dark light

giganick1

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 339 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Seaking replacements in Falklands #2251505
    giganick1
    Participant

    I don’t think Lynx could carry those loads….

    I have heard Puma somewhere (can’t remember and don’t believe)

    I personally see Merlin but we will see

    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2251701
    giganick1
    Participant

    And if any of you have been naughty we’re going to send you a strongly worded letter!

    Not to justify the drone attacks that is, but I doubt the UN investigation will come to anything.

    I totally agree with you there, but then again the UK’s Drones only operate in Afgan so what is wrong with that, I mean they do their best over civilian casualties, remember the Harrier that redirected its Paveway to avoid casulties…

    in reply to: Navies news from around the world -IV #2006638
    giganick1
    Participant
    in reply to: Military Aviation News-2013 #2251815
    giganick1
    Participant
    in reply to: Closed RAF stations you'd like to see back #944273
    giganick1
    Participant

    I would really like to see Lyneham come back, I mean I would personally leave Brize to the tanker fleet and move the Hercs, A400M and C-17’s. I mean it was the Southern diversionary airfield and multiple runways make it better for the task than Brize xD

    in reply to: Wildcat, More Exports? #2007033
    giganick1
    Participant

    What about the Battlefield version, what actual others are of the same sort of size, S-70 and NH90 are both a lot larger (and NH90 TTH has meant to have some major faults)

    in reply to: Impressive Weapons Load 2 (again) #2260978
    giganick1
    Participant

    I had a book with a chapter about the beer carrying, I will see if I can dig it out. I think it was only for officers IRRC

    in reply to: What have I just seen? #2260986
    giganick1
    Participant

    I pity the Gripen pilots; a six-hour drag across the Atlantic with only soggy cheese sandwiches for lunch and a bag into which to pee.

    Meanwhile the tanker crew are stretching-out and kicking-back.

    Their fault for flying fast jets not heavy’s :D:diablo:

    in reply to: An Alternative Falkland Scenario #2260990
    giganick1
    Participant

    What I meant was that to the the Voyagers their “own” Typhoons would naturally serve as deterrence for Argentinian long range fighters where lone C-17s would never have such level of “natural” air defense. 🙂 So the realities of both types of flights are significantly different requiring a totally different planning logic.

    Forgive me Nick for thinking that your above reasoning seems rather “simplistic”… Jet fuel for once will be a very rare commodity over there, ,how large are The Falkland’s air base reserves for fuel and how long would they last once the full complement of Typhoons starts flying heavily? After that this initial fuel will have to be replaced by ship from the UK How long would it take to do so? Wouldn’t these fuel tank farms be natural first day of war targets for hypothetical Argentinian Special Forces? Much more than the local fighter planes themselves…

    Comments?

    Hammer

    Yes you would need more tankers but if we used that link as a rule of thumb you can do the maths.

    I would have thought that the C-17’s would have been in the same packages as the Tiffies so that would be their protection.

    I can assure you that we would have enough fuel down there for a fair period. I don’t think that any Arg special forces would be able to take the farms as they are probably within the defended perimeter and there are bound to be motion detectors etc.

    I really don’t think that Argentina would be able to take the Falklands before we would be able to step up the defenses to a good enough standard….

    Regards

    Nick

    in reply to: An Alternative Falkland Scenario #2261264
    giganick1
    Participant

    1 – http://en.mercopress.com/2009/10/23/typhoons-were-flown-non-stop-to-the-falklands-with-support-from-ten-aircraf

    2 – Fly as close to friendly soil as possible and eject

    3 – Chile has always been the diversion, even if they had to fight there way past some hostile aircraft

    4 – Of course, mroe redundancy and more fuel capacity

    5 – Probably 4 Meteor/AMRAAM and 4 ASRAAM

    6 – They would fight there way in, they would have to make it for any chance of success

    7 – I don’t know what you mean, It would be used to transport ground forces as the Voyegers would support the Tiffies

    ———-

    When you think of it we would have 30 Aircraft down their after 24 hours, only 12 less than 1982, and with better multi-role capability

    Also we would see the aircraft at full combat readiness on the way down, with a short stop at Ascension (Would we deploy a 2/3 aircraft flight to guard Ascension???).

    By the time this hypothetical war will happen we will have T3 coming online and possibly CFT’s?

    Regards

    Nick

    in reply to: UK Voyager fixes, delays to Meteor and problems with PGMs #2262812
    giganick1
    Participant

    Does anyone else think that Army projects are under represented, like ASCOD SV/FRES????

    in reply to: Scenario: Re-arming Argentina #2265255
    giganick1
    Participant

    I found this after browsing on another forum and thought I’d post it here for some of the narrow minded Argies

    People had a go at me a year or two back for calling them Argies as it is a derogitory term, I no longer use it due to this reason as I accepted I was wrong. I have recently read “Storming the Falklands – My War and After” and in fact an awful lot of what you call “Argies” are ashamed of 1982….I would volunteer to go south should they be invaded again but that would be a decision from the Argentinan government (And I do think their PM doesn’t have a clue about anything but lets not get into that) not the people, they may want them to be Argentinan but they are British and want to be so, I do think this is starting to get a bit much on this forum, there are so many new Falklands threads and things….

    Regards

    in reply to: South America market 2015-2035 #2266659
    giganick1
    Participant

    The Argentinian’s screwed up their chances of getting anything with a British designed component in 1982. I can’t see them getting anything in British technology until they have a government that gives up their claim on the Falklands and signs a legally binding treaty with the UK giving up their claim.

    But then again I would bet 1435 would take any Mirage aircraft and therefore would sleep fine if they got any 😉

    in reply to: X-32A vs X-35A again #2267957
    giganick1
    Participant

    It has to be STOL, not STOBAR, because LHDs cannot have catapults which are costly to install and operate.

    The entire point of STOBAR is that it doesn’t need Cats

    Short Take Off But Arrested Landing

    in reply to: QEC Construction #2007781
    giganick1
    Participant

    The actual airgroup is 40 PLUS, so forty is a normal load but a surge capability is there. What needs to be remembered is that these aren’t fleet carriers like the USNs carriers, they are attack carriers (CVA)

Viewing 15 posts - 91 through 105 (of 339 total)