/07/05.
Phil 🙂
The fact that they had him safely pinned to the ground before shooting him dead points to the idea that he could have been shot with his hands in the air had he obeyed these shouted commands. But lets think about the men shouting at you to stop, not in uniform but in casual gear, whilst waving guns around. Would you stop and ask them what they were doing? Do you stop when driving when you hear emergency sirens and ask them where they are going?
Nermal I hear you and in the main I sympathise but I’d like to make a few points. First, the shooting happened because you can still detonate a bomb whilst being restrained. Second, and I am only guessing here, I am no expert, but I’d say he was pinned and covered by the officers to minimise the effect of the detonation if it had happened.
I feel awful about what happened to this poor bloke and if the decision was yours then perhaps you could judge it. Seeing as it wasn’t give the poor buggers a break, I don’t know what you do for a living but I’ll bet it ain’t half as difficult as their job as of 07/07/05.
Phil 🙂
From what I’ve seen here, the man was actually subdued and THEN shoot.
I don’t know how Scotland Yard does things, but here when a suspect is subdued, kicking or hitting him is a major no no, let alone pumping 5 bullets into him.
…….because, unfortunately, you can still detonate a bomb if you are subdued, the flick of a finger or wrist, the nod of a head, how do you know how the bombs are triggered, I’ll bet the police know and you don’t.
Phil
From what I’ve seen here, the man was actually subdued and THEN shoot.
I don’t know how Scotland Yard does things, but here when a suspect is subdued, kicking or hitting him is a major no no, let alone pumping 5 bullets into him.
…….because, unfortunately, you can still detonate a bomb if you are subdued, the flick of a finger or wrist, the nod of a head, how do you know how the bombs are triggered, I’ll bet the police know and you don’t.
Phil
Very nice pics I think I’ve got wood 😀
Last year I was in the Dulas Valley near Machynlleth in Wales when I saw two Su22 Fitters flying low level (doing the ‘Machynlleth Loop’ as I believe the RAF calls it.) I never got the shots but it was only after that that I heard the Polish Air Force was ‘in town’ training with the Jag’ force out of Coltishall. Hawks, Jags, Tornados and even Hercules’ are ten-a-penny down that route but a couple of ex-Warpac strike fighters was just about the sexiest thing I’d seen all year; and it was a good year for me and military aviation.
Phil 🙂
So how come the original Harrier is ugly and the new one isn’t?
X32 gets it for me but beauty is in the eye I suppose. I notice the A10 isn’t in there and also ugly can have beauty all of its own. Like when you see the things actually flying. There is something pretty spectacular about watching something that looks like it shouldn’t fly actually fly very well indeed. Photographs often don’t do the subject any favours at all.
Phil 🙂