The MiG-25s central fuselage is one massive welded steel construction, where ‘fit’ doesn’t really apply. It’s nose is relatively crude, but then all MiG-25s i’ve seen up close had spent over a decade in the open air with some tarps on them at best.

As i’ve said a dozen times before, making judgement on how aircraft look just by their finish is absolute rubbish. Age, paint, maintenance all make a far bigger contribution to the state of an aircraft than you think. There are plenty of museum aircraft with a far better ‘fit’ than those very same aircraft ever had when in operational service.

were you short enough to stand in the intakes?

you could at least shrink it.
It looks like a JH-7

Harryyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

🙂

you mention about the build quality, could you go into clarifications.

Tom of ACIG stated that in general, Russian aircrafts are bolted “simply” and that some natural factors (ie. wind, etc) can seep into the small cracks and gaps from the simpler build and eventually wear down the life time of the aircraft.. just wanted to see if you share this opinion.

I have no desire to be anything like that tw*t or any other footballer.
As far as I’m concerned I’d have the lot of them driven out into the fields to work as peasants.
Those of them that survived the first Winter would be allowed, at the discretion of a specially formed committee to be rehabilitated in schools opened especially for the backward.
However, not many would get past the members of the committee as Moggy will be chairman and if he won’t take the job, DH Fan.

Tomorrow we move onto the re-introduction of birching and public execution.

I’m pig sick of w*nkers like Beckham and those complete ***ts who play for Newcastle being held up as heroes.
You could shoot the lot of them for all I care.
Andy.

well why didn’t you just say so in the first place 🙂

Yes, it’s a stupid game.
Load of overpaid nancy boys.

don’t you wish you were a nancyboy or just boy, maybe even boy george :rolleyes:

sorry i should’ve made more clarifications