dark light

F-18 Hamburger

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 1,934 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Mig-31 versus F-22 #2606085
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    …. now, with the coimg in of stealth, the noise which was earlier filterd out by the radar, might get some more attention in the future and the ‘specific character’ flys might get priority when filtering in ….. which will allow to track the unusual flys in the air … but that means more processing, but its not impossible …

    we’re talking about something else.

    in reply to: Mig-31 versus F-22 #2606093
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    There are plenty of ground based radar that can detect insect sized targets, most are rejected from the display as clutter however as up until stealth aircraft became viable tracking insects wasn’t one of the roles invisiaged for air defence radars. Most long wave Russian air defence radars could be used to track insects flying at mach 1.5 at 40,000ft however. Unlike at ground level over siberia there won’t be billions of them flying around. Using IRST and GCI I see no reason why a Mig-31 pilot would be wondering where the F-22 is. The Mig-31 pilot also has the weapons to reach out and touch an F-22, unlike the F-22.

    yes.. the MiG-31 has a ground based radar inside of it.. :rolleyes:

    in reply to: J-10 and the Israeli Connection (once more!) #2606640
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    The change comes from so many unanswered and perplexing details about the plane.

    For example, why discard the wingtip rails for missiles like in the F-16 and Lavi and choose rounded wing tips instead?

    Why the M2000 style fuselage hardpoint layout?

    Why choose a shallower canopy, better for streamlining, but bad for visibility, over the bubble canopies of the F-16/Lavi? If the plane is optimized for subsonic aircombat, you don’t need a shallower canopy.

    A more direct Lavi model and connection would have answered my questions and give me a much clearer picture of the J-10’s capability and performance parameters. But no longer. I am no closer to that answer as I was a few years ago.

    I have learned that what the rest of the world thinks is of no consequence when they’re plain wrong pure and simple. The rest of the world thought that the plane would have Russian radar, be able to fire Russian AAMs like R-27s, R-77s and R-73s.

    Up to now, we have seen hordes of pics of the J-10, many with missiles—and none of them has a Russian AAM.

    thanks for answering a question that I didn’t ask. I’m talking about the extent of Israeli input on the Lavi.

    in reply to: J-10 and the Israeli Connection (once more!) #2606957
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    Pretty much my opinion changed after much analysis of the plane, as my knowledge comes greater in depth and as much more data becomes clear. There is just way too many differences, too many inconsistencies, too many changes, too many questions…

    sounds fair enough for your change in point of views, although I’m more interested in your change of thoughts of US/Israeli input on the Lavi rather than this J-10 deal :diablo:

    in reply to: General Discussion #392756
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    I don’t understand you brits.. after all that arguing over Blair, he’s still favored by most of the people.. is it that no one is better or do you all represent nothing more than a vocal minority with a hamburger fetish.

    in reply to: European Parliament #1952702
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    I don’t understand you brits.. after all that arguing over Blair, he’s still favored by most of the people.. is it that no one is better or do you all represent nothing more than a vocal minority with a hamburger fetish.

    in reply to: J-10 and the Israeli Connection (once more!) #2606983
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    There is no mincing on the words. I don’t think the Israelis contributed anything to the J-10 airframe at all. In fact I don’t even think they got much contribution to their own Lavi airframe at all.

    big change from

    I would find it quite a stretch that using the AL31F and with structural changes for that engine would cause the a fighter based on the Lavi at 7,000kg, to add another 1,400kg to 8,400kg. In comparison to previous Chinese fighters, the J10A is being speculated to be using composites heavily (just as the Lavi), and that technology has been acquired from the West.

    How much the J10 is derived from the Lavi is subject to speculation. Israel has been selling arms and technology to the Chinese for years, and you can point to the PL8 AAM which is based on the Python 3, and the laser technology used on the Laser Defense System on the T98 tanks. Given that the Lavi was a great financial burden to the Israelis, there is an obvious financial benefit of selling the tech to China. There is the political motivation as well—the Israelis were not happy about its cancellation, and the fact that the US is also selling to the Arabs, especially F16s. (While the Israelis will be getting a latest customized variant, the F16I, the UAE is getting the Block 60.)

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=32629&highlight=Lavi#post32629

    Oh yeah, that’s the J10, from a leaked photo in a Chinese magazine….The similarity to the Israeli Lavi is quite apparent. Considering that the Lavi was partly developed with F16 technology, the US is quite concerned that the Israelis may have passed Lavi technology to the Chinese. Both governments deny this. (This is not the only delta-canard the Chinese attempted; they had a Viggen like J9 project that was cancelled in favor of the J8.) However such denials are thinly veiled, since the Chinese is known to be making an AAM called PL8 that looks very much like an Israeli Python 3. “

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=35271&highlight=Lavi#post35271

    Advanced digital avionics were reportedly to be supplied by Israel from its canceled Lavi advanced fighter program, and Pakistani interest was reaffirmed in February 1998 by a formal letter of intent signed in Beijing, which included agreement to share the project development costs.

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?p=28217&highlight=Lavi#post28217

    While of course, your opinion is likely to change after more information was released, your opinion over Israeli development of their Lavi was much different than now as there is no excuse since the Lavi program was as well known now as it was then.

    in reply to: JF-17 Cockpit #2607000
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    hud looks incredibly miniscule and does not match the diagram, k bye

    in reply to: Ace Combat 5 #237561
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    Do you guys have any preferance of aircraft? i like the whole squadron to have the same aircraft so i usually have four F-35C’s for the more air to ground missions and the F/A-22A’s for the more air to air missions.

