dark light

Arthur

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 6,424 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Hot Dog PLAAF; News and Photos volume 14 #2378041
    Arthur
    Participant

    Kiwinopal, or should we be calling you MiG-23MLD or Flogger, either you debate properly or you will be banned.

    You’re lucky we’ve let you slip this far.

    in reply to: Sukhoi Su-7 "7907" #1122728
    Arthur
    Participant

    Yeah, let’s be serious with the guy who wants to be covered in chocolate and thrown to the lesbians :p

    Are there any markings or construction plates left on the cockpit?

    in reply to: Small Air Forces Thread #13 #2386690
    Arthur
    Participant

    Could be Somalian, Stimpy posted a pic on page 16 showing a Hunter with a star very much like that one.

    Long been established that’s a Soviet red star which has worn off.

    in reply to: F-15A 73-0098 USAF SERVICE HISTORY #2389203
    Arthur
    Participant

    Served with 122FS/Lousiana ANG ‘JZ’ prior to it’s transfer to the IDF/AF in 1991. Flew there since at least 1986.

    I think it was originally delivered to 58TFTW/Luke AFB. I can’t find anything about any units inbetween though.

    in reply to: Canards and manoeuvrability #2389553
    Arthur
    Participant

    …what use what-so-ever is there of continous high AoA ?

    Fanboy debating topic 🙂

    in reply to: Defunct Types Resurrected into Production #1143899
    Arthur
    Participant

    The A-5 Vigilante.
    Original production run 1958-1964, then a follow-on order for 36 RA-5C’s built from 1968-1970.

    in reply to: New F-35 News thread #2390652
    Arthur
    Participant

    The Dutch vote will not be acted upon till AFTER the elections.

    Mind you that the great F-35 protagonist in the Dutch government (state-secretary Jack de Vries, Christian Democrat Party so that’s the conservative bunch) has just resigned for having an affair with one of his subordinates. Which wouldn’t be that much of a problem if he hadn’t been pushing morals and values in the Dutch military.

    in reply to: New F-35 News thread #2395265
    Arthur
    Participant

    What are you talking about? please provide a link describing how the F-35 is underpowered or over weight or I will consider this trolling.
    Swat fixed the F-35 weight issues.

    You will not consider anything trolling. Only moderators do.

    in reply to: France versus Israel regional Battle Royal! #2398543
    Arthur
    Participant

    Fair enough. Please continue.

    in reply to: France versus Israel regional Battle Royal! #2398550
    Arthur
    Participant

    Jessmo, you either come up with the source of your copypaste-work, or this thread will be closed and your posting rights will be suspended. The latter not only for not providing your source material, but also for a thread which can easily be seen as borderline trolling

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2398598
    Arthur
    Participant

    Thread closed, 22 pages is plenty.

    And jessmo24 – you WILL provide a source with your next bit of copypasting.

    Thank you

    in reply to: General Discussion #298537
    Arthur
    Participant

    So basically you want Britain to be more like North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, China, Venezuela and/or Cuba? Why not simply move there?

    Oh, and it’s factually incorrect. You can easily sail into and out of Venezuela 🙂

    in reply to: Let me see if i've got this right #1889846
    Arthur
    Participant

    So basically you want Britain to be more like North Korea, Iran, Afghanistan, Saudi Arabia, China, Venezuela and/or Cuba? Why not simply move there?

    Oh, and it’s factually incorrect. You can easily sail into and out of Venezuela 🙂

    in reply to: Why 3 different F-35 ? #2399624
    Arthur
    Participant

    Royal Air Force

    The first British prototype … (snip)… Operation Desert Fox in 1998.

    Low level is bad.

    From the proper interpunction and lack of spelling and grammar errors, it’s obvious you copypasted that piece of text from elsewhere.

    Providing the source would be nice. Common courtesy, even.

    in reply to: Reality of F-35 production cost #2403934
    Arthur
    Participant

    I realise that you and alot of others here object to the facts that pcfem posts here…

    You can’t object to facts. You can disagree with theories, you can deconstruct fabrications and you can criticise opinions. Which is exactly what happens in the discussions here.

    Some of us do infact appreciate his efforts to debunk the trash talk and dishonest garbage that frequently gets posted here surrounding the F-35.

    And because you lack factual input in the debate you have decided to sign up on these boards to become a pfcem cheerleader?

Viewing 15 posts - 121 through 135 (of 6,424 total)