dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 3,151 through 3,165 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Antonov An-124 #2657409
    Arthur
    Participant

    Google as a verb, not a nomen!

    As for the An-70, i thought it was on a dead-end but verbing you brought the following, from June this year, Rosbaltnews:

    http://www.rosbaltnews.com/2004/09/01/66807.html

    Russia, Ukraine to Build AN-70 Military Planes

    KIEV, June 7. Representatives of the Kiev aircraft factory Aviant and the Omsk manufacturing union Polet signed a two-year agreement to produce a series of AN-70 military transport planes. Aviant informed a Rosbalt correspondent that the planes will be assembled in Ukraine from Polet parts.

    Preliminary data shows that the overall number of planes needed between the two countries totals over 200. However, while Ukraine’s Defense Ministry has only ordered 5 planes thus far, India, the United Arab Emirates, China, and a few other Asiatic countries have already shown interest in the planes. ‘We have found a common denominator and defined a valuable policy with the Russian party. We look optimistically to the future,’ noted Aviant general director, Oleg Shevchenko.

    They still could use a few hundred orders or so, don’t forget the An-70 has been screwed immensely by Russia and mishaps over the last few years.

    in reply to: Photos of airplanes shot down by missiles (SAM or AAM) #2657441
    Arthur
    Participant

    It didn’t nosedive into the ground (like in most crashes), but landed flat on it’s belly with enough impact to turn it into a pancake.

    in reply to: Antonov An-124 #2657447
    Arthur
    Participant

    Oleg Antonov was born near Moscow, but (googlegooglegoogle…) his former deputy and replacement of General Designer of the OKB, Pyotr Balabuyev, is a homegrown Ukrainian. Still, the Russians can feel satisfied that at least they have got the An-124 production line at Ulyanovsk.

    in reply to: GREY BEARS #2657467
    Arthur
    Participant

    Here is the inventory of USA Air Inc. The MiG-29s have the basic grey low-viz paintscheme, it’s likely their previous operator used them in those markings.

    Apart from the Fulcrums, there are 9 L39s, two CJ-6es and a narrow-nose MiG-21 (can’t tell if it’s an F-13 or an U/US/UM) in the collection.

    in reply to: MiG-23/27 Flogger and MiG-25/31 #2657469
    Arthur
    Participant

    There are ~300 div. MiG-23s, 60 MiG-27 and 250 MiG-29/UB as tactical reserve, most are not in flying condition and will never be. RFAF (2004)
    41 MiG-25R in Moscow-Militärbezirk and 28 MiG-25 in St. Petersburg-Militärbezirk. Of this ~ 40 operated or in flying condition.

    Shatalovo and a handful at Lipetsk (Moscow MD) and Monchegorsk (Leningr… uhhh, St. Petersburg MD) airbases.

    Of the 256 MiG-31/M
    62 at Moscow-MB, 85 at St. Petersburg MB, 39 at Sibiria-MB and 26 Far-East-MB.
    Not all operated regulary, but some more at Test-facilities

    Moscow: Morshansk (doubtful though, hardly operational in 2001), Pravdinsk, Khotilovo (and Savasleyka at the Tsentr).
    St. P: Gromovo, Monchegorsk, Kotlas, Talagi.
    Siberia/Far East: a total of 65 is incredibly low if you consider the number of MiG-31 airbases that should be in this area: Yelizovo, Sandagou, Dolinsk, Omsk, Kansk, Bratsk and Bolshoye Savino. Now which ones have closed down as operational MiG-31 bases????

    in reply to: Agni II #2058133
    Arthur
    Participant

    Thread locked pending contemplation: cleanup or deletion.

    in reply to: Antonov An-124 #2657485
    Arthur
    Participant

    No – the Antonov An-225 is the Russian monster aircraft.

    I raise you in pickiness: it’s Ukrainian!

