dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 5,716 through 5,730 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Bagdad Museum Looted? #1988407
    Arthur
    Participant

    Re: haha Arthur….

    Vortex,

    Bit touchy again aye 😉 ?

    Vortex, the Dutch surrendered to the Germans after five pitiful days of resistance on May 15th, 1940. The first proclamation of the German kommandatur (local proclamations had already been made in other areas which were occupied even sooner) was in order to maintain order, stability and civil services.

    The prosecution of the Jews didn’t start for another year, which makes it perfectly besides the point. Unless you know something about US plans in Iraq we don’t }> ? (I really really want that devil back!).

    Sauron,

    The Soviet behaviour of stealing German artefacts is not acceptable, but it was not an issue back then because UNESCO was not yet in function. But i understand you don’t see a problem in the US moving to the same standards as the stalinist Soviet Union lived to? I’m impressed…

    Let me remind you again: a country’s standards are as high as a country claims them to be. If the US governments states it represents freedom, democracy and free trade, it better make sure it doesn’t lie too much. When North Korea is presenting itself as the pinnacle of freedom and decency, i’m sure i won’t be leaving them alone either.

    As a sidenote, perhaps you can tell me the difference between the Soviet theft of German art (and art stolen by the Germans during the war as well) and Operation Paperclip, in which the US gave German research a new owner?

    in reply to: XX885 Ground run #2118659
    Arthur
    Participant

    Yes, just found it, ex 98+14, former 918 with the NVA.

    Didn’t know they want to fly this one. Absolutely brilliant though, an AL21 powered Fitter (so not those third-world export versions) taking off at dusk is certainly one of the most impressive sights i have ever seen.

    in reply to: XX885 Ground run #2118667
    Arthur
    Participant

    Sukhoi????

    Not those pesky little aerobatic thingies, i hope?

    in reply to: sea vixen #2118671
    Arthur
    Participant

    Hmmm… can’t say i like it much. I think a scheme with many vertical colour shifts (silver nose, red fuselage booms, blue tail, something like that) takes away the attention from the pod/boom layout of the aircraft. Especially with the extended booms.

    IMHO, the ‘horizontal’ colour scheme like the Royal Navy’s or the LLanbedr colours this aircraft had previously, pays a better tribute to the aircraft’s unique shape.

    Nevertheless, i am happy that Red Bull is willing to spend the money to keep it flying. Something which is definately more valuable than my insignificant rant.

    in reply to: General Discussion #420103
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by Jonesy
    Arthur is the other one who really looks like his persona (which is intended as a compliment I assure you Art!)

    Uh-oh…

    in reply to: Pic of yourself? #1988434
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by Jonesy
    Arthur is the other one who really looks like his persona (which is intended as a compliment I assure you Art!)

    Uh-oh…

    in reply to: General Discussion #420117
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by Sauron
    Arthur

    Is that the same Geneva convention that applies to the middle east treasure plundered by guys like Schliemann and others and then stolen by the Russians during WWII which has never been returned?

    As for the duty of an occupant to immediately restore order: yep, that Geneva Convention. The US still knew how to do it in World War 2 (so did the Germans by the way), but i guess that ancient wisdom has been put in the Smithsonian rather than applying it in Iraq. However, this does not apply to the Soviet Union as it did not officially acknowledge the Geneva Convention until after WW2. It’s interesting to see you make this comparison though 😀

    However, the protection of cultural treasures and heritage is assured by UNESCO, which is a UN organisation – one of the more effective ones actually. Pre-UN misbehaviour in this respect is not an issue.

    in reply to: Bagdad Museum Looted? #1988460
    Arthur
    Participant

    Originally posted by Sauron
    Arthur

    Is that the same Geneva convention that applies to the middle east treasure plundered by guys like Schliemann and others and then stolen by the Russians during WWII which has never been returned?

    As for the duty of an occupant to immediately restore order: yep, that Geneva Convention. The US still knew how to do it in World War 2 (so did the Germans by the way), but i guess that ancient wisdom has been put in the Smithsonian rather than applying it in Iraq. However, this does not apply to the Soviet Union as it did not officially acknowledge the Geneva Convention until after WW2. It’s interesting to see you make this comparison though 😀

    However, the protection of cultural treasures and heritage is assured by UNESCO, which is a UN organisation – one of the more effective ones actually. Pre-UN misbehaviour in this respect is not an issue.

    in reply to: General Discussion #420261
    Arthur
    Participant

    The US broke the Geneva Convention by not securing the hospitals and historical treasures (most certainly those protected by UNESCO, like those in the Baghdad museum), and taking care of law, order and continuing civil services like trash disposal.

    Haven’t heard much about that in the American media either, so Sauron certainly has a point.

    in reply to: Bagdad Museum Looted? #1988504
    Arthur
    Participant

    The US broke the Geneva Convention by not securing the hospitals and historical treasures (most certainly those protected by UNESCO, like those in the Baghdad museum), and taking care of law, order and continuing civil services like trash disposal.

    Haven’t heard much about that in the American media either, so Sauron certainly has a point.

    in reply to: General Discussion #420282
    Arthur
    Participant

    Sauron,

    Does the phrase ‘Anti-trust case, United States vs. Microsoft’ ring a bell? This was actually one of the cases in which the US tried to support free trade for once.

    in reply to: This is funny and very clever #1988520
    Arthur
    Participant

    Sauron,

    Does the phrase ‘Anti-trust case, United States vs. Microsoft’ ring a bell? This was actually one of the cases in which the US tried to support free trade for once.

    in reply to: General Discussion #420287
    Arthur
    Participant

    Re: Bagdad Museum Looted?

    Originally posted by Sauron
    I wonder how many other stories we saw reported were exagerated or poorly reported?

    Somehow i don’t think you are referring here to all the “WMD-discoveries” which were proudly announced so far, but none of which were actually true 😉

    in reply to: Bagdad Museum Looted? #1988525
    Arthur
    Participant

    Re: Bagdad Museum Looted?

    Originally posted by Sauron
    I wonder how many other stories we saw reported were exagerated or poorly reported?

    Somehow i don’t think you are referring here to all the “WMD-discoveries” which were proudly announced so far, but none of which were actually true 😉

    in reply to: General Discussion #420358
    Arthur
    Participant

    I don’t care about how good or bad the guy has done, or that he didn’t need other people’s money to get started (in stead, he took other people’s ideas }> ).

    I only care about the product he delivers. With XP, i am finally reasonably satisfied. Before that, Bill made a lot of money on unreliable junk.

Viewing 15 posts - 5,716 through 5,730 (of 6,424 total)