dark light

richw_82

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 1,736 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Any Chance Of A Shackleton Returning To The Sky? #1132671
    richw_82
    Participant

    She did sound rather awesome, though when No 3 started to cough it did make me jump.

    The squeaking noise isn’t the engine, as it continued for some 30 seconds after being shut down. It’s definitely inside the aircraft.

    Regards

    Ric

    in reply to: Any Chance Of A Shackleton Returning To The Sky? #1132555
    richw_82
    Participant

    nice to meet you today rich, did you take any pics? i think its about time i got a project thread on the go for 963 🙂

    Ben, it was good to finally meet you too.

    Yes, I did get a few pictures with my little camera, I’m trying to get them on photobucket now. Start a thread, and I’ll put them in there when I’ve uploaded them. Lets see if we can’t raise 963’s public profile a little?

    I’ll have a better camera with me next time.

    Regards,

    Ric

    in reply to: Any Chance Of A Shackleton Returning To The Sky? #1132442
    richw_82
    Participant

    it will be a big struggle, but i wont quit until i see her in the air again!!! 🙂

    That makes two of us!

    in reply to: WW2 Aircraft Wrecks in the English channel(2008) #1123718
    richw_82
    Participant

    That’s an Aichi Seaplane, identified some time ago.

    John

    More info please?

    The fact it has curved leading edges, and aircraft such as the Seiran don’t, would lead me to say otherwise. The wing shape looks much more like a clipped wing Spit, given that the holes in the top surfaces are where you’d likely find cannon bays.

    Original pic

    http://forum.keypublishing.co.uk/attachment.php?attachmentid=166513&d=1224832543

    Compare this:

    http://www.internetmodeler.com/2005/october/first-looks/italeri_spitfire_24.jpg

    Rather than this:

    http://richard.ferriere.free.fr/3vues/aichi_seiran_3v.jpg

    Regards,

    Ric

    in reply to: WW2 Aircraft Wrecks in the English channel(2008) #1123527
    richw_82
    Participant

    Thanks John!

    Viewing objects through water is always misleading. I guess half the time the movement of water distort things and the other half your mind makes up.

    Regards,

    Ric

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1095857
    richw_82
    Participant

    This is excellent news, someone is very generous indeed and I join in thanking them wholeheartedly 🙂

    I think you will find it is. This is the relevent sentence which you may have missed:

    They have several weeks of servicing together with further modification work held over from the restoration), all of which HAS to be done before she can fly again.

    No, I quoted that sentence. I know the servicing has to be done before… it can hardly be done during flight now can it? But nowhere has operating costs, or the crew costs, or any of the stuff that appeared in those lovely pi charts that were kicking around a while back been mentioned. Just the idea of playing businesses.

    I was under the impression this project was supposed to be on a business footing from the start?

    Don’t put your wallets away yet, gents…

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1095887
    richw_82
    Participant

    As the result, I have pleasure in confirming that the Board of Trustees has decided that VTST now has sufficient funding in place to go forward with the planned engineering programme, and onward to the 2010 Display Season.

    Our main drive this year will be to finally put XH558 onto a firm business footing, with many new income generation schemes: Educational Lectures, New Merchandise, Regional Sponsorship, Competitions, and of course, an ongoing Annual Appeal. We must acknowledge we will continue to need public support, but gear the appeal over the whole year.

    While I’m glad that the money was found from somewhere… can somebody point out to me, where in the statement it metions actually putting her back in the air? All I see is mentions of starting the engineering programme. Already tales of “new” merchandise.

    I would have thought the main drive should be to get the beastie in the skies again, not put it on a business footing.

    I think the begging bowl will be out well before we see that happen.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1095613
    richw_82
    Participant

    I fart in the general direction of your criticisms. The fund raising will continue throught the year so that the over-optimistic begging bowl is less likely to poke its head out of the gutter at the end of the year. VTTS are getting better at managing the situation, if you think otherwise, if you think ‘how hard can it be?’
    You do it.

    I suppose my Dad smells of elderberries too now?! 😀

    Its too late to be getting better. It should have got better a long time ago, preferably before the Waddington appearance turned into the PR disaster it was.

    I suppose you know all these superb fund raising methods, to stir the public up to give the money that didn’t happen this time around. Maybe an appeal for her to take part in the upcoming Malvinas grudge match?

    I predict another begging session, Daily Mail campaign etc, before Waddington 2010.

    As to How hard can it be? Very hard. Me do it? Maybe, but not with a Vulcan.

    Plough,

    I’ve been on those forums. I’ve read the statements. A five year old with a crayola could easily write a business plan similar to theirs.

    Business plan by Johnny (age 5)

    1. Raise money
    2. Fly the big aeroplane

    Add a little pi chart at the bottom with no relation to reality, and you’re sorted.

    Substitute the word ‘clear’ for ‘vague’ in your post and you’re more or less on the mark. There’s no point in operating with no shows booked. Is it on the list for Waddington? No. Cosford? No. Farnborough? No.

