dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: What is the feasibility of the X-29 as a cheap aircraft #2625236
    Arthur
    Participant

    FSW are a very large solution to a relatively small problem, and that very large solution brings problems of it’s own again. Don’t forget that none of the FSW aircraft built until today (except for marginally swept Blanik gliders and the handful HFB320 bizjets) was actually flown for a somewhat realistic lifespan. Especially if you consider that at high speeds, FSW will suffer a lot more strain than any other sort of wing.

    Anyone who has seen the Su-47 fly must agree that the thing is wobbly like hell – don’t know if the same was true for the X-29, but it didn’t give me a lot of faith in the whole idea of FSW.

    There were lots of F-16 systems put in the X-29 though. Landing gear, seat, cockpit, part of the FCS and quite a bit of other stuff.

    in reply to: STOVL Aircrafts #2625247
    Arthur
    Participant

    Glad they didnt choose the Boeing version of the JSF- the 32 whatchamacallit.
    It looks butt ugly.

    That’s character! And by far the more interesting design too – the one-piece machined upper fuselage/wing being just one of the engineering marvels of the thing.

    in reply to: the aviator #2625249
    Arthur
    Participant

    How does the movie deal with Hughes’ latest years of total lunacy? Apart from aviation, one of my other gazillion interests is psychotics and that definately applies to HH in his final years.

    in reply to: Myths of Aviation #2625256
    Arthur
    Participant

    Harry’s been waiting some time now to use the word ‘Balzac” in a sentence 😀

    It IS a great word. In Dutch, it translates as scrotum 😀

    in reply to: Russia's 2005 defense order- aviation #2625259
    Arthur
    Participant

    Is the Il-80 ‘Maxdome’ operational??

    Or has it been put out of service..

    Three operational at Chkalovskii: RA-86147, RA-86148 and RA-86149.

    Arthur
    Participant

    That YF-17 was painted in Canadian markings to promote the Northrop F-18L. By then the F-17 was already dead, but Northrop still had the rights to sell the true land-Hornet.

    in reply to: Indian Ocean Tidal Wave #2625879
    Arthur
    Participant

    Only Diego Garcia-based websites i can find still running are the Navy meteo site at https://207.133.112.31/ (doesn’t mention anything), and a wireless company (at http://www.cwnetdg.io/ but nothing interesting there either).

    Nothing on af.mil yet either.

    Arthur
    Participant

    Thanks TJ – let’s wrap it up by saying that ZE449 got maintenance serial 9017M for a while, first having flown some time for the RAE and being stored throughout the 1990s. With the RAE (i think it flew from Farnborough), it still was the SA330L as it was when operated by Argentina.

    Arthur
    Participant

    PII, the link of the Army Scooter worked, thanks for that. And you’re right, the USAF operates two L-39s as chaseplanes from Edwards. Those are bought on the civil market, but they are definately military now.

    The following Pucaras were eventually interned by the UK:
    A-515 -> ZD485
    A-533 -> ZD486
    A-549 -> ZD487
    A-522 -> 8768M
    A-528 -> 8769M
    A-517 -> G-BLRP

    There also was a Puma captured (PA-12, to ZE449, to 9017M) and a Chinook (AE520) which shortly flew for the Brits.

    in reply to: Parallel Universe Battle of Britain Film #1367837
    Arthur
    Participant

    A Japanese Anime?

    Where a poor, old-fashioned Hujji-kane aerodroid suffers from an inferiority complex against the far more modern Seppitufaji aerodroid, set against the background of a terrible onslaught against the evil Goerzilla-monster.

    Arthur
    Participant

    A Royal Marines A109 surely fits the thread…

    in reply to: Query->Tu-22M3 #2626464
    Arthur
    Participant

    well there were 268 built at Kazan and 100+150= 250 .. so my numbers cant be that off

    See what i posted above: 127 Backfire-Cs in Russian service, and 99 in storage there, so a total of 226 ‘existing’ Tu-22M3’s. That leaves 42 of them which are retired, crashed or scrapped. The biggest part of those 42 is obviously scrapped in Ukraine: Poltava, Priluki and Mikolajiv all have seen the bulk of their Tu-22M3s scrapped.

    All Tu-22M2s are retired, by the way. VVS machines already by 1995 or 1996, the AV-MF machines just before 2000.

    in reply to: Pakistan News and Discussion thread #2626660
    Arthur
    Participant

    Quit whining about moderation or lack thereof. If you think ‘your’ threads on country X are dealt with more strictly than ‘their’ threads on country Y, it might have something to do with the way things are expressed, rather than some percieved bias. You might be surprised how much more you can get away with as long as you know how to decently formulate it.

    If someone tries to prove a point by bringing in off-topic stuff, it’s perfectly logical when that off-topic itself gets debated. If you don’t want that to happen, don’t bring it up.

    Nitin and others, stop making generalising remarks. Adress your complaints to one person, not against a whole group (especially not if the only way to define that group is a nationality).

    So gentlemen, please behave.

    Arthur
    Participant

    Good one Vort.

    Here the US Army RA-3B.

    in reply to: Query->Tu-22M3 #2626825
    Arthur
    Participant

    GRRRR

    naval aviation has 150 of them

    long range aviation around 100

    hmmz.. i hope most survive.. they are just so sleek and i can just imagine a wave of them massacaring some carrier group 😀

    See the Sean;s Myths-thread, especially post #37 at http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showpost.php?p=549580&postcount=37
    Also, your numbers are way too high.

Viewing 15 posts - 2,581 through 2,595 (of 6,424 total)