dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 4,531 through 4,545 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Whatever happened to Kamov's Ka-60 "Kasatka" #2691447
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by Shkval1
    [dreary mod on]
    Kasatka is “Hirundo rustled”, not “Hirundo daurlca”, not “Delichon urbica”, not “Riparia riparia”, not “Progne subis”, not other 120 species of swallows.

    Does it migrate to Africa, and if it does… does it bring coconuts?
    (couldn’t help).
    http://www.holygrailcastle.com/patsy.JPG

    in reply to: Underground hangars, reprise #2691675
    Arthur
    Participant

    GREAT pics, DJNik!

    in reply to: Whatever happened to Kamov's Ka-60 "Kasatka" #2691838
    Arthur
    Participant

    Me dumb!

    in reply to: Photo request and question #2691846
    Arthur
    Participant

    Ken,
    An email with corrections is underway.

    And since the Fitter is one of those regular topics here, i guess it’s a nice idea to get all Fitter variants together again, all Su-7/17/20/22 of them. First in the list is the Su-designation, then the Sxx design designator, and finally the ASCC designator. You’ll notice that these do not necessarily have anything to do with each other 😀

    Su-7………….S2.2-1……………………
    Su-7B………..S2.2-2………..FITTER A
    Su-7BM………S22M…………FITTER A
    Su-7BKL……..S22MKL……..FITTER A
    Su-7BMK…….S22MK……….FITTER A
    Su-7IG……….S22I………….FITTER B
    Su-17…………S32……………………….
    Su-17M……….S32M………..FITTER C
    Su-20…………S32MK……….FITTER C
    Su-20R……….S32MK……….FITTER C
    Su-17M-2…….S32M2………FITTER D
    Su-17UM……..S52U…………FITTER E
    ………………….S32M2D……..FITTER F
    Su-22………….S32M2K…….FITTER F
    Su-22A………..S32M2K…….FITTER F (only in Peru)
    Su-17UM-3…..S52UM3…….FITTER G
    Su-22UM-3…..S52UM3K…..FITTER G
    Su-17M-3…….S52…………..FITTER H
    Su-17M-3…….S52…………..FITTER J (as -H but with ventral fin)
    Su-22M……….S52K…………FITTER J
    Su-22M3……..S52M3K……..FITTER J
    Su-17M-4…….S54…………..FITTER K
    Su-22M-4…….S54K…………FITTER K

    More Fitter-fun at the hilarious thread from long ago: Su-17/20/22… Help!

    in reply to: Underground airfields in Serbia #2691910
    Arthur
    Participant

    They were first to the crash sites – so what? There was media coverage of both wrecks, the remains of them were published almost everywhere even vaguely related to military aviation.
    http://www.aeronautics.ru/img001/mig29bosnia6.jpg
    http://www.aeronautics.ru/mig29bosnia2.jpg
    Yes, imglinked from Venik 😀

    Steve,
    ever wondered why those dumb and inexperienced spotters at the other side of the airbase always have a totally different log than you on the very same day? Yes, it’s those lazy Dutch crewchiefs, every time yet another F-16 is shot down over Tajikistan or Serbia, they paint the serial of the crashed one on one side of the tail of another one. That way, both remain seen as operational aircraft…

    in reply to: Underground hangars, reprise #2691926
    Arthur
    Participant

    It’s actually a shame that Yugoslavia’s largest underground airbase is no longer in use, and is absolutely rotting away. Bihac-Zeljava was definately the largest one in Europe. Five runways (each 2,9 kilometres), four underground hangar complexes for a total of 80 MiG-21s…

    http://www.beath.co.nz/images/tunnel.jpg
    One of the normal entrances, not just suitable for the MiGs.

    Below the state of the taxiways in the fall of 2003. It doesn’t seem likely the base is about to re-enter service (in whatever role), there seem to be some border disputes in the area between Croatia and BiH, conveniently running across the base. Definately an interesting base.

    Edit: consider this an answer to Billy. The base cost appearantly ‘only’ six billion dollars to build. However, the experience gained from building Zeljava did get the Yugoslavs some profitable base-building contracts in Iraq.

    in reply to: Underground hangars, reprise #2691942
    Arthur
    Participant

    It wouldn’t surprise me if the US has built an amount of underground command and control bunkers in Afghanistan, but i seriously doubt anything directly related with aircraft is dug in. First of all, such underground facilities are of course hugely expensive to build. The dateline of the article being July2002 doesn’t make me believe there was enough time to build anything substantial underground.

    Also, an underground airbase is only really convenient (and IMHO worthwile) if you want to protect your assets deployed at that base from a large enemy attack. Neither seem likely for Herat: i don’t think the US will deploy a fighter wing so close to Iran, and most definately not without proper protection. Defensive, underground hangars are just not the US’ thing to do.

    That Chinese National Air Museum is the Datang Shan place, they have put something smaller in place of that Bull.

    And, to make this post a total hodgepodge, here’s an overview of Slatina airbase, showing the location of the underground hangar in relation to the rest of the base.
    http://www.jrv.skynow.co.uk/bases/slatina.gif

    in reply to: Underground airfields in Serbia #2691973
    Arthur
    Participant

    Paranoia, what a wonderful thing!

    An AGM-88 which ended up in Bulgaria was world news, but a downed F-18 or Phantom in Hungary would have been hushed up?

    I fully agree with TJ that those are great stories, but unfortunately there is not a single piece of evidence supporting those stories (except for the many ‘i have heard’ and ‘it was reported that’-bits referred to in this thread, but nothing even remotely serious), but an overwhelming amount of evidence proving that those stories are false. Yet people still want to believe those stories, or at least watered down variants? Please.

    in reply to: Underground hangars, reprise #2691977
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by Distiller
    Has anybody informations about that alleged US underground airbase near Herat, Afghanistan. Is that a propaganda hoax or real? Shindand Airbase?

    Well, it won’t be Shindand as it is in the middle of a plain. It’s a typical Soviet airbase, built quite fast but with very little infrastructure beyond the basics to keep the aircraft flying. I doubt Herat itself has any underground facilities either since it is a mostly civil airport.

    Here is Shindand.

    in reply to: Whatever happened to Kamov's Ka-60 "Kasatka" #2691995
    Arthur
    Participant

    Edited out of embarrasment… sorry.

    in reply to: Searchwater AEW vs Hawkeye and Erieye AEW systems #2692004
    Arthur
    Participant

    The Searchwater has the same shortcomings as any helo-based carrierborne AEW system – apart from the simple fact that those are AEW birds and can hardly be called true AWACS since there are hardly any command and control facilities aboard the helos.

    Britain is not the only user of the Searchwater radar though. Spain has a few SH-3D-AEWs, which are US-built Sea Kings fitted with the same equipment as the RN’s SKing AEWs. China also procured a few sets, there are at least two Y-8Js with Searchwater radars in an undernose fairing. I’m not sure if these are for AEW work or for maritime surveillance/patrol like in the Nimrod MR.2s.

    in reply to: Underground hangars, reprise #2692016
    Arthur
    Participant

    Good article Icarus.

    The picture i posted of Hualien is terribly old, i found. There indeed is a whole new runway built to the west of the ‘old’ Hualien, which is Jiashan (i’ve also seen ChaShan for it, could be a transcription thing though).

    You can see on the ONC chart where Jiashan was under construction to give an approximate location of it versus Hualien.
    Below are two maps of the airbases, the left one Jiashan and the other one Hualien. They are in the same scale, you can see the connecting taxiway going SE from Jiashan’s SE corner, and going NW from Hualien’s SW corner. They should be some five or six kilometres apart, the taxiway itself is built on a dyke and crosses a few water bits as you can see on the ONC map.

    http://www.twmone.com/images/_dossier/army/air_base_hualien_01.jpg

    in reply to: Swastika & Germany #1817552
    Arthur
    Participant

    Latvia used a red swastika too, from their involvement in the Russian civil war (just after independence) in 1918 to 1939 when the country was annexed by the Soviet Union. It was also diagonally like the German one but rotating the other way.

    in reply to: Underground hangars, reprise #2692141
    Arthur
    Participant

    Unfortunately, i could not find any pictures of Albania’s underground hangars. While they should have a few carved out shelters at more than one airbase, their main underground facility is at Gjadri/Lezhe where the F-7s are stationed.

    in reply to: Photo request and question #2692148
    Arthur
    Participant

    Those aren’t Su-7BKLs, they are plain old Su-7Bs (not even BMKs). The BKL has small skids next to the main landing gear, whereas the BM/BMK should have bulged doors for the nosewheel, which i don’t see here.

    And the Su-7 is a brilliant aircraft. Except that it has a very, very short range.

Viewing 15 posts - 4,531 through 4,545 (of 6,424 total)