    This is all assuming they have the money, of course. If the pi chart is to be believed then there’s a £1m shortfall for the coming year. That’s assuming that the money raised is going straight into the programme for things up front and not paying off any arrears.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1095638
    richw_82
    Participant

    I think you are trying to read things into the press announcement that are not there. Indeed, I think several previous posters are doing this and twisting what is written there so that they can have another dig.

    The reference to “and onward to the 2010 Display Season” pretty clearly refers to “getting the beastie back into the air” as you put it.

    It says nothing about getting it in the air. I’m reading nothing into the announcement that isn’t there. They mention the engineering programme…. that’s it. There’s a passing nod to the airshow season… which probably means it’s going to be another last minute dash to a few shows at the end of the season IF it flies.

    By their own admission they were broke at the end of this month. They now have enough in the kitty to do the engineering. Where’s the money (or another anonymous sponsor) going to be coming from to pay for operating it? They failed to get it from Joe Public.

    As for my thoughts on the “anonymous donor” it’s like the street beggar that hides his cash because he doesn’t want to make the pot look too full, and reduce people’s generosity. This 11th hour stuff month on month is getting old.

    The birthday card is turning into yet another joke. 5700 odd signatures so far. That’s a few short of the 558.000 intended, with only 87 days to go. Unless they start going down a phonebook for inspiration and signing the thing with by proxy, it’s not going to happen.

    Just like this daft idea that people at airshows are going to stump up £1 each because they’ve seen it at the show. If there’s a guy with a RAFA charity bucket, and some idiot wanting to add a surcharge to my day for looking in the general direction of his aircraft, the RAFA guy will get the money off me every time.

    Anybody seen any provisional bookings for airshows yet? No?

    As far as I’m concerned the only good thing to come out of this project was when 558 flew over my friend Lynn’s funeral to pay her tribute.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1094780
    richw_82
    Participant

    “Technically” she didn’t need to be at Waddington at all last year then. If it’s not there for flying, there’s no point as XM607 has got the ground side of things covered.

    As for 2008, the weather was good on the Sunday, but 558 had broken.

    in reply to: What Are You All Reading Now! #1094612
    richw_82
    Participant

    Everything But The Flak, by Martin Caidin.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1094614
    richw_82
    Participant

    It was better than 2007, and better than Saturday morning, when pretty much everything was on the ground. I didn’t say ‘fine’, I said ‘good’.

    One inaccessible Vulcan is much the same as another. So the arguments pointless. Up until a couple of years ago 607 was always positioned between the hangars on the airshow days.

    If you want to see XM607 closer, go for a wander down the A15 like everbody else does. she was still there when I went to Bracebridge Heath last week. She’s not on a plinth either, she’s on her own little Vulcan shaped pad. To say your location states you are in Lincoln, I would have thought you would have known that.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1094671
    richw_82
    Participant

    Yes… and it was a mighty shame to see it get dragged through a crowd of disppointed faces, into the large aircraft park, with the guys in black overalls ignoring people asking “Why?”.

    in reply to: The XH558 Discussion Thread (merged) #1093178
    richw_82
    Participant

    Plough,

    Okay, I’ll rephrase…. the weather was good enough. You were the one that decided it was the weather that stopped her, now you seem to have remembered what everybody else knew, that it was broken. Again.

    2008 was okay, in the grand scheme of things. Saturday afternoon made the show. If you couldn’t do both days, that’s not my fault. If you wanted rain, 2007 was rain…

    This is a plinth
    http://www.bc-heritage.org/bch/images/spotlight/fm212-560px.jpg

    When is a plinth not a plinth? When it’s a levelling pad. You don’t want to find her on the A15 one morning.

    It’s got axle stands. So what? Are you seriously suggesting that they park an aircraft for a long time in one place, without any form of securing? You can’t do that as long term it will kill the tyres, or she will do something totally unexpected like ending up sat on her bum…

    607 isn’t inaccessible. There’s plenty of people been close up to it, obviously just not you. It’s why she has a nice little brass plaque at the side of her for those that get close up.

    You seriously think that at any point during any day you can get closer to 558? Here’s news for you… currently both aircarft are kept on active airfields so the accessibility is just the same. Why do you think the tours around 558’s hangar are specially arranged? 558 was accessible at Waddo for about 25 minutes while they dragged her through an annoyed, disppointed crowd.

    As for having a wander… funny how the Police never bother moving on all those in the viewing area then on Airshow day? Not to mention the vast amounts of people walking into the airshow from nearby.

    558’s poor serviceability comes from the fact that everybody seems to take five or six flypasts on one flight as an event to artificially raise it’s service level. It’s not poor, but it’s not exactly as outstanding as made out.

    in reply to: Call for european youngsters interested in restoration #1093014
    richw_82
    Participant

    This is a call to all young adult Europeans (m+f) between 18 and 30 y.o., interested in classic aircraft restoration.

    Through a special EU program, Aero Fénix Museum is looking for volunteers wanting to spend one year in Portugal, restoring classic aircraft and learning the Portuguese culture and language.

    As these are EU organised courses, what qualifications would a successful applicant be likely to gain from them?

    Regards,

    Ric

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 1,736 total)