    From a spotters point of view, i have never seen such a huge aircraft which is so impossible to read. The wings are always in the way – impressive the dispersals of Seshcha may be.

    in reply to: Mystery Plane Quiz #1566049
    Arthur
    Participant

    I don’t think Sikorsky was in the US already during ww1.

    in reply to: I wonder how true this is. #2657806
    Arthur
    Participant

    I stand corrected Leornato, i wasn’t all too consciously alive back in 1980…

    in reply to: MiG-23/27 Flogger and MiG-25/31 #2658226
    Arthur
    Participant

    There is no question, the capabilities are given. Test-flown at Akhtubinsk or Lipetzk.
    But the shortage of money denied a modernisation program for Flogger, when there is not enough money to keep the Su-27 to “Export-level”. Most Floggers are retired or using-up the fkying-hours left.

    The Russians had retired all their Floggers by 1994, with a possible exception in an export-training regiment (for foreign pilots that is) at Stavropol which might have flown longer than that. But as the MiG-23-98 never was ment for the VVS, it definately has not flown tests at Akhtubinsk or Lipetsk. Akhtubinsk is the test base for ‘military’ testing (which the 23-98 certainly has not undergone, it was actually little more than an update proposal, and Lipetsk is the main in-service operational evaluation/operational test base in the VVS.

    If the 23-98 has undergone any serious testing whatsoever, it did so from Zhukovskii.

    in reply to: GREY BEARS #2658264
    Arthur
    Participant

    The pics show one of the Moldovan Fulcrums at the Nellis petting zoo where service personell can get up close and personal with Russian (and other potential hostile) gear. The green was the paint it had when it came from Moldavia, the grey paintjob is supposed to be a more authentic (and sometimes even claimed to be it’s) paintjob – well, at least they tried…

    in reply to: Why loose the F-1? #2658510
    Arthur
    Participant

    6000lbs (2722kg, Japan is a metric country 😉 ) is the maximum load for the F-1, against 10000 lbs (4536kg, even the UK is now metric while France always was) for the Jag.

    One of the main differences between the F-1 and the Jag is the much lighter and thinner wing for the Japanese plane. It doesn’t have internal wing tanks and is of a lighter construction, one of the ways to keep the weight of the T-2 (and subsequently F-1) down. Don’t forget it initially started out as the T-2 trainer with attack (officially) only an ‘afterthought’, and the whole airframe wasn’t changed when making the F-1. The two F-1 prototypes were actually converted T-2 prototypes.

    With only the anti-shipping task, a large payload for bomb-hauling missions like the Jag simply wasn’t necessary for the F-1, hence the far smaller payload. To be honest, it’s always been a rather pathetic aircraft for it’s size and price, especially when compared to the Jag. It took eight years after entering service (IOC of the F-1 was in april 1978) before this fighter actually got sidewinders added to it’s inventory.

    in reply to: GREY BEARS #2658518
    Arthur
    Participant

    Well, there definately are other MiG-29s in the US then the Moldovan ones, but none of the Moldovan machines are flying.

    Time to contact Tom again, should have done that a long time ago.

    in reply to: On the subject of Cuban MiGs #2658750
    Arthur
    Participant

    I know Dubya’s from Texas, i just thought Maine would be a more effective place to drop anti-Dubya agitprop 😉

    It is suggested that the BttR did engage in supplying weapons to anti-Castro groups in Cuba with their lightplanes. If that’s true (it’s only reported by the Cubans, somehow BttR itself doesn’t mention it) would you still hold your position on the shootdown?

    in reply to: On the subject of Cuban MiGs #2658760
    Arthur
    Participant

    John,
    The Cessna’s were illegally crossing Cuban borders with the ultimate intent to overthrow the Cuban government, by dropping propaganda. Furthermore, the Cessna’s were known to be owned by an organisation linked with terrorist organisations in Cuba proper.

    Best of all, the BttR had been violating Cuban airspace for a longer period of time and the Cuban government had warned them that future breaches of Cuban airspace could result in the DAAFAR opening fire on the intruders. They were warned, they ignored the warnings and flew in anyway, and they were shot down. Yes they were unarmed lightplanes, so what? I don’t recall any outrage when Israeli helicopters shot down a Cessna from Lebanon either.

    And i don’t think any hypothetical Iranian Yak-18T’s on leaflet dropping missions calling for an Islamic revolt against GWB over Maine would be left untouched either.

    I don’t think that font size seven is really convincing by the way, i prefer your arguments over your typographical shouting.

Viewing 15 posts - 3,151 through 3,165 (of 6,424 total)