…
i gave up when i wrote a letter to a local newspaper once complaining about the councils harsh actions about evicting some food stalls from a local tourist attractionit was so heavily edited and altered you could nearly believe it was a complaint from the opposite viewpoint
…
To be honest, an editor going over your posts would be a really great idea. You know, for stuff like grammar, interpunction, spelling.
I have a reference book from 1979 stating that Angola used three Fiat G-91Ys, ex-Portuguese. Can anyone substantiate this?
An often repeated myth, but it’s not true.
Firstly because Portugal never had the G.91Y, only the G.91R/3 and T/3. Secondly, all Portugese Ginas are accounted for, none of them having dissappeared somewhere in Africa. Besides, the Portugese G.91s served only for a few weeks in Angola (late 1974 -> jan 1975) and never were officially stationed there.
They were permanently based in Guinea (Esq121, 1966-1974) and Mozambique (Esq502 and later also 702, 1968-1974) though. But these were also nearly withdrawn after these countries gained independence.
In 1954, one of his Navy HTK trainers was modified to became the world’s first turbine helicopter. It also became the first remote controlled helicopter.
The first turbine helicopter was actually a modified Ka-225 (also by Kaman, not Kamov) in 1951. The modified HTK was the first twin turbine helo.
Tu-22 Blinder too, and one AH-56 Cheyenne prototype (with a low-flying helicopter that would probably meant that an ejection would give you an instant burial).
Tu-22 Blinder too, and one AH-56 Cheyenne prototype (with a low-flying helicopter that would probably meant that an ejection would give you an instant burial).
I don’t know what the Turkish Air Force has to do with the eternal subcontinental urinating competitions, but I’m pretty sure they don’t want to be involved in those squabbles. Thread cleared up, infractions handed out to PLA-MKII, Kramer (both with consequences), Rookh and BlackArcher.
Yeah, right. Let’s put all flamebait-topics into one quiz. I guess not.
Thread closed for being rubbish.
Can’t find the original pic, but i’m pretty sure that Kiwi F-16B is a (poorly) doctored image of a Dutch F-16B at an airshow.
Would have been nice, though 🙂
Care to tell why they are interesting?
Is it possible Airforce-technology.com got this information wrong??
The information is wrong. You can check for yourself: http://www.scramble.nl/cabase.htm
You have to remember the russian doctrine was to launch and guide aircraft from the ground onto the target as opposed to the west of having the pilot do the job, so equipment wise as well as pilot wise it was a different world…
Which happened to be exactly the same in the West. The STRIL-systems in Sweden, the US’ SAGE system… and don’t forget that GCI is a British-developed doctrine. Or do you honestly believe Lightning pilots where ment to loiter around and look for targets on their own?
I appreciate you read a lot of the pre-1990 publications on the subject, but for some reason some of that info is a bit outdated by now.
the MIG 29 engine BTW only has a 300 Hr life on it!!
Prototype engines, yes. Current production standard RD33s have a 4000hr service life. But then again, since it has always been a modular engine it hardly needs depot overhaul but can be repaired on the line.
All NVA aircraft got Luftwaffe serials.
Including the ones which went straight into storage: MiG-21, MiG-23, Su-22 (although a few of these were retained for trials at WTD61 at Manching for a few years), L29 (not sure if any remained in NVA service by 1990 though), L39, An-2, Z43, Mi-14.
Main reason for their retirement was lack of NATO interoperability, and the fact that they simply weren’t needed. Spares were not an issue in 1990; there were still plenty of spares around, and Dresden was a main hub for MiG-21 overhaul anyway. The spares issue only really happened after the Soviet Union broke up on dec31, 1991. That’s well over a year later.
The MiG-29 remained operational and did have an air defense mission (DACT was a secondary task) with JG73 at Laage. They were modified to MiG-29G standard to make them comply with NATO standards, and they were sold to Poland in 2004 where they are in service now.
The transport aircraft were retained both because they were useful (only long-range transports the Luftwaffe had were four old 707s), and because they became instant commuting aircraft for civil servants by the time the capital moved from Bonn to Berlin. The IL-62s, L410s and Tu-154s were used for this. Some of the Mi-8s might have been as well.
The MiG-17 was retired well before the reunification.
Except first day of war missions against peer nation air defenses, without assuming huge amounts of risk, and high attrition rates.
A peer nation would go nuclear, a non-peer nation wouldn’t need the effort.
Wow, that’s not even remotely topical. Thanks for this wonderful piece of copypasted unformation :rolleyes: