dark light

Phil Foster

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 1,404 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • Phil Foster
    Participant

    Dunno. More advanced conventional wing design? More advanced avionics and control systems, more advanced engine design and engine management. By advanced I mean more efficient. Swing wing was supposed to give high lift in one position and low drag in another. Modern wings are getting close to incorporating those two attributes into a conventional design that is easier and cheaper to build, has less weight and lower maintenence. Swing wing was never going to last long really.

    Phil

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2660951
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    As For typhoon T-2 its capabilities are far from equaling that of Rafale. It is not even equal to F-2 standards…

    Okay Fonk lets here your ‘expert’ ‘opinion’ on this. Are you saying it isn’t as good as the Rafale at this stage in its ‘stepped’ programme?

    Or are you saying it will not be, nay, could never be as good as the Rafale?

    Phil :rolleyes:

    in reply to: UK military plane crashes in Iraq #2662546
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    I never know what to say when this happens. My thoughts to the families I suppose. I really am very sorry.

    Phil

    in reply to: F/A-18E/F's engine doubt #2606810
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Yep you are confused with the 404 I think.

    Phil

    in reply to: F/A-18E/F's engine doubt #2606812
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Yep you are confused with the 404 I think.

    Phil

    in reply to: Yf 23 or YF 22? #2606814
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Asthetics aside I think they would both have done a superb job but asthetics in mind, sorry it just has to be the 23.

    Phil

    in reply to: Yf 23 or YF 22? #2606817
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Asthetics aside I think they would both have done a superb job but asthetics in mind, sorry it just has to be the 23.

    Phil

    in reply to: C-130J FLUNKS evaluation.!!! #2607484
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    http://www.codeonemagazine.com/archives/2004/articles/aug_04/rafc130/

    Hmm, RAF actually uses the plane and they aren’t complaining….

    I was going to mention that but expected the Brit bashers to start banging their gongs so I didn’t bother. Glad somebody else did.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: A Multi-Billion Dollar Question #2608503
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Your costs for the Eurofighter are as per usual way over what they actually are. The Telgraphs reports are deliberately and artificially too high and its specs and capabilities are deftly under stated. I am afraid that in order to have a meaningful debate on the subject facts must be presented, not the musings of a newspaper that is fundamentally opposed to this project.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2608557
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Okay seeing as I started this thread I think I should try to adjudicate. I did not compare the capabilities of these two aircraft in relation to each other or any other type. I don’t even think that is quantifiable though on the face of it the F22 should come out on top. I was talking about the cost of the Typhoon and comparing that to the cost of the F22 and trying as hard as I might to find out the real costs using yourselves as fellow aviation nuts to help me find out what the real costs are because I am interested.

    I am not interested in anti British, anti American, anti Russian or anti whatever BS because some small minded idiot has a cross to bear and a chip on his/her shoulder, a bias point of view and thinks that the Brits or the Yanks or the Ruskies or anybody else can’t build a decent fighter plane worth a damn (scuse the Americanism).

    I’m talking about costs so for christs sake get a grip and, if you have a mind, tell me what you know, what you think you know or what you have read about it and try to keep the arguing to a minimum and try to come to some kind of consensus. It matters not one jot to the sales prospects of these machines based on somebody’s opinion of the people who built it.

    Thanks

    Phil

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2608718
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Of course and I tried to make that point. Just getting the F-22s radar echo profile wrong, ie. how efficient you assume stealth to be, would make a huge difference. That being said the DERA was a UK-MOD entity wasn’t it? You would expect their information to be more accurate than other peoples. If the US trusts anybody with F-22 data it would be the British.

    If you go and read about the history of stealth you will be sickened to find that there is very little that the British don’t already know about it.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2608730
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    in all probability russian RWRs also have yet to advance to the extent where they can detect and lock on to LPI emissions from APG-77, especially when used in its low-power EMCON mode. in that sense the Raptor will have a much better idea of where the Sukhoi is than the Sukhoi(using IRST only) has of where the Raptor is. chances are the Raptor will see first, and shoot first. the only question left is whether the Sukhoi can jam the AMRAAM. hmm…..

    Raptor and Typhoon are basically worlds apart – in radar, performance, agility, and stealthiness. the price tag for a Tranche 3 Typhoon will be much higher than Tranche 2 figures quoted here, and even that would not bring it to a level close to that of the Raptor. i would rather have 1 F/A-22A than 4 Typhoons.

    of course, this is a moot point as long as the Raptor and Typhoon don’t end up fighting each other. the Typhoon is indeed good enough to beat the SU-35; with this analysis you could say the Raptor is overkill and the Typhoon is a bargain. but when the PAK-FA enters service and owns your Typhoons then you’d wish you ordered those Raptors even if you’d have ended up with fewer of them.

    Damn I forgot we had experts on this forum. :diablo:

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: Cost for the Typhoon #2608736
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    I think it is interesting to compare this eurofighter order with the last rafale order :

    Eurofighter tranche 2 :

    – 236 jets
    – €13 billion
    – €55.08 million “fly away” unit cost

    Rafale F3 :

    – 59 jets
    – €3.1 billion
    – €52.5 million “fly away” unit cost

    As we can see, The typhoon is a bit more expessive (€2.5 million) even with an order 4 times bigger.

    Those figures agree with me and disagree with Dinger. I think Dinger might be in error with some of his figures.

    Phil 🙂

    in reply to: Hurricane Skinpack coming soon to IL2FB/Pacific fighters #242848
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Oh dear I have come over all unnccessary again.

    in reply to: Two of the RAAF Roulettes aerobatic display team collide. #2610482
    Phil Foster
    Participant

    Glad nobody was hurt.

Viewing 15 posts - 466 through 480 (of 1,404 total)