dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,551 through 2,565 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Polish parts for F-14 up[grades? What the f!@k? #2620407
    Arthur
    Participant

    Can’t argue with you there, Erez.

    in reply to: Polish parts for F-14 up[grades? What the f!@k? #2620421
    Arthur
    Participant

    Grumman’s F-14 tooling was destroyed by a certain current vice president, so they are no longer in the business. The USN has some capabilities of it’s own at it’s rework facility on North Island, but apart from that…

    in reply to: Your best shots of the F16 #2620434
    Arthur
    Participant

    Yep, somehow that always happens when an F-16 thread erupts around here… Did i mention the F-16s landing gear?

    in reply to: Polish parts for F-14 up[grades? What the f!@k? #2620454
    Arthur
    Participant

    Swidnik does build structural parts – i wouldn’t be surprised that an F-14 upgrade does entail some structural work. And about Israeli avionics – why not? It wouldn’t be the first time that Israel lends a hand to the Ayatollah’s air force 😉

    in reply to: Your best shots of the F16 #2620487
    Arthur
    Participant

    Bunch of dreamers… Lawndarts will be Lawndarts, even when some Lawndarts really try to be less boring.

    People here will know there is a lot more where this one came from. It’s 79-0377 doing what it does best. It later got rebuilt, had another accident, got rebuilt again (don’t people ever learn) and is now flying with the IDF/AF. Three strike, out?

    in reply to: That FB-22 thing … #2620494
    Arthur
    Participant

    So true… and a great analogy you have there.

    in reply to: Polish parts for F-14 up[grades? What the f!@k? #2620497
    Arthur
    Participant

    No it doesn’t necessarily say that it is for American Tomcats. The original Polish text could possibly clarify it, but “US F-14 Tomcat fighter planes” could just as well mean “US made F-14 Tomcat fighter planes.”. It’s not that Swidnik is above doing business with more or less obscure countries: they did deliver W-3 Sokols to Myanmar and Mi-2s to North Korea before (and i’m not talking about the Communist era, but afterward).

    Another option i can think of would be for a QF-14 program, but i personally think that one is even further fetched. Not only is there no such program that i am aware of, but also because there is a whole bunch of other companies which are more likely for such a contract.

    And probably even further fetched is that the US really loves wasting money, like on totally useless offset deals. Or wait – no, that actually sounds perfectly well possible :rolleyes:

    in reply to: FLANKER users #2620500
    Arthur
    Participant

    On a related note, will the tourgroup take care of all the stuff we need to get into Monino? Aren’t some sort of “permissions” required?

    A tuesday evening, in the election-summer of 1996, at the gate to the Monino museum. A car stops, just your average dirty Lada. Only the better trained observers might notice the Dutch license plate, but even those will be comforted by the smelly, unshaven drunk guy who stumbles out. Allright, he’s a bit tall, but he looks definately vague enough to seem Russian.

    Inside the guard house the sentry is reassured, even when the drunkard stumbles in. His accent is funny though – but not as bad as his grammar, let alone his vocabulary which sounds like that of a three year old.
    “Zdravstvuyte, mister comrade,” the drunk says. “I would like to visit your fine museum with my travelling comrade on Thursday.”
    The guard is surprised, and slightly amused by this sudden break in his boredom.
    “But we are closed on Thursday, because of our upcoming elections.”
    In true alcoholic fashion, the unexpected visitor tries to ignore this bit of information.
    “I don’t understand, i speak very bad Russian,” he replies. “I’m from the Netherlands, you see? Hips. I would love to see your beautiful aircraft on Thursday. That would be really nice, you know. I want to see aircraft from Russia. On Thursday.”
    A smile appears on the guard’s face. “We are closed on Thursday, there will be nobody here working. Let try to find someone who will be here in two days, and guide you around. Not working.” His smile broadens, comforting the drunk who has hardly understood one bit of what the guard just said.
    It takes only a short telephone call before the sentry has gotten what it takes to get rid of that strange visitor, and return to a nice and quiet evening of guarding that gate.
    “Khorosho, comrade” he says. “There will be someone here for you on Thursday, nine thirty. Will see you then, and good evening!”

    The visit itself, two days later, was just as great. The guide who walked us through the museum had been a navigator aboard an IL-4 during the Great Patriotic War, and spoke such a calm, gentle and clear Russian that i had no problem understanding him. Absolutely lovely museum – both for the collection, and for the people working (or not 😉 ) there.

    in reply to: Polish parts for F-14 up[grades? What the f!@k? #2620509
    Arthur
    Participant

    Euhhh… i’m being speculative here, but it doesn’t say anywhere that those parts will be for USN Tomcats… Cool! 😀

    in reply to: Aircraft with the same 'pet' name #1354106
    Arthur
    Participant

    ‘Snoopy’ was of course populair, with XV208 (the Meteo Herk) and one of the B-58 proto- or development aircraft having that name, as well as countless FAC aircraft in Vietnam.

    Then there is the series of Memphis Belles. Number I being of course that B-17, number II being an F-105D, number III appeared on an A-10 and at least two B-52s, and now Memphis Belle IV is both an F-15E and another B-52.

    in reply to: Predictions for the 2005 #2620598
    Arthur
    Participant

    Well, you might start adoring another plane cause the Phantom is antique

    Antique? Now there is a change in your attitude…

    I’ll think about that when the last Rhino’s have hit the boneyard which will be quite some time I hate to tell you.

    Nope, the 20FS has disbanded. The last Phantoms have arrived.

    Perhaps I should begin to adore the FC-1 or the J-10? Lol. I guess I have to learn more about the latter and take the former pretty seriously (not likely to happen anytime soon) before I can do that now don’t I?

    Learning about other aircraft, taking other aircraft seriously… actually, that might improve your contributionary value to this board a lot 😉

    in reply to: MAKS 2005 Info #2620603
    Arthur
    Participant

    Are you sure the poor Colonel Pavlov would be able to handle all five of us? I doubt he’ll be making it to General then…

    in reply to: General Discussion #387798
    Arthur
    Participant

    He’s been spotted working in a McDonalds on the Southern Peninsula

    I thought he was working AS a McDonalds by now?

    in reply to: Second F-16I squadron #2621036
    Arthur
    Participant

    the cfts are probably mostly composite…….so the RCS is probably a non-issue.

    Depends on the sort of composites. Glass fibre should be completely clear to radar, but carbon or boron fibres certainly aren’t. My guess is the gun gas vent in the left CFT would be metal too, so that should definately be a reflector. Especially if you look at the nice 90deg angles.

    in reply to: Predictions for the 2005 #2621044
    Arthur
    Participant

    …and boeing will realize that the 7e7 is too small

    A problem they will try to avoid by forcing it onto the USAF as a KC-135 replacement, and onto the Navy as an F/A-18Ewww/F’ck replacement :diablo:

Viewing 15 posts - 2,551 through 2,565 (of 6,424 total)