dark light

snake65

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 746 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2015710
    snake65
    Participant

    any pictures of these vietnamese ones?
    also are they built in Tatarstan? isn’t that quite far from the ocean?

    Under tests in Baltic.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2017745
    snake65
    Participant

    The second photo is Nevksy, isn’t it?

    Yes, two silos were opened during Putin’s short visit today.

    http://tv29.ru/?bl60number=4423

    in reply to: Gayduck, Ukraine corvette Prject 58250 #2017906
    snake65
    Participant

    Ah! So “Gaidak” is probably an attempt to avoid jokes in English. πŸ˜‰

    ΠΉ is transliterated Y or I depending on taste, & I think I is better in this case, but Ρƒ is definitely U.

    Yes, therefore the closest pronounciation transcription is Hi-dook. Ukrainians pronounce G as a mix of g anf h, almost like Dutch.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2019181
    snake65
    Participant

    The launch has been postponed for a week, too cold weather (minus 25-30) is cited as reason.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2019816
    snake65
    Participant

    Almaz-Antey reports saids that MOD was demonstrated with KM-SAM and the Vityaz system will be much more superior to KM-SAM.

    They say that KM-SAM is the Vityaz modified with foreign components and thanks to this contract they were able to prove the system to Russian MoD and the Vityaz for Russian armed forces will have better performance.:rolleyes:

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2019817
    snake65
    Participant

    You got me all confused there.

    What does the short range Morfey have to do with the long range S-500?

    Also, what do we know so far about the Morfey?

    Morfey is supposed to be the short range self-defence component of S-500 system.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2019841
    snake65
    Participant

    Regarding KM-SAM, what exactly is Almaz-Antey’s share of the system? The missiles are often alleged to be 9M96 variants, but seem to lack canard controls – in many ways they resemble the 9M100 more closely. Is the radar Korean or Russian? Primeportal has a nice walk-around of the radar vehicle:

    Almaz-Antey claims that KM-SAM is export version of Vityaz, using some Western components.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2019869
    snake65
    Participant

    There doesn’t seem to be anything official on it apart from the name mentioned here and there.

    ‘Snake’ mentioned on one of these threads some time ago that it has 4 channels per face (4 x 4)…..not sure if his willing to share more with us.

    Well, the 4 channels per face come from the fact that each face consists of 4 modules. Keeping in mind, that 9M96 is active radar missile, only midcourse updates are required. Therefore, the number of channels is quite conserative.

    Vityaz SAM is considered to be the land based counterpart of Redut/Poliment. You can have a look at it’s export version – South Korean KM-SAM, Almaz-Antey has delivered three units by now.

    I attach pictures of elements of 42Ya6 APAR for Morfey short-range SAM which is under development by Almaz-Antey as part of S-500 system. This gives quite good appreciation of components used in Poliment as well.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2020248
    snake65
    Participant

    http://arms-tass.su/?page=article&aid=90239&cid=44

    Before the end of November, the second Boreii, the Alexander Nevsky is planned for launch.

    30th November

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2020961
    snake65
    Participant

    That’s true, Balancer’s forums have a lot of insiders contributing.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2023064
    snake65
    Participant

    The 20380’s have composite masts, no reason to think the entire superstructure will be steel, highly unlikely in fact.

    Entire superstructure on 20380 is composite, not only masts. This is one of the reasons for slow build – only one plant in Russia has the technology. The superstructure is not sturdy enough – in fresh weather Puma and Furke have problems.

    22350 superstructure is almost totally steel.

    in reply to: HMS Astute runs aground. #2023335
    snake65
    Participant

    First of class, new ship handling system, very tight waters for an SSN. Not a great advert for the service, but, not as bad as what happened to the leadship of the S-class boats!.

    What exactly is first of class with a new handling system testing in so tight waters for an SSN so early in the test phase?

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2023492
    snake65
    Participant

    While we wait for the Gorshkov launch, here are a few photos of the SOOBRAZITELNY. Yhe images are several weeks old.

    The first is from July, the second is even older.

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2024430
    snake65
    Participant

    It shares no direct legacy with the Talwar/Krivak line.

    Just the same design bureau and it’s a frigate of similar dimensions πŸ˜‰

    in reply to: Russian Navy News & Discussion, Part III #2024511
    snake65
    Participant

    Gorshkov in floating dock. Launch scheduled 29 October.

Viewing 15 posts - 166 through 180 (of 746 total)