The YF-17 pics also were in the “That aircraft never flew with that airforce”-thread, at http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=26971
You’re not the only one doubting this, and i think chances of this actually happening are in fact lower than in the early 1990s. Back then, competition was effectively between the design bureaus alone. Now the factories themselves are also trying to slag each other off (KnAAPO vs IAPO as a perfect example) making things more complicated.
While you’re absolutely right there Ivan, you can’t deny that even despite those overwhelming odds in favour of the Hornet during those combat ops, the only air-to-air loss the US has suffered since Vietnam was a Hornet.
So perhaps it’s combat disproven as well?
Now that’s a big missile launcher… hope you put it to good use Ren! 😀
Been a while again – ‘t was Shaun of the Dead. Absolutely brilliant, but possibly better if you combine it with something like Dawn of the Dead on a DVD couch night.
Welcome aboard Tomcat Terrtory… especially with an opening statement like that.
For those gullible enough to believe the low-maintenance slogans for the Subpar Hornet… guess which aircraft ranks third in the USN Cannibalisation Contest? Yep, it’s the brand new, maintenance free Subpar Hornet :rolleyes:
http://www.afa.org/magazine/march2002/0302cannibal.pdf
The F/A-18C/D will probably be a lot cheaper though. That’s what happens with second-hand stuff.
Lovely – almost as lovely as a proper Wessex, but not quite.
This one has pistons… it actually sounds a whole lot better!
It’s D-HAUG, should be a former SABENA S-58C.
Interesting detail: the badge you can see on the wreck isn’t yet there at the rollout at Bacau. It did have it when i saw it, so it did fly with the badge (not that they brightened up an already crashed aircraft).
Do you have any upgraded MiG-21s? I have been looking for pix of Israeli upgraded Fishbeds for ages with little luck apart from this Ugandan Sparka and a couple of Ethiopian MiG-21’s but those were only overhauled in Israel not upgraded.
Unfortunately, no. I do know IAI has allowed a number of tours through their facilities, but they didn’t allow photographing or even writing down numbers…
Belarus’ L39s are really rare. They only got a handful with their Su-25 regiments (those units in Soviet days always used to have have a flight of Albatrosses for FAC and hack duties), there was no training regiment in Belarus whatsoever. Apart from the interesting paintjob on the L39 (looks like a high-gloss Hind scheme), it also seems to have an interesting badge on the tail.
Is there any connection between the size of generals’ hats and the unpleasantness of the country, btw? Those Belarussian officers really have North Korean proportions… 🙂
Numnuts McNamara did the same thing when the F-12B was cancelled. All SR-71/F-12/A-12 production tooling was ordered to be destroyed.
Somehow it’s only the really interesting aircraft to which that happens: both the TSR.2 and the Sukhoi T4 got their tooling destroyed when those projects were cancelled. Politicians… 😡
Yeah, let’s do this one again!
http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/showthread.php?t=24322&highlight=stavatti
During the hearing on to sell Pakistan F-16, a document was presented to House Select Committee on Foreign Affairs, in which the year, month, the day, and the hour of departure & arrival including the PAF C-130 aircraft serial number and the serial number of AIM-9B included were the names of the flight crew and the flight plan was presented on the table in which Pakistan had illegally transfared to PRC in 1967, which was later reversed engineerd into the Chinese PL-5 AAM.
Ah yes, those mythical PAF Herk-spotters. Probably just as mythical as the Pak AIM-9B -> China -> PL-5 link, as the PRC in 1967 already had their hands on a former Taiwanese AIM-9B that got stuck (unexploded) in the tail of a J-5.