dark light

Portagee

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 594 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Top Gun ===> 2 #2464161
    Portagee
    Participant

    I fear that this would have so much CGI they’d be as well making it a CGI/cartoon with Cruise voicing himself.

    in reply to: What, Where, When ? #1193274
    Portagee
    Participant

    Info on the Meteor (if I’ve read the serial correctly) can be found HERE including it’s current location, and possible locations for the image.

    in reply to: RAF Church Fenton #2470311
    Portagee
    Participant

    The latest Defence Estates review has it as a core site, and is secure up to 2030.

    Estates Review Story

    Estates Devolpment Plan Annex B contains Church Fentons information.

    in reply to: General Discussion #329989
    Portagee
    Participant

    Can someone tell me what a stratified sample is?

    This is a term I’ve never heard of and as such don’t consider it a fair question.

    Oh 17/20

    in reply to: Mathematics Test – Are You Brave Enough? #1906036
    Portagee
    Participant

    Can someone tell me what a stratified sample is?

    This is a term I’ve never heard of and as such don’t consider it a fair question.

    Oh 17/20

    in reply to: Heads Up Fairford BBC1 #1202862
    Portagee
    Participant

    From what I saw of it, the BBC suffered what you might call the usual problem of covering a flypast.

    Namely that the director didn’t “time” each aircraft/combination before cutting to the next in the stream. Also a little bit of lacking in spacial (spatial depending on your spelling) awareness of some aircraft appearing to be out of sequence, when in fact they weren’t. Resulting in showing some of the stream out of sequence which threw the on-screen timing off for the next section.

    Likewise during the WW1 segment after the flypast, not knowing what exactly was going on, resulted in missing the british aircraft being bounced by the German aircraft.

    I’m not intending this to be a Bash at the director, filming flypasts and mock engagements, can’t be easy at the best of times and if it’s not something that’s done regularly, it would be even more difficult.

    The one thing that it did do was show how much I missed the days of Raymond Baxter covering such events.

    Edit: excuse the same post in two threads, didn’t realise that this one was getting more attention. Perhaps they’ll get merged later

    in reply to: RAF flypast online heads up #1202868
    Portagee
    Participant

    From what I saw of it, the BBC suffered what you might call the usual problem of covering a flypast.

    Namely that the director didn’t “time” each aircraft/combination before cutting to the next in the stream. Also a little bit of lacking in spacial (spatial depending on your spelling) awareness of some aircraft appearing to be out of sequence, when in fact they weren’t. Resulting in showing some of the stream out of sequence which threw the on-screen timing off for the next section.

    Likewise during the WW1 segment after the flypast, not knowing what exactly was going on, resulted in missing the british aircraft being bounced by the German aircraft.

    I’m not intending this to be a Bash at the director, filming flypasts and mock engagements, can’t be easy at the best of times and if it’s not something that’s done regularly, it would be even more difficult.

    The one thing that it did do was show how much I missed the days of Raymond Baxter covering such events.

    in reply to: Vulcan Bomber Survivors in North America #1205125
    Portagee
    Participant

    XM573 as has been said is under cover at the Strategic Air and Space Museum in Nebraska.

    XM605 is in the open at Castle Air Museum in California, along with other aircraft

    XM606 is in the open at the Eighth Airforce Museum in Louisiana, along with other aircraft.

    XL361 is in the open sitting in the middle of Goose Bay Airport/airbase all on her lonesome.

    XM605, XM606 and XL361 are all clearly visable on Google Earth.

    in reply to: What airfield is this? #1209170
    Portagee
    Participant

    Anybody know what this airfield (12 miles NE of Stanstead) is called?

    http://maps.google.com/maps?ie=UTF8&ll=51.970077,0.495071&spn=0.186977,0.689392&t=k&z=11

    None of the surrounding places ring any bells.

    GoogleEarth identifies it as Wethersfield.

    Wiki says this about the former RAF Wethersfield

    in reply to: What airfield is this? #1209758
    Portagee
    Participant

    1st one is the former RAE airfield at Thurleigh, as mentioned earlier….:)

    Now partly used as Bedford Autodrome…a “Track day” circuit owned by Jonathon Palmer, former Racer and owner of Brands Hatch, Snetterton, Oulton Park and Cadwell Park circuits as well through his MSV Group.

    in reply to: Miss Demeanour #1209788
    Portagee
    Participant

    She’s listed as appearing at East Fortune later this month.
    This has become a regular appearence for her.

    in reply to: CVF #2075616
    Portagee
    Participant

    Scottish perspective from BBC plus piccy of large dry dock being refurbished.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/edinburgh_and_east/7483942.stm

    How will the Scottish nationalists spin this good or bad ?

    There is only one way to spin this…Good for Scotland and it’s workforce.

    Even if a successful Indendance vote occured during the build phase it would be pretty much irrelevant to the CVFs.
    There would be a divorce period during which the mechanism of power are separated and new ones are grown.
    Work would likely be completed or beyond the point of moving it elsewhere … at huge expense and time-line delay.
    And besides why shouldn’t shipyards in an Independant Scotland not build Ships for other countries?

    in reply to: Hercules add on ? #2478500
    Portagee
    Participant

    Its an ECM/IR defensive turret.

    I can’t remember the exact designation though I’m sure someone will be along shortly with it.

    in reply to: Airbus A.400M Roll-out at Sevilla #2482498
    Portagee
    Participant

    Something doesn’t look quite right to my eye

    The Main landing gear fairings are huge and look really far back. The rear of them looks to actually go under the doors on either side of the rear fuselage.

    Almost as if it’s a shortened version rather than a standard size, as Arthur suggests above …Fuselage Plug anyone?

    in reply to: CVF #2075896
    Portagee
    Participant

    How would that work, exactly? Haven’t the soldiers sworn an oath to the Queen? What would England have to gain by giving up the Scottish regiment, or any military resources, for that matter?

    I’m Scottish but you can be sure that if I was in the armed forces I would not be happy about being handed over to some other country.

    To deal with your last paragraph first…Scottish regiments are predominantly recruited by area of Scotland, though I’m sure there are Non-scots serving in the Scottish regiments. As such their allegaince would switch from the UK to Scotland, and for most that wouldn’t be a problem.
    There would be the option I’m sure for those who wished to transfer to a Non-Scottish Regiment, likewise Scots serving outwith Scottish Regiments to become part of a Scottish force.
    Similarly Scots in the Navy and RAF would have the option of transfering to a Scots naval or Air force by whatever names they may ultimately end up with.

    From the first paragraph, that England would gain at all is arguable in some camps. Indeed it’s a real possibility that Scottish independance would actually cost the English (and those from Wales and Northern Ireland assuming that a new union is formed) tax payer quite a bit, not least the cost of having to establish a new Nuclear Submarine base since Scotland by SNP policy would be have no Nuclear weapons.
    Westminster would also face the possible costs of replacing if it felt it was required, the equipment that had been negociated as belonging to Scotland (by percentage of Scots tax payers money).
    This could include a number of any type of aircraft currently or ordered in high numbers, likewise proportionate numbers of Naval ships.
    But as I said above this would be open to negociation since a percentage of a CVF (to bring this back somewhere near topic) would be of no use to Scotland and a CVF minus Scotland’s share wouldn’t float very well.

Viewing 15 posts - 436 through 450 (of 594 total)