Here is a link to the Dutch-German windtunnel, it’s at Marknesse (a sh!tty little settlement on mopped up seabed). Quite a few interesting pics in the gallery, including one of a hypersonic air-breathing vehicle.
http://www.dnw.aero/index.php
Originally posted by Steve Touchdown
Is the AIM-9X certified on the F-15K then?
It is on the -C, when going abroad for well-publicised exercises 😉
I think the whole deal with expanded weapons packages for American fighters is a bit of a moot point anyway. Over and over again, the US has shown quite a bit of reluctance to deliver the available weapons with an aircraft in order not to ‘destabilise the region’. With a bit of bad luck, you’ll be finding yourself flying F-15s with SCALP/Apaches (after paying a hefty integrating price of course) just because the US wouldn’t supply you with any of their stand-off systems. Even though the marketeers gladly pointed out those weapon options. I think we all can think of such cases in the past.
Originally posted by ELP
This is a funny photo everytime I see it…(snip)… I don’t know what this guy is doing unless it is a staged photo to make it look functional or just a bad time to snap the photo.
Definately staged, a marketing/PR pic from top to bottom. Much like the “EA-18G Growler” which Boeing put on the static of a number of high-key airshows (Andrews AFB, nice and close to the Pentagon and the policy makers). Make it look more than it is (yet), then you can get sales. The “F-15E Strike Eagle” made it’s first airshow appearance in 1980, just six years even before the first funds for Strike Eagles were allocated. The aircraft put on display was of course nothing more than the famous lizard-painted YF-15B, 71-0291.

Well, it would be hard to believe if Boeing’s domestical record was spotless. But it isn’t.
Needless to say, corruption goes a long way and European companies certainly aren’t above that. Belgium didn’t buy those Agusta 109s because of their qualities either.
Originally posted by crobato
Lol. KnAAPO cranked out the majority of nearly 700 Flankers between 1983, when serial production began up to 1989, with peak years around 85′ to ’88.And you’re right, SAC isn’t KnAAPO. SAC is much bigger, located in the center of Chinese industrial heartland, the former capital of Manchuria, while KnAAPO is in a small town of Siberian backwaters. KnAAPO still relies mostly on hand driven labor, commenting proudly about its only piece of automation is a pneumatic hand drill. SAC has benefited from modern investment, which includes precision machine tooling from Europe, the US, and Japan.
Before, and partly during, Su-27 production at Komsomolsk, this factory also churned out Su-17/20/22s by the hundreds, production of which was over 100 a year by the early 1980s. In addition to building Fitters and Flankers, they also took care of the massive Su-27 rework program of the as yet undelivered Flankers in the mid-1980s. It’s quite a big more than just a backwater town in the Siberian desolation with nothing more than just one pneumatic handdrill. For one, KnA is the biggest industrial centre along the Baikal-Amur Magistral railway. Apart from the aircraft plant, there are massive steelworks, it has huge shipyards (the Soviet icebreakers were all built there), and is the biggest pacific fish processing centre. Don’t underestimate the city – it’s nowhere near what it was back in Soviet days, but it’s definately not some backwater town as you say it is.
If anyone has a log of the Yuri Gagarin Aircraft Factory Museum, i would be happy of course 😉 http://www.travel2russia.com/destguide/komsom.htm
And great info guys, keep it up.
Well, they are Danish, and they were based at Karup. That was what made me think about an SJ deployment in the first place – back around 1990 when i got really involved into planespotting, it was fashionable here in the Netherlands to have a photo of something ‘special’ on your photo-suitcase. Somehow the SJ Phantoms were really populair (which is funny i think, there were much more interesting Phantom units and i always thought the A-7D deployments were much nicer until it was too late).
There’s nothing much more to tell from this picture i guess, except that it seems to be taken from yet another Recce-Draken.
Originally posted by vicky ten
She just looks so out of place where she is displayed, I think the arguaments about who deserved a Concorde have long since run their course, but displayed on a barge in a city???
New York has of course a reputation with airliners in the city centre… (we used to have a devil icon in the old forum, i really wish we had it again).
Definately 4TFW/SJ. Back in the 1980s, these visited Denmark almost annually. Since the fintip seems to be blue, it should be 334TFS, which makes this pic most likely taken during CORONET MARINER at Karup AB, from 29apr to 21may 1987.
See how wonderful Steve’s link is 😉 ?
Originally posted by Comet
That’s what I call justice. At least you have to agree, it is the only proven method of preventing re-offending! That thing will not kill any more children will it?
I think you’re hopelessly soft on criminals. Babies should all be drowned at birth, in order to prevent them from becoming criminals. If every kid who ever stole an apple was drowned (or hung, or smashed against a wall, or impaled) at birth, the world would be a better place indeed!
:rolleyes:
Originally posted by Comet
That’s what I call justice. At least you have to agree, it is the only proven method of preventing re-offending! That thing will not kill any more children will it?
I think you’re hopelessly soft on criminals. Babies should all be drowned at birth, in order to prevent them from becoming criminals. If every kid who ever stole an apple was drowned (or hung, or smashed against a wall, or impaled) at birth, the world would be a better place indeed!
:rolleyes:
Yep, the Fokker D.24, designed together with Republic, work starting in 1962. It was Fokker’s last fighter design, still with the old D-designation which was originally reserved for biplanes.
Here is a sideview of what seems the very same D-24 model, it shows the exhausts. The model used to be at the now closed Aviodome museum at Schiphol, but i haven’t seen it during my quick visit to the Aviodrome in Lelystad (which has taken over the Aviodome collection) a few weeks back, unfortunately. There is an interesting bit of info on it at http://www.aerofiles.com/repub-vfx.html
That’s the production variant of the Yak-36. The original Freehand had proven to be a perfectly funcioning VTOL aircraft, except maybe it’s payload, range and equipment were totally useless for a military aircraft. Nevertheless, the prototype was accepted for service so an initial batch of 12 Yak-36s were ordered.
The people at Yakovlev thought they could do better, and while the Yak-36 was still being test flown, they started designing something new. This was the Yak-36M, the aircraft now known as Yak-38 Forger. By the time this design was completed, it was shown to the AV-MF and aircraft production officials. These then ordered the Yak-36M to be developed, and cancelled the Yak-36 order, three of which were in various states of completion. After a good year in service, the Yak-36M was redesignated Yak-38.
Here is an image of what the Yak-36 was to look like.
Other European projects have continued to evolve as well. Alpha Jet was developed until the AJet III (which failed to get orders), the Atlantic’s development is still ongoing (ATL 3 now being on offer), Italy’s jet trainers, French helicopters, and i don’t think anyone can say that any Mirage variant hasn’t grown ever after entering service, even though it has to be said that the manufacturers are generally more active in developing upgrades than the countries are in buying those upgrades (the M2K-5 being a great example).
But no continued development by European products? Hardly. One could argue the US is even worse than this – all new F-15s offered are hardly more than the Strike Eagle concept of the early 1980s, and the C-130J only came about after some 30 years in which the C-130H was the pinnacle of modern tactical transport…
TsAGI at Zhukovskii has a reeeeally big one, in which a full-scale MiG-25 was appearantly tested at Mach 3. Western Europe has a few (no doubt Britain and France have big ones), one of the main ones surprisingly is in the perfectly boring Dutch Noord Oostpolder. The Lampyridae stealth fighter project was tested right there, for example.
Those rocket pods look big. Well, if you compare them with the ones hung under one of the IL-76 prototypes that is…