Oh, XZ998 at Hermeskeil (pic in the other thread of course) is a former Brüggen instructional airframe.
Google is your friend.
http://www.egyptdailynews.com/My%20Webs/edailypics/airforce/tu16%5D.jpg
(with a nicely ripped OrBat from Scramble on the site too)
http://rus.air.ru/russpower/egypt/Tu-16eg.htm
http://www.super70s.com/Super70s/Tech/Aviation/Aircraft/images/Tu-16(DF…
http://www.bearcraft-online.com/museum/photos/b.77.4.jpg
(this is actually a Soviet Tu-16R operating in Egyptian markings, it never was an actual Egyptian machine)
A225HVY,
There were several Harriers at Laarbruch (as there were some five in the early 90s at Brüggen) but nothing is left at the former RAFG bases. Most of the aircraft were scrapped there, some were brought back to the UK.
The AV-8A fleet was largely cannibalised to keep the gap-filling AV-8C (upgraded AV-8A’s used while waiting for AV-8B’s) flying, and i seriously doubt if a lot of spares can still be scavaged from whatever early Harriers there are left in the UK.
No need to apologise. Standing corrected will do 😉
:diablo:
Why not think first? When a ballistic missile is fired against an target (airbase), what kind of warhead is to exspect for a military commander, when it shows up on an EW-satellite? Ballastic missiles still have a CEP, which makes that useless against a limited target with an ordinary warhead. To hit a single HAS with it, you have to fire dozens of that and may still miss. And free by this to be attacked by similar much more effective US -weapons. 😡
Well, last time i checked there were no HAS’es at Langley. Just go pre-emptive, after all those Weapons of Air Dominance might eventually be used against you :diablo:
I never knew Hitler was psychic. How could he ever admire a US president who only got to the White House 30 years after his death?
Greece still operates Phantoms too.
And don’t forget Albania’s MiG-15UTIs, and Chinese-built MiG-17s and -19s (J-5 and J-6 respectively). I don’t think their J-7s are still flying, but then again the Czechs, Romanians and Bulgarians do continue to fly those.
PS – I remember seeing a small photo taken at GLITS a few years back and published in AFM (IIRC) – in the background you could just make out the An-74R.
You’re not the only one remembering those Akhtubinsk pics. I believe they were taken by some people on one of those ‘Swiss’ tours. Funny thing was that of all the photos published, the background was usually the most interesting. A pic on the Scramble cover of the same tour (i believe that one was by Eugene Gadet) showed the tail of a Tu-22M3R in the background…
And thanks for the heads-up on Izdeliye 88 – if you could please pass that on to Andrei Fomin 😉
Which issue?
-SK
N1, 2001. It has some 30 pages of flatnose-Floggers, and i have yet to see something as in-depth as that article. You can order it at places like http://www.aviapress.com (check http://www.aviapress.com/viewonekit.htm?MAV-200101 ), or send Flex a private message and ask if he can forward you what i forwarded him – can’t do so myself because my own decent connection is hybernating.
Euhhh… those are USAF F-16s, not German ones. :rolleyes:
Actually, not all wet-feet-Frogfeet are Su-25UTG. There originally were only ten built, which were split up evenly between the Ukraine and Russia during the breakup of the Soviet Union. As the Russians had lost two in the first few years, they needed replenishment. These new aircraft were appearantly rebuild Su-25UBs and should be designated Su-25UBP. I’m not entirely sure if the wing was part of the modification either, but if it wasn’t you should be able to tell the difference between an UBP and an UTG by the leading edge: a dogtooth for the UBP, a double kink on the UTG.
Those MiG-27 aboard NITKA pics are from the excellent Mir Aviatsii article on the MiG-27, btw.
Sorry for the belated reply – but the pictures are EXTREMELY interesting, as far as i’m concerned. I actually never knew there was another aircraft besides SSSR-783573/39r, but then there is that gutted grey one…
And please don’t bicker on An-72R or An-74R, An-88 will do either way 😉
This one won’t be a tanker but a pure transport, so not a KDC-10 but a DC-10. It will be used to bring hagelslag, drop and the ingredients for wentelteefjes to all the Dutch troops abroad for the invaluable contributions to the New World Order and The War Against Terrorism.
Yes, definately.
I’m not all that honest, although i have a bit of everyday integrity. Will that do?
I am very dishonest. In fact, i’m seriously wondering if i really am honest right now.