    That’s not to say i don’t like mix and matching, i also mainly use the F-14A, MIG-31, MIG-1.44, the Hawk is also quite a nippy little aircraft 😀 BTW keep it on the PS2!

    That’s a real tough one because there’s soo much aircraft to choose from that I can’t stick to just one, knowing that there’s so many to choose from. It’s only in those naval carrier stages do they limit some of your choices.. Which of course I choose usually two Rafales and two F-14s.

    Other aircraft that I seem to use more often than others..
    MiG-21 93 (pretty powerful for such a low end aircraft, but it’s 2nd armament sucks)
    MiG-31 for air to air missions
    Rafale for anti ship missions
    F-16b60 for missions that require both
    and the X-02

    aircraft I really hated
    Gripen – I like the aircraft, but they gave it such shoddy secondary weapons.. those rockets! out of all the real life armaments the Gripen can use, they chose that.

    anything with the “stronger missile” thing.. basically a missile that does twice as much damage.

    Tornado ECR.. nuff said

    in reply to: A name for the F-35 JSF? #2607575
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    Stardonkey still sounds the best to me, it continues the ¨star¨legacy of Lockheed.

    in reply to: IAF- news & discussions- MAY 2005 #2607627
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    http://www.tribuneindia.com/2005/20050505/main8.htm

    haha exclusive marketing rights to the region? I’m sure they’ll sell plenty to Pakistan and Bangladesh.

    in reply to: A name for the F-35 JSF? #2607690
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    Lockheed should name its aircraft after other lockheed brands

    F-35C Ventura II

    the air force version should continue the star series of aircraft “i.e Starfighter, shooting star, Seastar, etc”

    Thus

    F-35A = Stardonkey

    in reply to: J-10 and the Israeli Connection (once more!) #2607714
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    This discussion again?? Personally I don’t know why it seems to “offend” people like plawolf and crobato when people are of the opinion that the J-10 at least partially has the Lavi to thank for its existence.

    hah too late, it already offended some one as you look at one of your post below. Furthermore, it seems that my Denial the cow image offended one person who I normally do not talk to, and has began engaging me in other threads 😀 looks like the cow has struck some very hard. well, after all this seems to boil down more to nationalistic pride rather than anything technical at all.

    http://webs.wichita.edu/mschneegurt/biol103/lecture16/cow_joke.jpg

    in reply to: Invasion of Venezuela? #2607716
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    I’ve said all along that we need to cut a deal with Putin and jointly exploit Siberia. And drill all over Alaska too, moose be damned. We get about half our oil from OPEC countries. We should work to move that as close to 100% as possible, and launch an economic campaign to devastate the members of OPEC. Economic warfare can be very amusing if it’s done right, and then lets see what the price of oil is. I paid $2.15/gallon the other day; in 1999 I could get gas for $0.69/gallon.

    I don’t know why I didn’t catch this, but I have to disagree with you here.
    Politically Putin moves against US interests, while Bush and Putin may be buddy buddy, the rest of the administration has enough forsight to support ex-Soviet republics into the pro-Western camp (i.e Ukraine, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan) which has brought up the issue of devolution in the Russian Federation again. Putin has been and always has been quite active in foreign policies that try to re-extend Moscow’s influence which are often against US interests (which is a good thing for the Russians, but not for American interests and the interest of some neighbors).

    Furthermore, as one whose ancestery hails from one of the many Siberian minorities, Soviet and Russian expeditions into Siberia are very inefficient. I find that American oil companies, while not being angels themselves, hold much more social responsibility and are much more efficient and cleaner in their workings. The Russian companies on the other hand have always been messy, sloppy and inefficient. Despite claims of being able to drill in near polar conditions, they are not that good. Keep in mind that Siberian oil will never replace the quality of Gulf oil.. Siberian oil involves drilling through layer upon layer of permafrost, and then transporting the sulfuric oil out via shaky infrastructure that usually doesn’t exist (most of the Soviet Era infrastructure is in the southern half of the country, i.e trans-Siberian). Also the harsh conditions often reduce the life of pipelines, which are often leaking, as well as requiring expensive labor. People are less productive in the cold.

    Also, unlike Alaska, there ain’t just moose in these regions. There are alot of people who rely on the land on subsistence livelyhood i.e Komi’s, Nenets, Khants, etc. Because of the damage and lack of a future there, its why we moved to Norway.

    Now as for an alternative, you should simply look to the Turkic World.. which includes Turkey, all of the ~Stans (except Pakistan, Tajikstan, and Afghanistan, as they are non Turkic).. and if the US supports devolution.. Western China, Turkic republics in the Russian volga region, and a large one in the Russian Far East. These regions hold tremendous resources, especially energy.. and have been traditional enemies of Persians, Russians and the Chinese. One can’t help but wonder that they’d make the perfect ally for the Americans.

    in reply to: Ace Combat 5 #237571
    F-18 Hamburger
    Participant

    hehe so is this it..

    OSEA = US
    Yuktobania = Russia
    Belka = Nazi Germany :p

    It doesn’t help that Belka has German style castles on their territory and the Prime Minister of Yuktobania speaks with a Russian accent 😎

    I’ve got to admit, while the story shows where it is obviously influenced.. it is much better than the stories of all the other Ace Combats

Viewing 15 posts - 556 through 570 (of 1,934 total)